The Two Futures for Solar

Can solar avoid the commodity trap? Yes, if it can learn from the PC industry.

The Two Futures for Solar

Is solar a commodity?

Actually, the reality is worse than that.

Photovoltaic panels are complex semiconductors that require advanced manufacturing processes and a continual stream of innovations in efficiency, packaging, encapsulants, electronics and mounting. In many ways, it's as unlike a commodity as you can get.

Yet, because of a wide array of manufacturers and a proliferation of solar know-how, solar panels are subject to commodity-type pricing. Put another way, solar manufacturers have to behave like chip makers and medical device manufacturers when developing their products and then fight over every penny like makers of copper tubing, corn syrup or gravel when it comes time to sell them. It's tough work for an often meager reward.

PC makers have had to survive in a similar environment, but even they have enjoyed advantages that elude solar manufacturers. PCs wear out after four to five years. With products that last 20 to 30 years, solar manufacturers have virtually no replacement market to chase. PCs are also visible: Apple makes money by selling status symbols to people who pretend to disdain them. It takes some creativity to ostentatiously display the brand of something bolted onto your roof.

The closest analogy to the solar industry, in my mind, is computer memory, which is terrible news. Computer memory really isn't a business -- it's more like a bad gambling habit. Manufacturers regularly lose millions and yet have to steadily double down by putting billions into new fabs and R&D so they don't lose even more money as the state of the technology zips by. In the late 90s, memory makers enjoyed a brief surge of accelerating profitability. Then it turned out that the good times were the result of price fixing schemes. One flash memory company -- Spansion -- did not report a profitable quarter between the period before its IPO in the early part of the decade and its 2009 Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

Micron Technology, one of the biggest memory makers in the world, is now exploring solar. These guys are experts at living through prolonged periods of losses. Be forewarned.

If solar follows this path, it could be bad for the entire alternative energy industry. Solar conferences would gradually transform from being exciting, well-attended events sought after by big cities to becoming generic gatherings -- Zig Ziglar to Headline Tile and Grout World and SolarCon 2014 -- in the back ballrooms at the Doubletree. The wave of talent in universities gravitating toward energy could swing back toward computer science and the Internet. Layoffs could become chronic. Solar wouldn't be the next hot thing -- it would be  one step above painting your body silver, standing on a bucket and pretending to be a statue for a living.

But there is a path to avoid this fate. And here are some of the things the industry can do for a better life:

1. Marketing. I can't emphasize this one enough. Most solar manufacturers act like they are selling hot water heaters. Or industrial carpet. "It's a utilitarian product, but you need it and it will save you money in fifteen years," seems to be the overriding marketing message.

What are the main differences between a BP panel and one from Sharp or Kyocera? Few people in the industry, let alone consumers, could give you a quick answer. Most solar execs probably couldn't even identify panels from these companies in a lineup.

It's not an impossible task. Dyson has made its vacuum cleaners status symbols through touting its innovations. Bosch made brand names important in dishwashers twenty years after that product line went somewhat generic. Can consumers be swayed by important-sounding features or an exotic heritage? If you come over to my house, I will show you the kitchen sink that came from Switzerland.

SunPower has created awareness among consumers through its advertising campaign; a different-looking panel has helped, too. Manufacturers need to highlight their products' capabilities -- consumers and installers won't do it for them.

2. Diversification. Not every roof is the same. Soliant makes a concentrating PV system for flat roofs in the U.S. Southwest and similar climates. It's a sub-segment of the market, but if Soliant can provide the best solution for these sorts of customers, it might survive. Similarly, Suntech Power Holdings has begun to optimize different panels for different markets: the ones sold to utilities are different than the ones sold to houses. Suntech even sells panels to modular home builders in Japan that integrate the panels into the original construction. Others are moving in this direction, but Suntech has also been more successful in touting it.

