Energy Storage Medley: Hydrogen, CAES, Li-ion, NaS, NiCad…

Renewable portfolio standards might be unachievable without energy storage technology.  Here’s a medley of storage topics and links.

Energy Storage Medley: Hydrogen, CAES, Li-ion, NaS, NiCad…

Energy storage remains one of the missing pieces of a widespread renewable energy future.

Despite Amory Lovins' arguable claim that renewables in tandem with energy efficiency can serve as effective baseload power, we absolutely need a larger role for energy storage to make renewables effective.  And, Mr. Lovins, please note, for the foreseeable future -- we still need fossil fuels and nuclear power.  

Many Storage Technologies, Many Applications

Utility-scale energy storage in the field today is limited to pumped hydro, a few large deployments using compressed air energy storage (CAES), hundreds of megawatts of sodium sulphur (NaS) batteries, mostly in Japan, and some experiments with banks of lithium-ion batteries, nickel-cadmium batteries and regenerative fuel cells (flow batteries).

Improvements in batteries, fuel cells, hydrogen storage, ultracapacitors, flywheels, phase-change materials, SMES, etc., will come from incremental advances in materials science.  Although a black swan would be most welcome in this field, we are dealing with the limits of known elements, compounds and physics.  Maybe some revolutionary advance will rock our paradigms, but for now, improvements in energy storage will come from hard, slow work in the labs of materials scientists.

A few firms are looking into energy storage via ammonia synthesis.  The concept is to use energy generated by remote or offshore wind turbines to perform "solid-state ammonia synthesis" and transport that ammonia by land or sea to be used as a fuel.  This obviates the need for distant wind farms to be expensively connected to the grid. 

Doty Energy wants to use off-peak wind energy to efficiently synthesize fuels, like gasoline and diesel, from CO2 and water.  According to the company founder, David Doty, strong arguments for the concept include: (1) the energy storage density in stable liquid fuels is two orders of magnitude greater than the energy storage density in batteries, (2) the energy stored in liquid fuels can then be used seamlessly within our current transportation infrastructure, and (3) the chemical processes being developed promise the scalability needed to competitively replace petroleum-based fuels.  Doty's process electrolyzes water and combines the generated hydrogen with CO in a Fischer-Tropsch process to produce the liquid fuels.

Amongst the many energy storage technologies we've covered:

Gravel-based thermal storage from Isentropic Energy -- Thermal Energy Storage Breakthrough?

Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) part 1, part 2, part 3  

Ice -- Ice-based thermal storage, also from Cryogel

Ultracapacitors -- Maxwell and the Promise of Ultracapacitors

And since there are a variety of flavors of utility-scale storage applications -- frequency control, load levelling, peak shaving, spinning reserve, etc. -- different applications will call for different technologies. Grid storage could be an $8 billion market by 2016.

Energy Storage Policy

Technology isn't the only element spurring on energy storage -- policy is an accelerant, as well.  As reported last week, AB 2514, supported by California Assembly representative Nancy Skinner and state Attorney General and gubernatorial candidate Jerry Brown, will require utilities to obtain 2.25% of their peak power from storage systems by 2014 and 5% of their peak power from storage by 2020. 

Here's an article by Rep Jay Inslee, the Democratic Congressional Representative from Washington, on The New Storage Economy.

The Hydrogen Highway is Not Dead.     

Vitalie Stavila of Sandia National Labs presented at a conference last week on the technical progress of using complex metal hydrides for reversible hydrogen storage.

Sandia is leading the Metal Hydride Center of Excellence looking to reach the goals that the DOE has set for hydrogen storage through the development of reversible metal hydrides materials.

Although Steve Chu and the DOE have slowed down hydrogen research in favor of our current energy policy (that's a joke, we don't have an energy policy), hydrogen fuel and storage is alive and well in research labs.  There is still a community of scientists laboring to improve performance and discover materials to enable the hydrogen highway.

