• Friday, November 20, 2009 Latest Update: 4:41PM
Eric Wesoff | October 28, 2009 at 8:07 AM 7 Comments

Bloggage From SPI, Part 2: A Hopeful CPV Panel

I moderated a panel on Tuesday on Concentrating Photovoltaics (CPV) at the Solar Power International show in Anaheim.

I am an unlikely choice for the CPV moderator role as I have not always heaped praise on the CPV industry (see here and here). 

But I kept an open mind, and our panel explored the progress that CPV has made and the challenges that lie ahead.

Our panelists:

  • Mark Crowley, President and CEO, SolFocus 

Jerry Bloom, a longtime energy and renewables attorney at Winston served as a reality check – reminding us that solar competes with 4 cent per kilowatt hour coal and cheap nuclear power. And that renewables face an uphill battle in making inroads in the dominant energy energy mix.

But the CEOs of these CPV firms, selected for this panel because they are on the cusp of full-scale commercialization, are driven and optimistic and they made these points:

  • CPV is just at the beginning of its cost curve.  Concentrix' Lerchenmüller sees CPV achieving costs of 30 cents per Watt in a few years.
  • CPV with high-efficiency triple-junction solar cells behaves better than silicon in high temperatures.
  • CPV doesn't require water like CSP and unlike CSP scales to smaller deployments.
  • Notably, the price of capex for CPV is much less than that of other PV technologies: $0.10 to $0.15 per Watt compared to First Solar at about $1 per Watt and a-Si at about $3 per Watt.
  • CPV, at least for these three firms, is becoming a "bankable" and credible technology.

NREL CPV expert Sarah Kurtz noted that the anticipated timeline for CPV has been far exceeded with Energy Innovations and the company's 1200 sun system claims a module efficiency of 29 percent. 

All of the CEOs expected the prices of the solar cells to drop. Lerchenmüller spoke of the parallel between those cells, which are essentially LEDs, having to follow the falling price trajectory of LEDs whether they come from Emcore, Spectra, Azure Space or one of the newcomers like Cyrium or Solar Junction.

And impressively, between the three CPV firms on the panel – there is the potential for almost 100 megawatts of factory capacity within the next year.

These firms still face the competitive challenge of plunging silicon costs and the difficult financing environment.   But, of the more than 45 VC-funded CPV firms, many of them doomed, these three hardy firms have a decent chance of surviving and succeeding.

Comments [7]

  • StevePluvia 10/28/09 12:27 PM

    You gotta give it up to Energy Innovations for sticking with their CPV project.  8yrs of development and still no commercial product… Them guys define tenacious…

    Reply
  • montgomejj 10/29/09 1:27 PM

    Eric, re: Steve’s comment: how much further before their “bankable” tech is in Konarkaesque “money oxidation” territory?

    Reply
  • Eric Wesoff 10/29/09 3:18 PM

    I like that “money oxidation” term.  Thank you very much.  CPV has more of a utility-scale shot than does flexible OSCs.  I hope we can agree on that.  Still, c-Si and FSLR’s price curve is a dangerous trajectory to have to compete against and I don’t envy the CPV CEO’s lot.  So, that leaves sun belt deserts with no water resource, limited space, and favorable subsidies.  A niche play.

    Reply
  • montgomejj 10/30/09 9:33 AM

    Glad you like it—it’s your phrase! Heard you say it a couple summers ago @ SemiconWest/Intersolar.

    Reply
  • SkyeGuy 11/3/09 1:15 PM

    I’ve never heard of Spectra and can’t seem to find a trace of them anywhere.  What’s the story with them?

    Reply
      • Eric Wesoff 11/4/09 5:19 PM

        Spectrolab, not Spectra.  Sorry.  Fixing now.

  • keefwivanef 11/16/09 5:21 PM

    “So, that leaves sun belt deserts with no water resource, limited space, and favorable subsidies.  A niche play.”

    Once again the GREAT MORE POWER PER ACRE myth.

    CPV demands tracking.
    Tracking arrays need wide spacing to avoid shadowing.
    They can NEVER deliver more power then an optimally aligned fixed array.

    Between them the “CPV DEVELOPERS ” industrry has devoured GAZZILLIONS of investors dollars and delivered precisely nothing.
    sigh
    WOOF

    Reply

Green Light

Greentech Media's Green Light blog covers the full-scope of the greentech world, while expanding the range of our daily news reporting with brief and insightful blog posts from our Greentech Media editors, GTM Research analysts and numerous guest bloggers.

.