greenlight

  • Follow:
Wednesday, May 20, 2009 | Latest Update: 10:22AM
Eric Wesoff 05 20 09, 10:22 AM

Top 12 Greenest Cities in the U.S.

All politics are local. So is the progress in greentech.

Federal and state Renewable Portfolio Standards, federal loans and stimulus packages are vitally important programs.

But progress in greening our cities is going to come from local efforts as much as from on high. We take a quick look at some city-based green initiatives.

San Jose, Calif. considers itself the capital of Silicon Valley, and wants to be the global center of greentech innovation. The city and its Mayor, Chuck Reed, have initiated one of the nation's most aggressive green initiatives – the Green Vision program with a 15-year goal that includes:

1. Creating 25,000 cleantech jobs

2. Reducing per capita energy use by 50 percent

3. Receiving 100 percent of its electrical power from clean renewable sources

4. Building or retrofitting 50 million square feet of green buildings

5. Diverting 100 percent of waste from landfills

6. Recycling or reusing 100 percent of its wastewater (100 million gallons per day)

7. Ensuring that 100 percent of its public fleet vehicles run on alternative fuels

8. Planting 100,000 new trees

9. Replacing 100 percent of its streetlights with smart, zero emission lighting

San Jose calls itself the capital of Silicon Valley but Palo Alto, Calif. could arguably assume the mantle of its' heart (against the protestations of Mountain View and Menlo Park). Palo Alto is the home of Stanford University, Packard's garage (of Hewlett Packard fame), Facebook, and a lot of Venture Capital firms. Steve Jobs of Apple and Larry Page of Google call it home.

Palo Alto can also lay claim to be one of the nation's greenest cities.

In June 2008, Palo Alto adopted mandatory green-building requirements for residential and commercial development -- one of the most stringent green building ordinances in the nation.

New buildings and remodels in Palo Alto must meet standards developed by the U.S. Green Building Council or the Build It Green organization. Expect some public pushback since the green requirements can add from $2,000 to $10,000 to the cost of a home and 2 percent to 5 percent to the cost of a commercial project, according to a city report.

Palo Alto also has

  • A climate protection plan addressing CO2 emissions and water
  • A program for less-toxic pest control
  • Proposed stringent ordinances on construction and demolition debris, a major source of landfill material, waste, and toxics.
  • The "greenest" congressional office. Anna Eshoo, a high-powered Congressperson, recently unveiled the very first congressional office in the nation to go maximum green. Eshoo's office has installed a 1.6 kilowatts photovoltaic system and 100 percent of the electricity used by the office is obtained from renewable sources. The office has made profound green modifications to its' lighting, water, heating, cooling, materials, waste stream and the transit habits of its' employees.

Palo Alto has some competition from its neighbor/rival across the Bay – the Republic of Berkeley, Calif. 


Late last year, Berkeley's city council approved a plan to offer city-backed loans to building owners who install PV systems. The loans, up to $20,000 each, would be paid off as part of the owners' property-tax bills. This type of program could eliminate the biggest obstacle to solar deployments – the large upfront cost.

If this program succeeds, it could be expanded to finance other energy-efficiency efforts such as installing double-glazed windows or thermal insulation.

How about tiny Greensburg, Kan.? After being decimated by an F-5 tornado that leveled the city and left few homes standing, the survivors launched a plan to resurrect their town as the greenest city in America. All public buildings are to conform to LEED platinum standards.

Now, two years after the disaster, Greensburg's new homes are almost 50 percent more energy-efficient due to energy-saving windows, improved insulation, efficient heating, etc.

The people of Greensburg are pioneering the greening of a municipality, in one of the reddest states, no less.

Gainesville, Fla. is the first U.S. city with Feed-in-Tariffs.

In the first such program in the country, The Gainesville City Commission has approved a solar feed-in tariff for residential and business customers served by the Gainesville Regional Utilities in Florida. Wrote Ucilia Wang:

"Under the program, owners of solar energy systems would sell the electricity to the utilities at $0.32 per kilowatt-hour under a 20-year contract. The rate, which is higher than the price for conventional power, will remain for the first two years of the program. ... The program is modeled after the successful one in Germany, which has become the largest solar market in the world."

Other cities with claims on "the greenest" include:

Austin, Texas: Austin Energy, the city's municipally owned utility, plans to grow the renewables' portion of Austin's energy portfolio to 30 percent by 2020 and to build solar power's share to 100MW by 2020.

Boulder, Colo.: The city has resolved to become a zero-waste community.

Burlington, Vt.: More than one-third of energy used in the city comes from renewable resources, an impressive figure for the frosty Northeast.

