LEDs: A Home Invasion in Two Years?

Luminus Devices says that in two years or less, you’ll be about to buy cost-effective LED bulbs. The company also wants to replace UV lights in chemical curing shops.

We're finally moving to the main event in the lighting fight.  

"In the next 12 to 25 months, you will see $25 to $50 LED products that will blow away anything in the house," booms Keith Ward, the lighting industry veteran who took over Luminus Devices in June. "In the commercial market, they will pay for themselves a couple of times over in labor."

Light emitting diodes (LEDs) have been touted for years as ideal replacements for incandescent bulbs – a hoary piece of technology that turns 130 years old on December 31 – and even compact fluorescents. Unfortunately, quality and price have held them back. Consumers can buy screw-in LED bulbs now, but the good ones cost around $90 and the cheaper ones give off about as much light at E.T.'s finger.

Although still more costly than standard bulbs, the coming wave of LED bulbs will be cheaper in the long run because they use far less energy and last far longer. The commercial market will likely adopt them first, he added. LED bulbs might use 7 to 10 watts and last for 50,000 hours.

Policy will also prod the market. Several jurisdictions have already placed restrictions aimed at phasing out the inefficient, old and ubiquitous incandescent.  

Luminus follows a similar strategy as Bridgelux, which also predicts $25 bulbs in a few years, but gets there by different means. Bridgelux has come up with a way to package several of its LEDs under a single lens and into a single package, thereby cutting components and costs. In traditional LED arrays, each LED has its own lens and package. (Check out this video on Bridgelux's LEDs.)

By contrast, Luminus has designed a supersize LED called PhlatLight. While standard LEDs might measure 1 millimeter a side and take up a little more than a square millimeter in area, Luminus makes devices like its PT120 that can sport 12 square millimeters of light emitting surface (that's 4.6 x 2.6 millimeters). A larger LED means that fewer LEDs are needed to produce a lamp or a streetlight, which in turns leads to higher efficiencies. It's component reduction, but a different component is being reduced.

Some kind of early success in the commercial lighting market is also crucial for Luminus at this juncture. The company has raised a $139 million in VC funds, or tens of millions more than other lighting startups. Philips and General Electric, the two large facts of life in lighting, are pushing hard on LEDs and acquiring smaller companies.

Additionally, Luminus can't participate in one of the strongest markets for LEDs: LCD screens. TV and computer makers build their arrays out of smaller LEDs, not honkers like PhlatLight. "It is not conducive to TVs and notebooks," he said. So far, most of its design wins have been for projectors.

Ward came to the company in May as part of reorganization. He's there because he has a deep rolodex after working in lighting for the last few decades.

Besides general lighting, Luminus has begun to study new markets. As part of the reorg, it created a division to see if LEDs could replace UV lights for curing paints and chemicals in industrial shops.

"It is a done deal. It is going to happen because you can dial in a wavelength. You can optimize drying," he said. LEDs also can't burst, like UV lights.

The chemical lighting market, however, likely only accounts for tens of millions in sales a year. Approximately $5 billion worth of light bulbs get sold in the U.S. a year.

Another potential market: aviation. The landing lights on planes are quartz halogen devices that can cost hundreds of dollars and break.

"If I can take a filament product out and put in a chip, that changes the whole world because nothing can break."

Comments [8]

  • Steve Pluvia 08/4/09 2:32 PM

    $18 LED’s that replace 200 watt flood bulbs are already available at Costco…

    Reply
      • Michael Kanellos 08/4/09 3:47 PM

        You’ll have to point them out so someone can try them. So far the only decent ones I’ve seen cost around $90. And that is for a 100 watt replacement. Not a 200. There are some bulbs out there but light quality isn’t tgreat. But prove me wrong.

  • james cormican 08/4/09 5:16 PM

    great piece, thank you.  I use all LED lighting in my home.  it started as a goofy experiment, that was kind of expensive.  there are two bulbs that I can declare as my favorites.  the c crane geobulb white, and the ge par 20 with black plastic casing are the best i have come across so far.  i can turn every light on in the place and draw less than 100W, although many of mine are older 3w bulbs that are very blue in color.  keep up the good work

    Reply
      • Eric Wesoff 08/4/09 5:55 PM

        James,
        What is the color quality of the LED light?  And what do the other people in your home think of the light color?  Especially interested in the female-Americans in the house’s opinion?

      • Eric Wesoff 08/7/09 11:03 PM

        Well played on the girlfriend comment.  Thanks for the response.

  • Steve Pluvia 08/4/09 5:25 PM

    Mike—search on the costco website for “LED”; go to second page on the search results.  You will find several LED offerings from “Four Seasons”:  Note the “Par 38” 3 pack for $79.  If you google four seasons lighting you’ll get a much different price than shown at costco.  As I recall the floods are not 200 watt replacement lighting, more like 100 or less, but most flood’s are 200 watt (thus my comment earlier).  If you try these—let me know how they work.  I find costco sometimes sells a discontinued line from various suppliers so this might be a discontinued line from Four Seasons thus the cheaper price.

    http://www.costco.com/Common/Search.aspx?Dx=mode+matchallpartial&whse=BC&Ne=4000000&Ntx=mode+matchallpartial&Nty=1&Dr=P_CatalogName:BC&N=5000043&cm_re=1_en-_-Top_Left_Nav-_-Top_search&No=16&Ntk=Text_Search&Nr=P_CatalogName:BC&lang=en-US&D=led&search=led&Ntt=led&topnav;=


    Then here on the four seasons site….

    http://www.fourseasonslighting.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=3_24&products_id=120

    Note: on the four season’s site they’re $165 ea for the “Par 38” vs 3 for $79 at Costco… I haven’t tried them out yet and I see on the four season’s site they claim to produce 75-85 watts of replacement lighting (not the 200 I mentioned). Let us know how they work if you get some.

    Reply
      • james cormican 08/5/09 3:41 PM

        well, for one , my girlfriend is a saint.  beyond that, i work for altestore.com so the project started as product trials, but i really got into it.  my friends are like minded renewable energy types for the most part, so they are into it as well, but it is a noticeable light color diference.  we have to turn every light on in the place, and overcome the blue and dim lights with more lamps, and specifically multi-socket lamps.  nobody will accuse me of being the next design star with the lighting or lamp selection, but it is a great experiment, especially considering that i interface with energy conscious and potentially off grid folks all day long.  when dealing with “normal” consumer types, i tell them to mix in one led with other cfls in a multi socket lamp, and the bulbs can go incognito.  the higher end bulbs like the ccrane geobulb and the ge par 20 that i mentioned can substitute just about 1 to 1 for their incandescent or halogen can light counterparts respectively.  none of them like dimmers or enclosed fixtures.  in the two years i have tried to have as many led lights as possible, the prices have halved, and although warranty claims are somewhat common, they have all been honored without hassle.  hope that helps, eric

.