3. Aesthetics and Modularity. Akeena Solar's Andalay panel sells for more than the average panel, but continues to get customers. Why? Consumers are willing to pay for the convenience of having easier-to-install modular racks, says CEO Barry Cinnamon. Armageddon Energy touts hexagonal solar cells. They are easy to install and nearly everyone comments on the shape. For another example, check out Zep Solar's modular rack: it saves money, but one of the selling points will be the novelty.

4. Added functionality and integration. The IT market has mastered this art. PCs have graduated from functional devices to full-fledged entertainment centers by creating applications -- search, online video, etc. -- to exploit the growing bedrock of transistors. The sun gives off heat and light. PV panels only exploit light. A few companies make all-in-one devices that combine PV with solar thermal collectors for hot water heaters and most of them are quite small. However, if the technological kinks can be worked out, the big guys should try it. Solar lighting could also be added as a function.

Integrating new functions can't stop relentless price cutting, but it can certainly help slow it down.

The smart grid/building management industry might provide help here, as well. There is no reason smart thermostats can't include better data drawn from the power produced by solar panels. These thermostats can also include a brand badge, similar to the badges on notebooks, identifying the manufacturer. (See recommendation #1.)

5. Hugging consumers. Dell did not become a multinational corporation by building the best computers in the world. Instead, it made sure that customers felt they got better service online and on the phone than they could get at stores. Michael Dell himself would often don a headset and work the support desk in the early days to highlight the importance of attentiveness and responsiveness to customer needs.

The company's decline began when a new crop of executives from Bain & Co. and McKinsey came in that disdained the sort of relentless sucking up that today's modern consumer demands.

Solar installers Sungevity and Solar City seem both to have a handle on making the person ready to shell out several thousand dollars feel like a prince. When Best Buy makes its foray into solar and energy management, expect a huge push on hand-holding.

6. Relentless Hucksterism. Sungevity also recently came out with a leasing program that guarantees consumers that they will save money with solar or they will get their money back. Those are magic words in this country. As time goes on, expect more solar companies to move away from the sanctimonious aspect of solar -- you're helping the earth, you're reducing your power bills, etc. -- toward putting cartoon Aztec sun gods all over their websites.

7. Go big and make friends. Like the PC industry, consolidation will become inevitable in solar. The top ten will likely become the Big Four in a few years. Thus, these companies should start finding a partner now. Forging tighter links with home builders and retrofitters will help, too.

8. Impulse buying. Right now, the biggest problem in solar is paperwork and planning. Because of the way state and federal rebate programs work, many of these headaches are unavoidable. The SolarTech Consortium is working on a standardized contract, according to executive director Doug Payne. Once it's out, installers and panel makers will then have to figure out ways -- group buying at corporations, online specials, etc. -- to capitalize on it.

9. Accept Death. In high tech, companies with great ideas regularly die. Packard Bell helped create the home PC market before it died. Tablets have been tried several times in the past to little fanfare. But the executives live on. So give it a shot -- the worst than can happen is that you will get a new job.

30 Comments

  • Nrgwise 04/8/10 6:42 AM

    A very interesting article. To bad solar is such a waste of money.
    Other than making installer rich, the bottom line is it costs at best
    5000 to 7000 to produce about $100 worth of electricity
    this is a 50 to 70 year payback on a 25 year device.
    Worse yet when the inverter craps out in 15 years,
    it won’t. Make financial sense to replace it as the cost could
    be more than the electricity that will be left to gain.
    If we spent a very small fraction of what the govt
    spends on subsidizing this very expensive cost on efficiency
    we would be miles ahead, pit s lot more people
    to work and not be spending so much on so few
    so they can look so cool.
    I wish I was wrong.

    Reply
      • matt 04/8/10 12:42 PM

        Yes, you are wrong.  Have you studied manufacturing industries?  They all follow the well worn experience curve - each time capacity doubles, costs fall by a predictable amount.  Frequently this amount is 20% - and in fact solar PV has outpaced this over the last 20 years and is likely to continue to do so over the next twenty.  What does that mean?  Solar PV costs will continue to rapidly fall and the small gov’t investment will be re-payed over and over.  Good think you weren’t running Intel, Micron or Seagate in the 80’s - or I wouldn’t have this computer to type on.

