• Monday, September 28, 2009 Latest Update: 3:38PM

Greentech Solar

German Election Leads to 2010 Boom for Solar?

The newly elected center-right coalition could cut the country’s solar incentive, causing developers to hurry up and complete their projects before new policy is in place. 

A federal election in Germany on Sunday has produced a new set of ruling political parties, but the fate of its popular solar incentive program remains murky.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel's Christian Democratic Union won big along with the Free Democratic Party, which in the past has called for a dramatic cut to the feed-in tariff that has turned Germany into the world's largest solar market.

The Free Democrat Party (FDP) has a strong pro-nuclear power bent, which could lead to energy policies that shifts focus and resources away from solar, said analysts Monday.

Even so, some analysts say it's too early to tell how soon the new coalition would shrink the program and by how much.

"While the FDP is generally anti government subsidy spending, our proprietary contacts suggest that the FDP's position is to monitor the 2010 [feed-in tariff] before it suggests any policy changes (FIT cuts) and if warranted lower the solar FIT for 2011," wrote Jesse Pichel, senior research analyst with Piper Jaffray, in a research note.

Without some clarity on what the new government would do, solar companies and investors could hurry up to get projects completed by the end of 2010 if not much sooner.

"The timing of [the feed-in tariff] changes is impossible to gauge at this point. Expectations of this could drive demand in Germany in 10e (demand pulled-forward)," said Alexander Karnick, an analyst with Deutsche Bank, in a research note. "However, mid-term implications are clearly negative for the sector."

The feed-in tariff policy, which requires utilities to buy solar power at a premium pricing, calls for lowering the solar pricing each year. The idea is that the costs of manufacturing and installing solar energy systems should go down as the market grows.

It was only last year when the government set a pricing schedule for the next few years. The decision came after a big brouhaha over whether it should cut the solar prices by as much as 30 percent (see Solar Prices Set in Germany). The schedule would set a pricing decline of roughly 10 percent per year.

Before the election, chatter from people in the industry raised the possibility of seeing a greater price decline in 2010 than what was in place (see German Solar Incentives in Jeopardy?).

Some political leaders believe the solar industry doesn't need such a hefty subsidy to continue its growth. Fierce competition from Chinese solar panel makers, who have benefited nicely from the solar policy, also has led to a call for a more dramatic cut to the feed-in tariff (see Suntech to SolarWorld: Careful What You Wish For).

The possibility of a sharper cut in 2010 still remains. Solar panel makers have had to cut the selling prices of their products by 30 percent to 50 percent over the past year as the price of silicon dropped significantly. These changes took place after the government revised the feed-in tariff last year.

As a result, those who install solar energy systems and ink power sales contracts this year are due to get a fatter profit than previously expected. This phenomenon could prompt the government to reset the solar pricing sooner.

Comments [10]

  • Bill Woods 09/28/09 4:17 PM

    “The company said its plant will require industry subsidies, specially an Ontario feed-in tariff with a 20-year contract price of $190 per MWh.”

    That doesn’t sound like the basis for a boom. How many such can people afford?

    Reply
  • FlavorSavor 09/28/09 4:58 PM

    Any comment on the Gordon Johnson piece in Barron’s? How likely is it for polysilicon to get down to $25-28/kg next year. If poly get down that low, where would factory gate panel prices go? Low enough to stay ahead of the falling incentives?

    Reply
  • Ucilia Wang 09/28/09 5:32 PM

    For those who haven’t read the Barron’s article, here is a link:
    http://online.barrons.com/article_email/SB125391752825642267-lMyQjAxMDI5NTIzNjkyMTY3Wj.html?page=2

    Reply
      • StevePluvia 09/30/09 9:42 AM

        Uci, thanks for the link to Gordon’s interview.  I’ve said for some time Gordon is a hack; his research is lazy, his iq is low and he’s more interested in wearing a suit than following the industry he’s paid to know.  The most glaring error in his current thinking is his claim

        “photovoltaic-module prices of $1.80-to-$1.50 by the end of this year.”

        Apparently Gordon missed the supply/demand part of Econ 101; Here’s the reality: anything $1.80/watt or lower spikes demand rapidly swallowing up all product at that price.  There are only a handful of mfgrs who can sell at $1.80 or lower so the supply at low prices is tiny.  As such, FSLR will remain the only mfgr producing at max capacity with hi margins.

        $1.50 asp’s for modules by year end?  LOL please go back to the golf course Gordon.

  • russ 09/29/09 4:45 AM

    The problem in Germany is trying to compete with China on a commodity. Never happen! The Germans are world class at engineering and precision work but production line items are overly expensive.

    The FDP sees no reason to use German money to stimulate the Chinese economy - better ways for the funds to be spent at home.

    Reply
  • JoeJoe 09/29/09 10:29 AM

    Do you think there’s anything more to the nationalistic rhetoric than posturing?

    Check this report out.

    http://en.solarwirtschaft.de/fileadmin/content_files/Faktenblatt_PV_EN_sep09.pdf

    Highlights include: Net installed costs in Germany are down about 25% (4216 vs 3263 EUR/kWp) since the end of 2008. The declining prices are good for consumers and installations are expected to climb about 20% this year. The installers must like the current situation.

    The 2000 MW that BSW forecasts is already well ahead of the revised EEG’s target coridoor for 2009, 2010 and 2011 so I would think the architects of the EEG are going to rejigger thier formulas in early 2010. Anyone know they don’t set the thing up like California’s stepped system and have the rate go down incrementally after each 2000 MW?

    Reply
  • Cleanthinking 09/30/09 4:23 AM

    The german vote isn’t very useful for the german Cleantech companys. But the other parties like Gruene and SPD are strong enough to help solar firms and other cleantech companies.

    Reply
  • Paul 10/12/09 7:19 PM

    I think you’re right on in regards to FDP not wanting German money to goto subsidized non-German(Chinese) companies.

    Reply
.