Rooftop Solar, Batteries Included

Silent Power wants to be the battery-solar panel system in GE’s future net-zero energy homes, which will likely require utility rebates.

General Electric's "net-zero energy" home of the future – which is planned for 2015, but exists only on paper right now – relies on a rooftop solar array to give the home enough energy to spin back the electricity meter (see GE Unveils Net Zero Energy Home Strategy).

But that blueprint also includes a battery. Without it, solar may be too unstable an energy source to incorporate into utility grids in a big way.

Silent Power has a solar inverter-battery rig it says can accomplish that balancing task. In fact, the Baxter, Minn.-based startup is involved with GE in at least a few smart grid projects seeking stimulus funding to install those systems across a large number of homes, CEO Todd Headlee said last week at the Clean Energy Venture Summit in Austin, Texas.

Silent Power has raised $4 million in angel financing, and is seeking to raise a $7 million series A round to "attack the utility space," with commercialization planned for 2011, Headlee said.

As for GE, "We've partnered with them on a couple of proposals," he said, though he wouldn't give additional details on the projects the two were planning (see Green Light post). 

The problem with utility-scale energy storage has so far been its price. Beyond huge, capital-intensive and site-limited systems like pumped hydro and compressed air energy storage, batteries, flywheels, fuel cells and other distributed energy storage technologies are still too expensive for most utilities to justify (see Grid Energy Storage: Big Market, Tough to Tackle).

Silent Energy says it can drastically undercut those costs by maxing out the federal tax rebate available for solar system installations – and getting utilities to foot part of the remaining bill.

A Silent Power system should add about $5,000 to the cost of a typical solar installation, Headlee said. The 30-percent federal tax credit shaves that by 30 percent, leaving about $3,500 remaining – or, as Silent Power likes to frame it, about $350 per kilowatt-hour in storage capacity. That's cheaper than commercially available battery storage system today, though it's a target price for many.

Batteries count for the solar credit when linked to an inverter system, Headlee said. If Congress passes a bill proposed by Sen. Ron Wyden (D.-Ore.) that offers an energy storage equivalent tax incentives to wind and solar, that could open up the pool of financial support, he said (see Energy Bill Could Boost Storage Technologies).

Granted, the batteries won't last more than a few hours, he said. But that's enough for utilities to smooth the difference between the time that solar panels get their best output, in the mid-afternoon, and the slightly later peak demand times that are typical for utilities during hot summer afternoons as people get home from work and start turning stuff on, he said.

That demand response capacity could be worth something to utilities – perhaps, even a $3,500 rebate or incentive to homeowners to make Silent Power's system as cheap as a regular solar panel array, he suggested.

A solar-battery system would require inverter systems that can switch instantly between the two – something Silent Power's system can do, Headlee said. About 200 homes with Silent Power's units should give a utility 1 megawatt of load-shifting capacity, he estimated.

Beyond that, batteries can help smooth the big swings in solar panel generation when clouds pass overhead, he said. Spread out to neighborhood scale, such drastic ups and downs in home power demand could spell trouble for an unprepared distribution grid.

The market is huge, Headlee said. American Electric Power, for one, says it will need 1 gigawatt of storage, or 2.6 percent of generation capacity, by 2020, he noted, and California may require 4 gigawatts of storage to reach its goal of getting a third of its power from renewable resources by 2020. About 20 gigawatts of new storage would represent a $10 billion market, he said (see Green Light post).

Beyond its work with GE, Silent Power has been talking with California utilities including San Diego Gas & Electric, Southern California Edison and Sacramento Municipal Utility District, he said.

Most of California's utilities are asking the DOE for money to build grid storage, but those projects have concentrated on larger-scale storage, like a 30-megawatt lithium-ion battery Southern California Edison wants A123 Systems to build, or Pacific Gas & Electric's plan for a compressed air energy storage system (see PG&E Wants DOE Dollars for Underground Air Energy Storage and SoCal Edison Wants A123's Biggest Grid Battery Ever).

But SDG&E's proposed $212 million microgrid project, which is also seeking DOE stimulus funding, is likely to require smaller distributed energy storage systems, Headlee noted (see Balance Energy Wants to Build Microgrids, Starting With San Diego).

For now, the company plans to use lead-acid batteries with an estimated five to seven year lifespan, he said. But it's looking into lithium-ion and advanced lead-acid batteries as well, he said.

A few venture capitalists briefed on Silent Power's plans at last week's conference in Austin noted that the company might be a bit early to the market. Systems for allowing utilities to control large numbers of home-based batteries are in their infancy, though the millions of smart meters being deployed could help extend those networks, Headlee said.

In fact, smart grid startup GridPoint started out in 2003 with a similar business plan, then switched to software after finding the market too small, he said (see GridPoint Gets $120M, Buys V2Green).