Madison, Wis.: A bike-friendly city with an extensive recycling program that claims more than 90 percent participation.

New York City: High-density populations like NYC use fewer resources per capita. New Yorkers use of public transport dwarfs that of any other city.

Portland, Ore.: Portland is bike friendly, has set an urban growth limit to protect 25 million acres of open space, and recycles more than half of the city's trash.

San Francisco: More than half the city's residents use public or alternative transportation to get to work.

Please forgive the slightly California-centric selection in this list. Feel free to comment and let us know your choice for greenest city.

Comments

  • Dhez 05/21/09 11:13 AM

    Nice to see that so many are looking for ways to improve the world beginning locally.  Thanks for gathering the info.  Incidently, the twilight photo looks like San Francisco rather than Berkeley.

    Reply
  • Jeanavive Janssen - Team San Jose 05/21/09 6:17 PM

    I am happy to be working with a city that is considered one of the top 12 greenest cities in the u.s.! Several of my 28 hotel partners have their own green initiatives and I would be happy to put you in contact with their green teams for more information.  Also, check out Bay Area Green Meetings and Events http://groups.google.com/group/green-meetings-and-events  Jeanavive Janssen Team San Jose (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

    Reply
  • Eric Wesoff 05/22/09 1:46 AM

    Dhez:  I throw myself on your mercy.  I used the wrong photo and of course you’re right - that was SF.

    Reply
  • CelticSolar 05/26/09 12:13 AM

    Everyone wins in a ‘who can be the greenest’ competition’. That being said, Portland should be number 1 on the list. It had only a mere mention. Sustainlane has labeled Portland the #1 Sustainable City for multiple years running. Popular Science agreed and named Portland the 2008 greenest city in the US.  It has light rail and street cars to get around in and a solar powered trees illuminating one of the many stops. If walking, biking, or the train cannot get you there, the city has the highest per capita hybrid ownership of any place in the US. It has microbrew beer that is solar brewed and a gym where your spin class or miles on the treadmill are used to generate electricity. The largest solar manufacturing plant in North America is in the Portland suburb of Hillsboro… and there is much more.

    Reply
  • Warren 06/10/09 11:02 AM

    What is your methodology in determining this list? These are great points of reference, but in making such a “list” (it should be an actual ranking if it was based on real numbers and measures) you need to have a precise system as I did in my book, How Green is Your City? The SustainLane US City Rankings. 2,000 data points were used across 15 categories including renewable energy use, water, green buildings per capita, city innovation, planning and land use, public transit use/ walkability, local food, sustainability management and communications, etc. To illustrate what I am talking about, San Jose has very low public transit usage and walkability, and drving produces the most greenhouse gases in California. So even though they are innovative in some categories you must consider the impact of all city policies, programs and citizen/ business behaviors. In which case Portland tops the list, followed by San Francisco. This ranking has led to my work helping governments across the world set green city metrics and standards, inlcuding the European Union, Korea and the US Department of State, as well as the state of California and the University of Pennsylvania. Thanks for your contributions.

    Reply
  • Eric Wesoff 06/10/09 11:21 AM

    Warren,
    The title should have been “12 Green Cities” as it was not a systematic ranking like your fine work.  It was meant as a simple listing of a few city’s efforts in greening.  Please contact me at (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) and we can discuss your study and I can write a follow-up blog on your work.
    Eric

    Reply
  • Tony 06/10/09 11:54 AM

    In the New York City listing, you make a critical point, NYC looks sustainable in a number of categories on a “per capita” basis.  It is very laudable for each of these cities to vie for being the greenest.  However, we need to ask ourselves how these innovations translate to larger and larger populations - essentially large cities.  As others noted, we also need to look at the total collection of activities rather than picking a few easy and high profile activities.  Portland’s average population density cannot be the model other large cities should copy.  San Francisco’s method for water use, Hetch Hetchy Reservoir in Yosemite National Park, is still a major sustainability challenge, decades after it spawned the Sierra Club to try to stop it.  Every city is a mix of good and bad choices.  I suggest that we use green metrics as guides for progress with the ultimate goal of making urban living the best per-capita sustainable strategy.  Which combination of practices, when applied to the NEXT 3 billion people (most of whom will live in coastal cities) will give us the most sustainable outcome?  The city that moves fastest in that direction may be the one we should praise.  Tony.

    Reply

Green Light

Greentech Media's Green Light blog covers the full-scope of the greentech world, while expanding the range of our daily news reporting with brief and insightful blog posts from our Greentech Media editors, GTM Research analysts and numerous guest bloggers.

.