  • IlGhiDo 04/8/10 9:24 AM

    Luckily you *are* wrong. say you install a KWp of PV for 3000$. That retail electricity is 15 cents and grows at 3%/year, that you produce 1500kWh/kWp per year, a discount rate of 8%, accounting for module degradation you get a cash flow worth 2980$. if your cost of capital were 5% you would get 4000$.

    Reply
      • PVF 04/8/10 12:08 PM

        And who exactly, is installing a kW for $3k?

      • Nami 04/15/10 6:47 PM

        dear PVF and NRGwise,

        While there is a high upfront cost to owning and installing home solar panels, there are financing options available that allow you go to solar for very little down.  I work at SunRun and our power plans (power purchase agreements or lease, depending on your area) allow homeowners to go solar for as low as $0.  You just pay for the solar electricity.  So PVF, you can, indeed, install a system for $3000, and even less!  And NRGwise, the inverter will need to be replaced, but SunRun will maintain and repair (as well as monitor) your system and replace your inverter for free.  Home solar can be affordable, a wise investment, and very easy - don’t lose heart!

      • PVF 04/19/10 6:15 PM

        Thanks Nami, believe me, I understand and appreciate what SunRun and others like them are doing for financing.  That said, you’re financing a $4/W or $5/W system, probably $6/W or $7/W, if your affiliates’ recent quotes I’ve seen are representative of actual install prices.  So, I’l repeat the question for IIGhiDo:  Who exactly is installing a kW for $3k?  I have yet to see it.

  • rooferguy 04/8/10 10:15 AM

    Michael Kanellos:  “Surely solar is a commodity.”

    Module Manufacturers:  “Don’t call me Shirley.”

    Reply
  • Solar Fred 04/8/10 11:27 AM

    Great article, Michael. I’ll repeat what I said on “Don’t Solar a Commodity, Sucker” piece, I think this strategy below comes under your “marketing” point, but also your “Huckster” and several others. I would analogize solar modules to the smart phone business. A cell phone is a cell phone, and yet… if you can add Apps. Don’t know what that would be for PV, but this is where creative engineering comes in. However, to underline what I said in the previous piece:

    To most consumers and installers, PV panels are basically interchangeable with few design modifications to meet the client’s needs. Hence, a commodity. That being said, I think panels are in different subclasses of commodity. That is, SunPower and Sharp and other high efficiency panels with long track records compete on the same cost playing field, whereas the new Chinese companies that have yet to prove themselves are in another somewhat lower level. One could also make another commodity market for low efficiency thin films, where space is no object, but price is.

    After you’ve broken up the brands into these tranches and their prices are are within a few percentage points, what will make them different? As a marketing consultant, I answer this all of the time, and my answer always comes down to different versions of one thing: Service: For example, Are your panels easy to install? Prove it and advertise about it. Can you provide low interest financing for installers? For the installer’s customers? Do you provide low-cost training? Can you provide installers customer leads? Can you provide quick shipping to the site so that installer warehouse space and upfront costs are reduced. Can you provide co-marketing opportunities? Is your ordering process/website user friendly? Is your website directed toward a particular country with excellent, easy to read English/German/Spanish, etc? Do you provide end of life recycling?  Then there’s effectively communicating about all of these time and money saving services and extras. Who is your messaging speaking to? Utilities? Installers? Consumers? Don’t try to be everything to everyone with one message. I could go on and on and on.

    The good news is that there are so many ways to provide the above added value services, and it is these services and how companies execute them that will grow brands as well as protect them from becoming the dreaded commodity.

