Energy Storage: McPhy’s Hope for Hydrogen

Venture capital firms still hold some hope for hydrogen storage.

Energy Storage: McPhy’s Hope for Hydrogen

Venture capital firm Sofinnova Partners led a $17.1 million investment in France-based McPhy Energy, which is working to commercialize solid-state hydrogen storage technology.  Soffinova was joined by private equity firms Gimv and Amundi in the funding process.  This investment follows a $2 million round in 2009 from investors Emertec and Areva.

McPhy was founded in 2008 and is focused on developing and bringing to market technology for practical, reversible and low-pressure solid storage of hydrogen in the form of magnesium hydride.  Storage in the form of magnesium hydride has been investigated at length but has yet to reach commercial scale, performance and price.

Hydrogen has long been the subject of research as an energy feedstock to power fuel cells and vehicles.  The technology works, but storing and transporting the hydrogen has always been the bottleneck in mass commercialization.  Because it is such a light gas, practical storage requires intense compression and high-mass, high-strength storage vessels.  Storage of hydrogen in liquid form is even less practical because of extremely low temperatures and high cost. Still, hydrogen has the highest energy density per kilogram in comparison with other combustible fuels, hence the interest in the element (see chart).

Hydrogen has almost three times the energy content of gasoline (120MJ/kg vs. 44MJ/kg), but the low density of H2 gas means low volumetric energy content.  Hydrogen is abundant, but it exists only in the form of compounds.

Another firm that has been conducting research on hydrogen storage is engineered-carbon startup EnerG2, which raised $3.5M to develop nanoscale materials for ultracapacitors for EVs, PHEVs, and for hydrogen storage.  Here's a perspective piece on storage from the firm. 

McPhy envisions the use of its storage technology in tandem with a renewable energy source like solar to power an electrolyzer, which then produces hydrogen for fuel cell energy production or to spin a turbine.

 

Research in Metal Hydrides

Sandia is leading the Metal Hydride Center of Excellence in looking to reach the goals that the DOE has set for hydrogen storage through the development of reversible metal hydrides materials.

Although Steve Chu and the DOE have slowed down hydrogen research in favor of our current energy policy (that's a joke, by the way; we don't have an energy policy), hydrogen fuel and storage is alive and well in research labs.  There is still a community of scientists laboring to improve performance and discover materials to enable the hydrogen highway.

Metal hydrides represent a class of materials with volumetric densities higher than gaseous or liquid hydrogen that could enable effective solid state hydrogen storage.  There is a DOE hydrogen storage program with stated goals, but according to a presentation by Sunita Satyapal of the DOE, "No [hydrogen] technology meets targets."  Here's a link to a long list of DOE publications on hydrogen research.

This remains complex stuff and heady materials science.  Some of the more promising materials being investigated are complex metal hydrides, including metal alanates, amides, borohydrides and their derivatives.  The DOE wants a reversible 5.5% hydrogen storage system, and according to Stavila, "As of now, none of the materials investigated so far satisfy all of the DOE targets."

There is also a time factor involved in getting these materials to absorb and release hydrogen.  Despite significant improvements in the storage capacity, most of the hydride materials still require high temperatures to decompose and release their hydrogen.

Innovation in Hydrogen Sources

Michael Kanellos recently reported on a virus that makes hydrogen and I covered Sun Catalytix, a VC-funded company looking to inexpensively electrolyze water.

Early-stage startup Pilus Energy makes a microbial fuel cell which produces hydrogen gas and DC electricity from the metabolism of organic materials by genetically engineered bacteria.  Feedstocks for the Pilus bioreactor are organic compounds found in waterways, plant pulps, farm wastes and sewage.  A video illustrating this concept is here.

A Quick Review of Utility-Scale Energy Storage Technologies

Utility-scale energy storage in the field today is limited to pumped hydro, a few large deployments using compressed air energy storage (CAES), hundreds of megawatts of sodium sulphur (NaS) batteries, mostly in Japan, and some experiments with banks of lithium-ion batteries, nickel-cadmium batteries and regenerative fuel cells (flow batteries).

Improvements in batteries, fuel cells, hydrogen storage, ultracapacitors, molten salt, flywheels, phase-change materials, SMES, etc., will come from incremental advances in materials science.  Although a "black swan" breakthrough would be most welcome in this field, we are dealing with the limits of known elements, compounds and physics.  Maybe some revolutionary advance will rock our paradigms, but for now, improvements in energy storage will come from hard, slow work in the labs of materials scientists.

A few firms are looking into energy storage via ammonia synthesis.  The concept is to use energy generated by remote or offshore wind turbines to perform "solid-state ammonia synthesis" and transport that ammonia by land or sea to be used as a fuel.  This obviates the need for distant wind farms to be expensively connected to the grid. 

Doty Energy wants to use off-peak wind energy to efficiently synthesize fuels, like gasoline and diesel, from CO2 and water.  According to the company founder, David Doty, strong arguments for the concept include: (1) the energy storage density in stable liquid fuels is two orders of magnitude greater than the energy storage density in batteries, (2) the energy stored in liquid fuels can then be used seamlessly within our current transportation infrastructure, and (3) the chemical processes being developed promise the scalability needed to competitively replace petroleum-based fuels.  Doty's process electrolyzes water and combines the generated hydrogen with CO in a Fischer-Tropsch process to produce the liquid fuels.

Amongst the many energy storage technologies we've covered:

Kawasaki is looking to deploy nickel metal hydride (NiMH) technology for grid-scale energy storage applications. NiMH is good at fast-charge and fast-discharge applications versus, say, sodium sulfur NaS technology, which is good for projects that require massive capacity, but is limited by its six-hour charge cycles and high operating temperatures.

