Contract Silicon Price Falls 50%, Close to Spot Price

Many solar cell and panel makers have renegotiated or canceled contracts, leading to prices that make it possible for panel makers to sell their products at below $2 per watt, said New Energy Finance.

Prices for silicon and the resulting wafers have fallen so fast that major solar panel makers could afford to sell their products at below $2 per watt and still "make a small profit," according to New Energy Finance on Tuesday.

The price for long-term silicon contracts has fallen about 50 percent this year from a year ago and come close to the spot market price of $67 per kilogram, or about $0.50 per watt, said the London-based research firm.

Blame the increase of silicon supply at a time when demand has dived significantly. The credit crunch has made it difficult for developers to borrow money for installing large solar energy projects in Europe and the United States, two key markets. The silicon is turned into ingots and made into wafers. Solar cells use the wafers to make their products, which are then assembled into panels that can be seen on rooftops today. 

Many solar wafer and cell makers who signed long-term contracts in 2007 and 2008 have either renegotiated or canceled their contracts. These companies inked those agreements when silicon fetched $300 per kilogram on the spot market and $150 per kilogram for long-term contracts, New Energy Finance said.

Silicon makers mostly sell their material under long-term contracts. But the spot market prices provide good indicators of the price fluctuation and market conditions, information that solar cell makers would use in contract negotiations.

Silicon manufacturing costs for major producers such as Wacker-Chemie, Hemlock and Tokuyama are estimated to be about $30 to $35 per kilogram.

The sharp pricing declines have exerted the most impact on China-based silicon producers and other newcomers, the research firm said. 

Not surprisingly, wafer makers have suffered, too. Many of their customers also have demanded to renegotiate contracts or simply canceled them all together.

The spot market price for multicrystalline silicon wafers fell to $3.44 per piece this month, or $0.93 per watt, New Energy Finance said. For contracts that require deliver in 2009, the medium price has fallen to at least $5.89 per piece.

Overall, the medium price for existing contracts has reached $5.25 per piece, and that's expected to fall as more negotiations take place.

LDK Solar, a silicon wafer maker in China, for example, expects to take a second-quarter inventory write-down of $150 million to $160 million. It also anticipates a net loss of $180 million to $200 million for the second quarter, the company said last week.

Germany-based Q-Cells, one of the world's largest solar cell maker, recently reported a 37 percent decline in second-quarter revenue (See Q-Cells: Market Still Tanks, 2Q Sales Fell 37%).

Solar project developers should be benefiting from all these price declines, which make it possible for large solar panel makers to sell their ware at below $2 per watt. That's half the panel price in 2008, New Energy Finance said. That price also would bring silicon panels much closer to the price for First Solar's cadmium-telluride panels. 

First Solar, based in Tempe, Ariz., has regularly publicized its production costs to show that it could make panels cheaper than anyone else. First Solar's production cost during the first quarter of this year was $0.93 per watt, the company said.  

But the company is facing tougher competition these days, and some analysts are expecting the company to lose its market share to silicon panel makers.  

Project developers are still largely crippled by the credit crunch. Investors said they are seeing signs of improvements, though more visible changes aren't likely to take place until 2010 (see Reality Check: How Much Impact Can the Feds Have on Solar?).

 

9 Comments

  • bp 07/29/09 1:35 PM

    Insightful article. Do you know of a source for a graphic display of costs throughout the value chain, i.e. silicon mining/refining, wafer costs, cell costs, module assembly costs, BOS costs.

    I thought this was in a previous report.
    Thanks

    Reply
  • Henning Jacobsen 08/7/09 11:28 AM

    $2 per W appears to be referring to the installed Cost? Further down in the text:  The spot market price for multi-crystalline silicon wafers fell to $3.44 per piece this month (what is a piece of Silicon?), or $0.93 per watt of manufacturing Cost$?  (i.e. Installed cost approx. 2 x $0.93 = $.1.86 ~ $2.00). Is this logic correct or am I missing something?