    Tor Valenza aka “Solar Fred”

    Reply
      • Michael Kanellos 04/8/10 11:50 AM

        Yes. Thanks for the comment. Jeff Wolfe at GroSolar has said the solar industry has a cultural issue it needs to change and what you said goes to the heart of it. I worry about this because I covered memory and hard drives for years. It’s a harrowing path to follow.

  • Solar Fred 04/8/10 12:17 PM

    And yet, think of Intel, Michale: Bum, Bum, Bum! Bum! You’ve seen the commercials, you’ve heard the jingle/tones, and quite frankly, I do look for Intel chips in my laptops, not AMD. I’m not educated enough to know the difference in technology, but I do have a good “feeling” for Intel, so this is my preference. Jeff is a great leader in the industry. If you’ve seen Gro’s new ad campaign, you know he and his team are putting their money into this philosophy of *connecting* with consumers. Building relationships, which lead to good feelings and good referrals. But GroSolar is an installer and distributor. Service, as I said, cannot be commoditized. Installers like GroSolar and Sungevity embrace this. Module manufacturers must do the same for their B to B clients—as well for consumers. Bum, Bum, Bum! Bum! There’s a reason you’re hearing this music in your head. Creative, *connecting* marketing and services work. :)

    Reply
  • disdaniel 04/8/10 12:31 PM

    “The sun gives off heat and light. PV panels only exploit heat.”

    Huh? Did you mean that PV panels only exploit light?

    Reply
      • Michael Kanellos 04/8/10 1:11 PM

        Yes. Light and sometimes Phlogistin. Thanks!

  • FreeCleanSolar 04/8/10 4:12 PM

    yikes, solar represents what, maybe 1% of energy production?  Focusing on commodity status and its implications seems a bit premature.  And if you were to ask the typical American homeowner, they would not consider such a large purchase to be a commodity. 

    That said, I agree that good positioning, differentiation and creative marketing/service strategies can make a difference.  However, those offering “free money” leases today will not last and will be bit players as prices decline, PACE emerges and home equity eventually returns.

    Reply
      • OPCGirl 04/13/10 8:01 PM

        FreeCleanSolar raises a couple of interesting points.  Can something be a commodity without having a large market share?  Can it be a commodity and have a large price tag?
        If the price of the inverter is reduced so smaller, cheaper PV systems are created, then there might be more widespread residential adoption.  The PV system wouldn’t need to reduce 100% of the homeowners’ grid reliance, but enough to offset their peak usage.  Of course, it might be harder to sell to more numerous, smaller customers than fewer, larger customers, but as Solar Fred mentions, that is one way to identify a niche.
        I also think a variant of Rob Powell’s “Channel Your Energy” might be interesting.  Instead of having numerous customers invest in solar in suboptimal conditions (wherever their residence or business is located), have users invest in centralized projects developed by their electricity providers, with the dividends being paid in the form of reduced power bills.

  • neplusultra 04/8/10 4:28 PM

    To a certain extent it’s the nature of the product. It just unsexy. A big “thing” of some sort that sits on the roof.

    The PC industry is a commodity business that has incredible internal differentiation. Think HP v Apple. Think Nvidia v AMD. They differentiate on a massive rush in technological advance. This sells product. They differentiate on capability. This sells massive product. They differentiate on price, or the pronounced trending down in price. This sells product. They have sexy ad campaigns and sponsor sexy things like Formula One. This sells product.

    The solar industry has minimal internal diversification. Think Sharp v SunPower. Woo Hoo! Whatever… The solar industry suffers from a 20 yr replacement strategy. No buzz building there.  There is little differentiation in capability, efficiency or pricing. Nothing really there.

    So what to do? It’s economic and business models that will differentiate. That is starting to present itself.

    Reply
  • glenn2ns 04/8/10 4:53 PM

    barriers to entry- or NO barriers to entry If there is margin to shave, the imperialist pigs will dive in and drop their margin.  Best to be brutally honest about this.  CPV in the distributed market WOW! now that’s different -that earns market share and fatter margins.  More electrons for less real estate.  More electrons for less infrastructure.  Seems like we are past thin film and conventional flat panel is not far behind.  Best to be brutally honest and then aggressively capture market with innovation.