Hydrogen has almost three times the energy content of gasoline (120MJ/kg vs. 44MJ/kg), but the low density of H2 gas means low volumetric energy content.  Hydrogen is abundant, but it exists only in the form of compounds.  And volumetric compression and storage remain problematic.

Metal hydrides represent a class of materials with volumetric densities higher than gaseous or liquid hydrogen that could enable effective solid state hydrogen storage.  There is a DOE hydrogen storage program with stated goals, but according to a presentation by Sunita Satyapal of the DOE, "No [hydrogen] technology meets targets."  Here's a link to a long list of DOE publications on hydrogen research.

This remains complex stuff and heady materials science.  Some of the more promising materials being investigated are complex metal hydrides, including metal alanates, amides, borohydrides and their derivatives.  The DOE wants a reversible 5.5% hydrogen storage system and according to Stavila, "As of now, none of the materials investigated so far satisfy all of the DOE targets."

There is also a time factor involved in getting these materials to absorb and release hydrogen.  Despite significant improvements in the storage capacity, most of the hydride materials still require high temperatures to decompose and release their hydrogen.

Michael Kanellos reported on a virus that makes hydrogen and I covered Sun Catalytix, a VC-funded company looking to inexpensively electrolyze water.

Early-stage startup Pilus Energy makes a microbial fuel cell which produces hydrogen gas and DC electricity from the metabolism of organic materials by genetically engineered bacteria.  Feedstocks for the Pilus bioreactor are organic compounds found in waterways, plant pulps, farm wastes and sewage.  A video illustrating this concept is here.

Venture Capitalists Vie For the Winning Energy Storage Technology

At least five utility-scale storage startups have closed on $65 million in venture capital funding so far in 2010.  Here's a list:

  • Prudent Energy raised $22M for Vanadium redox flow batteries.  
  • General Compression's $17M Round A for near-isothermal CAES to enable "dispatchable wind."  
  • Enervault, still in stealth-mode, raised $3.5M for flow batteries  
  • EnerG2 raised $3.5M to develop nanoscale materials for ultracapacitors for EVs, PHEVs, and for hydrogen storage.  Perspective from EnerG2  
  • Isentropic Energy raised $2.3M for gravel-based thermal energy storage  
  • EnStorage raised $15M in a Round B led by Warburg Pincus for flow batteries

It's Not Just Startups Going After Utility-Scale Energy Storage  

GE Energy Storage Technologies recently unveiled a battery technology for utility companies and is claiming that it will make a $160 million investment in this battery technology, developing new materials, new manufacturing technologies and intelligent controls.  GE claims that the battery has the ability to last up to two decades, while providing optimal charge and discharge times in extreme temperature environments. 

GE claims that the battery is suitable for transmission and distribution upgrade deferral, time shifting, congestion relief, peak shaving, load following, and reserve capacity and will support end-user applications such as time-of-use (TOU) management, demand charge reduction, and power quality improvement. 

GE's battery is a sodium halide battery chemistry obtained through an acquisition of Beta R&D in 2007.  The $160 million investment is being made to start up a factory on the GE Energy campus in Schenectady, NY, with first saleable production scheduled for July 2010.  The initial target markets are for telecom and Uninterruptible Power Supply applications.

GE is also an investor in battery maker A123.

The Cost of Lithium-ion Batteries for Utility-Scale Storage

"Lithium ion is getting to megawatt scale," according to Dan Rastler of the Electric Power Research Institute, citing a 1 megawatt-15 minute Li-ion system.  He adds, "There are as many different Li-ion chemistries as there are California wines."  There are currently early field trials by Altair Nano and A123 using Li-ion at utility scale.

According to Rastler, "We need to get below $300 per kilowatt-hour installed, all in," and the cost of Li-ion ranges from $400 per kilowatt-hour to $1,200 per kilowatt-hour.