Gravel-based thermal storage from Isentropic Energy -- Thermal Energy Storage Breakthrough?

Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES): part 1, part 2, part 3  

Ice -- Ice-based thermal storage, also from Cryogel

Ultracapacitors -- Maxwell and the Promise of Ultracapacitors 

New flywheel technology from Velkess.

If I've missed any storage technologies, or if you're an entreprenuer with a new idea -- please comment below or get in touch with me at wesoff@greentechmedia.com.

9 Comments

  • Carl Hage 07/6/10 2:12 PM

    But what is the cost/kWh (for 4 or 8 hours/day of storage)? What is the round trip efficiency? The weight doesn’t matter, but land use does. (Is it small enough and can it be placed anywhere, e.g. at a substation?)

    Using energy density/kg is mostly irrelevant for utility power storage. (In a vehicle you have to move around the weight, so it matters.) Round trip efficiency (kWh-out/kWh-in) is very important, particularly since H2 storage is typically very low (very wasteful). Cost ($/kWh and $/W for grid-stabilization) matters most, then perhaps footprint (m2-land/MWh).

    Using kWh/kg for H2 shows just the most favorable and most irrelevant metric. Typical efficiency of an electrolyzer is 50% (but in theory much higher—say 90%) and fuel cell 50% (Bloom’s is 52%), so typical round trip will be about 25% or maybe 50% in the future. Contrast that to battery, flywheel, or thermal storage which might be 85%. Unless the waste heat is needed with cogeneration, H2 is a very poor storage method.

    Cost is the main problem for most all storage technologies—it’s often cheaper to built a second power plant and turn it on when needed than store. Conventional deep-cycle lead acid batteries are cheap (~$150/kWh) and some analysis has shown them to be cost-competitive with typical gas peaking plants. Even the most expensive Li batteries are still cheaper than fuel cells (for 5 hours/day usage), independent of 2-3x more input energy cost.

    Land use is another important factor. Pumped hydro storage is limited to certain geologically favorable places to create an upper and lower reservoir. But a typical pumped hydro station has a kWh/m2-water 10X larger than a building with batteries, and 100X more kWh/m2-total-land than a battery system. (A 30mx30m building could hold a 50MW/200MWh battery system, and is small enough to be located at substations.)

    Large-scale battery storage is almost cost effective (compared to peaker plants) now, so it would seem like further research and market development would reduce costs more.

    The Isentropic Energy thermal storage and Velkess glass-fiber flywheel storage approaches both look very interesting to me as possible approaches to lower $/kWh. The land-use required is comparable to battery systems and small enough to be placed at substations.

    I don’t have statistics on compressed air storage, but sighting could be a problem as well. The underground chamber also acts like a giant heat-pump (energy is transferred into the ground, i.e. lost), so it now mainly used in conjunction with gas turbines, and simple configurations (without heat storage and regeneration) have a poor round trip efficiency.

    Demand shifting (e.g. use ice created at night for daytime cooling) could be the most cost effective solution, just as energy efficiency can be cheaper than new power. But with flat rate billing, there is no incentive for consumers to shift demand.

    Reply
  • glenn2ns 07/6/10 3:29 PM

    email enroute

    Reply
  • Jim Jonas 07/6/10 4:45 PM

    Now I know Chu cut the budget do you think Hydrogen fuel is really more expensive and truly is more exspensive than other products? So hydrogen electric cells ?

    Reply
  • Lawrence Weisdorn 07/6/10 8:25 PM

    With an ability to be transported and dispensed similar to that of kerosene, liquid hydrides will be the ultimate carrier for hydrogen on transportation vehicles.

    Reply
  • Gere Johansing 07/6/10 11:41 PM

    How did you miss the fact that methanol can be reformed to produced hydrogen and is arguably the best of all hydrogen carriers. One gallon of methanol can be reformed to produce the same amount of hydrogen stored in 1.4 gallons of liquid hydrogen.

    Reply
  • Arno A. Evers 07/7/10 5:08 AM

    Hydrogen should be used as an energy carrier, made only out of renewble energy. The next question is: Which process to apply? The best efficiency can be gained in using the thermal splitting of water (H2O) by means of Concentrated Solar Power (CPS) into Hydrogen (H2) and Oxygen (O2). This process was successfuly developed in Europe (funded by European Commision) under the Project name: HYDROSOL I and II. It is able to make the equivalent of 100kWth of hydrogen.

    HYDROSOL IIID just started, aiming for 1MWth of hydrogen.

    More about this in the new book: The Hydrogen Society…more than just a Vision? ISBN-13: 978-3937863313 available at Amazon or your local bookstore.
    Go to: http://www.hydrogenambassadors.com/the-hydrogen-society-more-than-just-a-vision.html

    Reply
  • GEECEE 07/7/10 8:14 AM

    I wonder about the long run viability of hydrogen as a transportation fuel. Reason being that the technology to utilize it is very expensive to acquire ( I read a Ballard heavy duty fuel cell cost almost $1,000,000) and the level of engineering required to keep it maintain is costly with engineers from Ballard on service contract to do so.  Without the necessary eco-system in place I am not sure I see a bright future for hydrogen outside the industrial sector.

    Reply
  • Jim Jonas 11/16/10 9:45 AM

    We still are not thinking about Hydro Cell Solar plants for Utilities.Anymore thoughts on this subject.

    Reply
Need an avatar? Get one here: Gravatar