    Reply
      • mds 04/9/10 11:31 AM

        Well I’m not going to say you’re wrong about CPV.  I’m very interested in seeing how Morgan Solar fairs, just to give one CPV example.  ...BUT what about Dow Chemical’s integration of Global Solar CIGS cells into roofing shingles?  Won’t this compete pretty ruthlessly with CPV for lowest installation costs?  The install cost will be only slightly more than the cost for a new roof when you need one.  What happens when quantum dot technology is used to produce >30% efficient ThinFilms and these are integrated into roofing materials, windows, and/or external wall coverings or siding?  I think the potential for continuing to increase ThinFilm PV efficiency and reduce installation costs means ThinFilm PV is just getting started.  Maybe ThinFilm and CPV will both succeed but in different niches?  One thing is for sure, the cost per kWh of solar is going to improve (drop) dramatically in the future.

  • rooferguy 04/8/10 6:00 PM

    CPV requires delicate trackers and electronics.  Way more expensive than silicon cells, no more efficient on a net-area basis, and no technology curve to reduce costs.  CPV guys will all go the way of the flim flam thin film guys because they’re both trying to solve the “silicon is $400/kg” problem.

    Reply
      • mds 04/9/10 11:08 AM

        “guys will all go the way of the flim flam thin film guys”
        You mean like that poor suffering CdTe ThinFilm company First Solar?

  • Richard Poor 04/8/10 6:40 PM

    The knee benders and deep breathers never fully embraced solar water heating and now they wax and wane over PV!  Solar water heating is demonstrably cost effective, creates trades jobs, displaces KWH or therms of gas for less money outlay than any other active solar technology and yet it is almost ignored by so called, green advocates!  Amazing! Driving an EV via grid tie PV is less expensive than $2.60/gallon fossil fuel…so when do the “advocates” publicize this hard fact? Amazing!  and very disappointing.

    Reply
      • Solar Fred 04/9/10 12:43 PM

        It’s a good point, Richard, but off the topic of commoditization. Solar Thermal is the poor solar stepchild. I’m actually personally working on changing that for a new solar thermal manufacturer, Free Hot Water, but it will take time… and creativity. Public education about solar economics is still lacking for both PV and solar thermal. But again, this is off topic, so I’ll leave at that.

  • if 04/9/10 12:21 AM

    Solar produces and enables someone to sell electricity, which is a commodity and a cheap one at that.
    The current federal incentive structure (30% ITC and fast depreciation) and performance incentives in CA (15 or 32 cent / kWhr performance based incentive for the first five years of operation) allows developers installers and financiers to make a good amount of profit if systems are priced sufficiently low.

    It is true that there are people who want to be “off the grid” or “green” and will pay a premium - I’d say that market is the one that will pay extra for the bells and whistles and is nothing to sneeze at. This is where marketing is key. The remaining (huge) part of the market does not care as long as the electricity is cheaper than the alternative (e.g. natural gas and coal and wind) and they can save or make money. They will care if renewable energy credits and incentives go up, and incentives and install costs come down and allow them to actually save money. There is considerable value to knowing exactly what your electricity will cost for 20 - 30 years out. Alternatively, there’s a feed-in tariff. Marketing will work if there are savings to be had that people don’t know about.

    Companies like Soliant can offer a high kWhr/kW yield due to 2x tracking and are attractive if the cost savings due to energy yield based incentives are high enough to outweigh the potentially higher upfront costs. Leasing programs will work while the ITC and fast depreciation are in place -  someone who knows how to monetize those rebates will put up the debt/equity to finance a system.

    IlGhiDo, let me know where I can get that $3/W installed system without having to convince First Solar to lower their gross margin to 30% :).