Haresh Kamath of EPRI's Technology Innovation Group said, "Storage is a great idea -- except for the cost."  Kamath expects the cost of large-format Lithium-ion (for electric vehicles and utility-scale storage) to drop to $250 per kilowatt-hour.

China's BYD is building utility-scale battery based grid storage from their LiFe batteries. They are deploying 4-megawatt energy storage batteries for ancillary services and energy arbitrage. According to a spokesperson, the battery cost was in the $500 per kilowatt-hour range, which is within striking distance of many experts' competitive target of $250 per kilowatt-hour.

Jonathan Howes, the Chief Technical Officer of U.K. start-up Isentropic Energy, claims his large-scale storage costs are an order of magnitude lower than lithium-ion batteries or other stored energy technologies -- $55 per kilowatt-hour currently, with a path to get down to $8 per kilowatt-hour.

And Finally, a Few Words on Ultracapacitors

Market researchers predict that the ultracapacitor (a.k.a. supercapacitor or double-layer capacitor) market will grow rapidly in the coming years, reaching $500 million by 2011 or 2012.  This growth will likely be driven by the automotive and transportation sector, as well as by applications in renewable energy, consumer electronics and industrial power management.  
 
Compared to lithium-ion batteries, which gradually lose their capability to hold a charge after a few thousand charge/discharge cycles, ultracapacitors can withstand hundreds of thousands of charge/discharge cycles.  What's more, ultracaps work well at temperature extremes that hamper battery performance. 

The quick energy jump from ultracapacitors is suited for peak power applications such as elevators, forklifts, consumer electronics and back-up power applications.  In the longer term, ultracaps might serve as alternatives to battery banks for utility-scale power grid applications -- providing a short-term electricity supply during power outages.

Players in the market for ultracaps are Maxwell, Panasonic, NEC TOKIN, Ioxus, Seiko Instruments, Cooper Bussmann, NESSCAP, Cap-XX, and LS Ultracapacitor.  There are many others vying for this emerging market and lots of R&D by companies big and small.

Of course, if you're discussing ultrcapacitors, the conversation eventually turns to the topic of EEStor, the mysterious ultracapacitor start-up that promises a disruptive leap in performance. 

I asked Maxwell's CEO about EEStor and his comments were diplomatically limited to the following observation:  "I'd be more than happy to compare our data to theirs," but "I haven't seen a prototype."  He added, "My experience with technology is, there are many things that are possible.  The question is -- can you make money, can you make a profit, can you make it work and will anybody buy it?"

Steve Pluvia, a frequent commenter on the GTM comment boards, said, "EEStor is nothing more than a vehicle for a Canadian pump-n-dump, specifically Zenn Motors.  Zenn has a powerful Canadian hype team supported by a crooked bucket shop (Paradigm Capital), paid promoters and degenerate gamblers."   

EEStor has received funding from Kleiner Perkins, although Kleiner may have elected not to participate in their most recent funding round.  Other than that, nothing to report on EEStor except the usual unsubstantiated blog chatter.

Stanford University received $1 million from the ARPA-E program to develop an "all-electron battery," a new class of electrical energy storage devices for electric vehicles. The new battery stores energy by moving electrons rather than ions and uses a novel architecture that has potential for very high energy density.

Penn State University also received $1 million for "a novel energy storage device based on a 3D nanocomposite structure with functional oxides that provide a very high effective capacitance."  

For EEStor, this might represent competition or corroboration or even an IP challenge.

Here's a link to a report on ultracapacitor technology and applications from GTM Research.

16 Comments

  • Garth 05/3/10 2:54 PM

    It’s going to take numerous Storage types to create a functional grid each type has a place and does a specified job. starting with grid sized storage like pumped Hydro to utilize the renewables projected to come on line in the next few years.That being said, the storage types can complement each other. On a large scale Pumped Hydro can send to load Regions a Less Lumpy product gleaned from night produced wind. thus allowing time shifted energy with the variability Removed making it easier for utilities to incorporate it,  less wear and tear on grid elements less congestion, little or no curtailment and transmission and delivery is much better.