But then, utilities have been running demand response programs for years, with factories and other large power users turning down their use at peak demand times, Headlee said (see Is Demand Response Doomed?)

And utilities expecting hundreds of megawatts of rooftop solar panels to be installed in their service territories may feel under the gun to put storage in place to make it an asset, rather than a grid-destabilizing liability, he said.


Interact with smart grid industry visionaries from North American utilities, innovative hardware and software vendors and leading industry consortiums at The Networked Grid on November 4 in San Francisco.

9 Comments

  • Steve Pluvia 10/20/09 8:23 AM

    If I had a dollar for every time someone said they had a cost effective battery for renewable power applications Warren Buffet would be my female dog…

    Reply
  • russ 10/20/09 8:26 AM

    Another company with an idea to get rich off the subsidy route & thanks to Wyden of Oregon.

    At least his arrowgate (a subsidy for toy arrow mfgs) didn’t cost a whole lot of money - this would get into big bucks!

    Reply
  • brian 10/23/09 2:11 PM

    Renewable generation is just another form of energy…. it has it advantages and disadvantages. One of solar’s disadvantages is the high price of a residential system (installation costs on a roof are high) and the intermittency spikes in power from minute to minute.  First, there is a dispersion factor will solar as there is with loads. The further they are spread out, the less correlated they are, which dampens the problem of intermittancy. Imagine if your load was a light… it is either on or off…..aggregate 5,000 lights and you have less of a spike. Only when we reach penetration levels great than 30-40% of solar, should we start to look for ways to time-shift the delivery of solar. On the cost front, adding an expensive battery to an expensive solar installation makes no sense today as long is there is a grid connection. I agree with Steve and Russ….this is a horrible use of subsidized dollars. Storage has its role in a few applications today (hybrid buses/UPS trucks/frequency regulation) and with costs coming down, further application will become viable.  However, this is not one of them.

    Reply
  • Mary Saunders 10/23/09 4:55 PM

    When my dad lived in the Florida Keys, he did not have a solar array, but he had battery back-up for his office.  Power there went out too often.  Frustrate an engineer too many times with his habits, and he will figure something out.  Also, they have figured out how to use batteries at the Earthships, where the covenants require not being connected to the grid.  With utilities resisting paying for any excess power, some people are going to set up their own things, after getting what rebates they can get for what is ordained by the current political power structure.  Global Weirding could be another factor in this, if power interruption becomes more common.  If people store their own, with a loop inside the house for doing so, the grid just won’t get as much unless they agree to feed-in payments to bait the excess out.  As long as there are automatic disconnects to prevent sending power out during an outage, part of an officially installed system anyway, wouldn’t most business people just shrug and understand why this would happen?

    Reply
  • edbeards 10/23/09 9:21 PM

    Somebody may know what KIND of battery Silent Power is using in their systems.  I’ve looked around a bit, and can’t find the answer.  Why so mysterious?  They did early development work many years ago on Sodium-sulfur…that’s not what they’re putting in people’s houses, is it?

    Reply
  • Todd Headlee 10/25/09 11:11 AM

    Hello everyone good comments, I am the CEO of Silent Power.  Just to clear things up for everyone, this is not a consumer play.  As noted above solar pv is already very expensive and our business model is to add add no additional cost to the consumer.  We are working with some of the largest utilities in the country to help them put their residential and commercial solar pv systems under utility control for a multitude of reasons, many of which also benefit the consumer.  By putting a small about of storage at each solar pv installation the utility can create a very power demand response capability that very cost effective versus other technologies.

    Reply
      • Eric Wesoff 10/25/09 11:34 AM

        Todd,
        Please let us know the technology being used. 
        Eric Wesoff

  • russ 10/25/09 12:50 PM

    Seems to me that if storage was practical utilities would jump on it. It is not desirable to ramp a gas turbine up and down - you want to run it in the ‘sweet spot’ for best efficiency. They could shift low use generation into peak power.

    Hydro can store power to some extent by using the reservoir - depending on stream flow and levels. My brother is an operator at a PGE generating unit in Oregon and they routinely do this.

    It is hard to understand how thousands (or hundreds of thousands) of small storage units can come close to the efficiency or cost effectiveness of large units.

    Reply
  • Todd Headlee 11/1/09 9:25 PM

    Eric,

    We used battery technology as the storage medium.  We own our own proprietary inverter technology that we developed specifically for this application.  We are working with sealed AGM lead acid and lithium ion battery technology depending on what the utility specifies.  With the sealed AGM we can get about five years of life and with lithium ion we can get up to 20 years, but at a much higher initial cost.  We are using AMI as the communication network to our device.

    Todd

    Reply
.