greenlight

  • Follow:
Latest Update: Today 5:00 PM
Michael Kanellos: July 24, 2009, 1:16 PM

UC Berkeley: Why Switchgrass Matters, and Algae by the Numbers

It's field trip day, and I'm at the Synthetic Biology Workshop at the University of California Berkeley co-sponsored by Innovation Center Denmark.

And naturally, one of the main topics is cellulosic ethanol, particularly from wild grasses like switchgrass and miscanthus.

"They can grow without fertilizer with little water on somewhat marginal land," said Henrik Scheller, director of cell wall biosynthesis at the Joint BioEnergy Institute at Berkeley.

The price is right too. Switchgrass and miscanthus can be grown for $50 to $80 a ton. That translates to feedstocks for ethanol of around 49 to 78 cents a gallon and feedstocks for octane (gas) producers at 72 cents to $1.15. By contrast, corn starch as an ethanol feedstock at the moment costs around $1.90. Using corn for octane would come to $2.80 a gallon. Palm oil is now around $2.55 a gallon and sucrose, the sugar harvested from Brazilian sugarcane, comes to around $2.15 a pound. Although sugar and corn prices are still above their traditional norms, these traditional feedstocks would still cost more than the grasses.

Unfortunately, lignocellulose is the most difficult to convert into sugars that can then be turned into alcohols or other substances. "The difficulty is in the processing," he said.

Research in the next few years will focus on ways to make it easier to remove lignin, the tough protein that surrounds plants. Research will also continue on enzymes to remove deconstruct plant materials, but progress could be more incremental. Enzymes are already highly evolved. Industrial enzymes come largely from a species of enzyme called Trichoderma, which in its natural state can chew up tents in the Philippines.

Another big focus for research: phase separation. Now, alcohol is distilled to separate it from water, a time consuming process. If microbes could be developed that produce fuels that will naturally separate from water somewhat quickly, the energy required to make fuel could be greatly reduced.

Algae? He likes it. But it may not be a miracle cure. Algae is capable of capturing 10 watts of energy per square meter, which translates to 4,385 gallons of fuel per acre per year. Although some companies promise 50,000 gallons of algae an acre, unless they shine lights on it, it won't happen.

"We can't promise more out of algae than incident sunlight can provide," he said.

Fun fact: It takes eight photons of light for algae to capture a single molecule of carbon dioxide.

Biofuels invariably will require genetic engineering, but it is debatable whether protests will erupt in the U.S.

"I've always viewed GMOs as a European problem," he said. A while back, he had a Swiss delegation in his lab. When they asked if some of the plants were genetically modified, and learned that they were, the guests asked why there weren't any guards around the lab.

Comments

  • FDDoty 07/25/09 11:14 PM

    You’re really distorting reality here.  Hay (except the low grade stuff, for which there is little market) and wood pellets are currently each about $200/ton in most areas – and that’s with oil at $65/bbl.  When oil is $200/bbl six years from now, these cellulosic feed stocks will be over $400/ton.  There’s no reason to think delivered switchgrass will be cheaper.  With feedstocks at $400/ton, cellulosic ethanol (at plant efficiencies expected within a few years) will be $5.50/gal.

    The picture for fuels from photosynthetic algae is much bleaker.  This is an area that has been heavily supported for more than 25 years.  If you know of any company that has produced even 500 gallons of fuel per acre per year for more than one year, I’d like to hear of them.  If you know of anyone who has produced fuels from photosynthetic algae for under $25/gal, I’d also like to hear of them.  I just came from the ASME Sustainability conference, where again there was plenty of hype, but no evidence of fuels from photosynthetic algae likely to be available for under $25/gal in the foreseeable future.

    I’ve been looking at this seriously as a scientist for a long time.  We’ve seen far too much renewables hype for the past six years.  More of it is not helpful.  There’s more sound info on these subjects under the Alternatives menu on the windfuels website.

    Reply
  • Craig 07/30/09 11:07 AM

    Ethanol plants are paying $50-80 per ton for dry feedstock like switchgrass and miscanthus. Farmers are able to double or triple their profits vs corn. Wood pellets are condensed versions of dry feedstock, so you’re comparing different material prices. And if you could forward me people paying $200 a ton for cut hay, I’m going to quit my job and become a hay farmer. That’s a ludicrously high figure for hay.

    Reply
  • Craig 07/30/09 11:13 AM

    Most importantly, yields of hay vs switchgrass and especially miscanthus are very different. Miscanthus produces 15-20 tons per acre, MUCH more than various hay crops. Do the math and you’ll see that it’s a different economic model than hay.

    Reply
  • Panicum 08/2/09 9:32 PM

    Trichoderma isn’t an enzyme - it’s a fungal genus.  And let’s get real - no one knows how much it “costs” to produce switchgrass or miscanthus yet because these crops haven’t been grown on a large enough scale long enough to determine production costs.  I should know - I conduct research on switchgrass and miscanthus.  There is a place for various biofuel crops - marginal land, CRP, etc., but they’re not going to eliminate our dependence on foreign oil.  People need to realize that we have no “silver bullet”, that no one alternative energy source will be able to replace oil, at least not yet.  We’re going to need to use all the alternative sources we can where they make sense if we want to make a dent in our foreign oil consumption.

    Reply
      • gotmercury? 08/7/09 4:05 PM

        We are not going to make much progress addressing climate change by focusing on replacing fuels or sources of electricity by switching away from fossil fuels to renewables.  All the solutions appear clever and are fun to debate but, seriously, we’ll be just powering up increased production and overabundance of air conditioners.  The answer to our climate woes may lie instead in informed and resrained consumption. 

        Its going to take a lot of database development, giving up some confidential business information, life cylce assessment modeling, oh yeah, and a whole new macro-economic model and an end to globalization.  Anyone care to know that using activated carbon to filter your drinking water may actually result in greater carbon emissions than boiling it?  How about all those carbon emissions embedded in the products from China?  And then there is beef. In one hand there is the planet, in the other hand there is the burger.

Need an avatar? Get one here: Gravatar

Green Light

Greentech Media's Green Light blog covers the full-scope of the greentech world, while expanding the range of our daily news reporting with brief and insightful blog posts from our Greentech Media editors, GTM Research analysts and numerous guest bloggers.

.