• Friday, August 21, 2009 Latest Update: 6:33PM

Greentech Solar

BrightSource Snags Chevron Deal in Stealthy Move Into Solar Steam

The startup, known for its huge contracts to build solar thermal power plants for utilities, now does installations for solar steam.

BrightSource Energy has landed its first-ever project to use its solar thermal technology for steam generation.

The Oakland, Calif.-based startup said Friday it has been tapped by Chevron to build a 29-megawatt thermal plant at Chevron's oil field in central California, said Keely Wachs, a spokesman for BrightSource.

BrightSource is better known as the startup that has inked 2.6 gigawatts worth of deals with California utilities to sell them electricity by building solar thermal power plants (see BrightSource, PG&E Sign 1.31GW Deal in California).

The solar thermal power market and solar thermal steam market rely on the same core ideas and technology: mirrors concentrate heat from the sun onto water in a container. The water then turns to steam. In a power plant, though, the steam gets piped into a turbine to generate electricity. In an industrial steam project, the steam is used directly to clean equipment, pump liquids from the ground or kill germs. Industrial steam projects are also significantly smaller and don't require the same sort of permitting headaches. Cutting out the generator, of course, additionally shaves costs.

"It gives us an opportunity for this potentially lucrative secondary market and help Chevron with carbon reduction," Wachs said.

BrightSource isn't alone in pursuing opportunities beyond power generation. Abengoa, which has built solar thermal power plants in Spain, has constructed a 2.4-megawatt solar thermal plant for Frito-Lay to make potato and corn chips in Modesto, Calif.

Mountain View, Calif.-based Ausra, which started off as a power plant builder and producer, changed its business plan in the past year to focus on supplying its solar thermal equipment to industrial operations such as coal mines and food processing plants. Pasadena, Calif.-based eSolar will also sell equipment to industrial partners.

BrightSource began working on the project for Chevron in June, Wachs said. But Chevron didn't discuss it publicly until Thursday night, when it presented the project at a Coalinga City Council meeting. Chevron's oil field is near the city, within Fresno County.

Chevron has relied on natural gas-powered equipment to generate steam, which is pumped into wells for heating up the petroleum to make it easier to extract.

The oil giant is turning to solar thermal partly because the location is flat and gets lots of sun, a Chevron executives said at the council meeting (via Reuters). UPDATE: Chevron will continue to rely on natural gas to power steam production, however. The solar steam project is meant to demonstrate the technology -- Chevron will evaluate the project's performance and decide if it would build solar steam plants for other oil fields, said Kim Copelin, a spokeswoman for Chevron Technology Ventures, via an email.

Chevron also has invested in BrightSource via its Chevron Technology Ventures.

BrightSource plans to install 3,800 heliostats, each of which is consisted of two mirrors mounted on a tracker, on a 100-acre site owned by Chevron. Wachs declined to disclose the cost of the project, which is scheduled to come online in late 2010 or early 2011. 

BrightSource has pursued the Chevron project for over a year, he said. The project not only opens a new market for the solar thermal company, it also gives it a showcase for its equipment in America.

The company already has built a 6-megawatt demonstration plant in Israel to showcase its technology. But most of its power plant projects are in California and undergoing federal and state regulatory review. Rival eSolar, meanwhile, already has a 5-megawatt plant in the United States.

BrightSource plans to build the power projects in phases, starting with a 100-megawatt plant in the Mojave Desert. The company is farther along than just about anyone in securing permits to build solar thermal power plants in the California desert.

Construction could start before the end of the year, though it's more likely to be in early 2010, Wachs said. The company has applied for a loan guarantee to finance some of its power projects, though it hasn't said how much it's looking for.

Earlier this week, the California Public Utilities Commission approved two power purchase agreements between BrightSource and PG&E. 

 

Image courtesy of BrightSource Energy.

Comments [3]

  • Solar Guy 08/25/09 11:43 AM

    This is a tiny show piece project.  At 29 MWth peak it delivers only 42% of the annual energy that a single 62.5 MMBtu/hr gas fired steam generator typically used for this purpose in the California oil patch does.  Chevron operates hundreds of these 62.5 MMBtu gas fired steam generators in California - so this is a drop in the bucket. Capital cost will be at least an order of magnitude higher for this pittance of solar energy relative to the $1.5M price tag of the conventional gas fired steam generator. Chevron is only doing this project because of their investment in BS in my opinion.  They have wisely chosen to keep the project small since solar tower systems are expensive and there is no way that the cost of energy from a solar tower system can EVER compete with the price that Chevron pays for the natural gas they use for oil recovery.  It is an unecomic project. This is the second project of this kind as well.  The first was done in the early 1980s by ARCO in McKittrick, CA.  I am sure the boys at BS will proclaim it to be the first, though, if an when it is completed…  That’s just how the folks in the Solar business are they can’t avoid the breathless hype.

    Reply
  • fireofenergy 08/26/09 12:45 PM

    So what is the best form of baseload renewable energy? I think it would have to be very large power towers with very large molten salt heat reservoirs. Or would it be CAES? What about making batteries or supercaps a lot cheaper on a utility mass production scale (along with PV and wind).

    We better quickly find the “best” solution and act fast once we do!

    Reply
  • Sid 09/3/09 10:16 PM

    “Capital cost will be at least an order of magnitude higher for this pittance of solar energy relative to the $1.5M price tag of the conventional gas fired steam generator.”
    Not quite. The real value of solar steam should be compared not on capital cost basis, but by including the gas utilized over lifetime by conventional generator and then discounted back accordingly. Add it to the capex and THEN compare with Solar. you’d be surprised with the results. Also, the escalation in gas price along with inflation should be accounted in your analysis—- that’s the reality of oil & gas markets. Once can get crazy to incorporate further costs associated with gas procurement (adminstration, contracts, legal penalties, hazards, insurance etc.) The REAL value of solar steam will be thus demonstrated.

    Reply
.