    Reply
      • IlGhiDo 04/9/10 6:04 AM

        I have seen a ground mounted system offered at 2.2.€/Wp in Germany (>1MWp) and a commercial rooftop system offered at 2.4€/Wp (>100kWp). Both c-Si with bankable Chinese modules. EPC price, no land/roof, no developer’s fees, but the point I am trying to make is that pricing can be significantly lower than what quoted by nrgwise, even when you include margins. For that matter, you can also find zones -especially in the US- that yield >1.8kWh/Wpyear which can offset costs I have not included in the ~3$/Wp.

      • if 04/9/10 11:56 AM

        IlGhiDo
        I guess FSLR does quote around €/Wp for install (not sure what it is for others in Eurote) and I can see you getting modules from China for 1 €/Wp + marginal inverter costs. Surprised that rooftop only costs 0.2 €/Wp more than ground mount. That gets you down to 12cents/kWhr in the US if you factor in the ITC and 5 year depreciation.

  • JoeJoe 04/9/10 1:57 AM

    This article is very interesting. Thank you for bringing this important information to ours attention. There is a great invention you should finding about. It makes goodness. Famtastic yes!

    http://www.filmsite.org/mrshowbz.html

    Cheers

    Reply
  • markcarter 04/9/10 6:05 AM

    I am planning to buy a new home. Yesterday I went to see the property.A lot of properties in that area has some weird things installed on their roof tops.On further enquiry I could understand that these weird things were solar panels which can produce power for my new house.Somebody asked me to visit FreeCleanSolar.com to get more info. This site gave price comparisons, manufacturers of solar, leasing, financing, tax, credits and rebates. Do you guys think I should install these on my house??

    Reply
  • mds 04/9/10 12:02 PM

    OK I will concede solar PV is not entirely a commodity product.  Brand name recognition and customer satisfaction are important, HOWEVER electricity IS a commodity and the cost per kWh of electricity delivered by your solar PV panel IS THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTOR.  In other words, cost per kWh is the commodity aspect of solar PV (or CPV) that is the most critical.  You can make a higher cost per kWh product look pretty with good marketing and customer support, but it will still just be pig with lipstick and your company will fail.  Why is First Solar taking market share faster than SunPower?  It has a lower installed cost per kWh!  It may take a while for CIGS companies to prove their product can last (i.e. achieve “bankability”), but a few of these companies will likely succeed because of their potential for reducing cost per kWh.  CPV also has promise here.  ...and quantum dot ThinFilm PV that is still being developed.  (Installation cost and BOS costs are starting to enter into this pricing contest in a very big way.)
    Bottom line:  Make sure you have a nice looking young lady out there on the fashion-show floor before you start dressing her in finery.  Keep your priorities straight!  Solar technology is changing rapidly right now.  Capex and installed cost per kWh are critical factors.  Marketing is also important, but…

    Reply
  • gilberto.gabrielli 04/11/10 5:58 AM

    True! Anything that has to be done is to improve the brand recognition and a sort of client’s strategy approach that seems to be applied as a smart solution for specific needs.
    I visited several exibitions and until now the messages were more or less this: good products, reliability, cost awareness.
    No producer will survive only with this messages.
    We are trying to combine agriculture with PV industry and we are not at the forefront. Why not discover new comined markets?

    Reply
  • Rob Powell 04/12/10 2:39 PM

    I envision a new way for solar to be purchased that does not involve installation at a customer site, but behaves more like a financial instrument.  Why not sell solar power to people where it makes the most sense to install, instead of where they live? 

    This solar charity is doing that very thing in a non-profit context.

    http://channelyourenergy.org

    After all, until solar hits grid parity we will not see it fully penetrate.

    Reply
  • insider 04/14/10 6:44 PM

    I think anyone who doesn’t grasp that PV cannot make a dent against a GHG unless it becomes a commodity is unqualified to comment about the industry.

    Reply
Need an avatar? Get one here: Gravatar