    30 July 2009 in article about First Solar

    The company reportedly is selling its panels at below $2 per watt while silicon panel makers are selling theirs at roughly $2.25 to $2.50 per watt - are these Manufacturing Costs that should be multiplied by 2 to reach Installd Cost? Why is Silicon in 28 July Article listed at $2 W and in the First Solar Article, twodays later - listed at roughly $2.25 to $2.50 W?

    Reply
      • JoeJoe 08/7/09 1:04 PM

        -$2/Watt refers to the module price. i.e. the panel price that the consumer pays
        -A piece of silicon is a silicon wafer. Multi-crystalline wafers are square and have a galvanized steel pattern. Single/Mono-crystalline wafers are psuedo-square and have a flat gray color (before processing).
        -Each manufacturer reports costs differently to exploit what they want to advertise. For example, Suntech reports non-silicon costs of around 65 cents/watt. Non-silicon costs (for Suntech) are everything past the wafer. This include steps like cell metalization and encapsulation. Add up the silicon and non-silicon costs to come to a module cost. Add some profit to get to a module price.
        -Be careful comparing silicon costs from one manufacturer to another because they could be talking about different quantities.
        -Installed costs depend on a many factors. You can’t use a thumbrule to generically estimate the installed costs.

      • Ucilia Wang 08/11/09 2:04 PM

        Hi Henning, my article on silicon says solar panel makers COULD sell their panels at below $2/watt and still make a small profit. The $2.25 to $2.50/watt figures are the general pricing for what silicon panels are going for these days, based on numbers from analysts and installers.

  • Henning Jacobsen 08/7/09 3:10 PM

    In the event one is a secondary manufacturer making Silicon Solar Panels, I can understand that the Wafer Cost and the way it is presented is an important measure, but it has to have a relationship to the final Installed Cost offered to the ultimate Customer - for Solar PV what will this factor be?  (even approx. factor will do)

    A relationship between wafer raw material cost (W) and the Installed cost (Wp) should be established in the interest of all parties throughout the supply chain.

    In the interest of succeeding as an Industry there should be standards for material output for all types of materials?  Is this blog only addressing the Manufacturers?  I have noticed that all Solar PV Panel manufacturers are vey cagy about their Prices and the amount of Panels it takes to achieve a desired output - one that the Customer want to know.

    Am I the only one that thinks this is short-sighted?

    Why over a span of two days does different article state Silicon with three different prices $2 per watt claim, and in another a $2.25 to $2.50 per watt claim - I assume this is Manufacturing costs - so what will these inconstant prices mean to the success of attracting more Customers?

    Reply
      • Ucilia Wang 08/12/09 10:30 AM

        JoeJoe, the $2/watt is not the price consumers would pay. It’s the wholesale price, and doesn’t take into account a company’s administrative and other general expenses.

  • JoeJoe 08/7/09 11:10 PM

    Traditionally we’ve heard that installed costs will be about double the cost of the panels but I don’t think this thumbrule is useful anymore. PV is driven by the Sun so each location will have to be adjusted for local insolation levels. Then you have to factor in the competitiveness of the installation market in the area and various factors like local wealth, local regulations/incentives and electricity prices. Then throw in the effect of contracts which were negotiated years ago and slow price adjustments down. Then throw in some macroeconomic spin that effects lending for good measure… All these things feedback on each other in a complex way that can’t easily be jiggered into a thumbrule.

    We’re seeing movement in prices across all portions of the production/installation chain. The dynamic state of affairs does not lend itself to a distillation.

    Reply
  • JoeJoe 08/12/09 1:21 PM

    Thanks Ucilia… Wholesalers vs. end-users. Point taken. I think the accounting can go either way. First Solar reports $/Watt as their manufacturing costs only. i.e. admin costs are not included. Suntech on the other hand reports fully loaded $/Watt costs (non-silicon costs only). My understanding is that “fully loaded” costs include administrative expenses. I don’t know what they are paying for wafers but it will be less than $1/watt in the not too distant future if it isn’t already. Even with some legacy contracts holding costs up I still figure Suntech’s “fully loaded costs” are under $2/Watt.

    Reply
.