    Reply
  • Michael 05/3/10 4:04 PM

    This is also worth mentioning: EnStorage raises $15M Series B financing led by Warburg Pincus. Israeli fuel cell start-up EnStorage Ltd. has raised $15 million in a Series B financing round. U.S. private equity fund Warburg Pincus led the round, and was joined by all of EnStorage’s current investors, including Greylock Partners, Canaan Partners, Siemens TTB, and Wellington Partners, according to a report in “Globes”.
    EnStorage was founded in 2007 by VP R&D Dr. Arnon Blum, Chief Scientific Officer Prof. Emanuel Peled of Tel Aviv University, Chairman Nachman Shelef, and former CEO Eran Yarkoni. EnStorage is developing and commercializing energy storage systems, based on technology developed for over by Prof. Emanuel Peled and his team at Tel Aviv University. The technology is licensed from Ramot, the technology transfer company of Tel Aviv University.
    http://cleantech-israel.blogspot.com/2010/04/enstorage-raises-15m-series-b-financing.html

    Reply
  • Eric Wesoff 05/3/10 4:35 PM

    Thanks Michael - I will update the article.  I’ve spoken to Mr. Shelef of EnStorage in the past.

    Reply
  • Rover1401 05/3/10 6:30 PM

    Eric, To start the article off with the line “Readers of this site and energy aficionados everywhere recognize that variable sources like wind and solar power require firming to make them truly dispatchable” pays no attention to the economics or actual way of integrating variable generation or loads for that matter.  I would urge you to read the new NREL report on the role of energy storage with renewable integration. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy10osti/47187.pdf  Think about loads for a moment. The daily load curve is similar to wind generation (changes on hour-time frame with large ramps) and the solar variability is just like regulation AGC signal (fast, short ramps in either direction).  If we use predictive models for forecasting & ancillary services to manage variable load, we will be able to manage variable generation with an increased amount of ancillary services and better forecasting. Making new generation look like thermal generation makes people feel more comfortable but it is not the right way of looking at how to integrate renewables. It adds unnecessary costs to the system.  Any mandate for a certain percentage of energy storage in a portfolio is a complete waste of taxpayer dollars.  Develop mechanisms to properly price the balancing services required to integrate renewables and I promise to bring storage to your market.
    - B.

    Reply
  • Eric Wesoff 05/3/10 7:58 PM

    Rover1401,
    Thanks for your email and the NREL link.  I’ve checked on what you said with some smart folks and you’re mostly right and maybe a little wrong.  And I am simplifying things by saying we should look to make renewables dispatchable.  My erudite source says, “...we should not attempt to make variable resources dispatchable, but rather use the markets for ancillary services and energy to balance variable resources and variable load with generation and storage.  However, the markets for energy and ancillary services have been designed for fossil units and not fast responding storage so they undervalue storage.  Fixing these markets takes time.  And storage is best located close to the load where it also substitutes for new transmission and distribution and provides local reliability. Fixing the planning process to fairly value local storage vs. transmission and distribution investment is hard and will take a long time.  A storage portfolio standard in California cuts through these market problems until they can be fixed.”  So, agreed on the dispatchable part and I will change my wording—but not so agreed on “the mandate for a certain percentage of energy storage in a portfolio is a complete waste of taxpayer dollars.”

    Reply
      • WOV 06/1/11 2:21 PM

        You, too are mostly right a little wrong here - meaning we’re asymptotically equilibrating towards Truth!  N

        “Fixing these markets takes time.” - Eh. I submit that “changing rules” is quicker than “inventing stuff” even in a highly bureaucratic environment.  (But!  creating a portfolio standard is a way to get slower-not-faster rulemakings.  Tradable credits, M&V, eligibliity, rafts of rulings, yadda yadda.  You’re not cutting through process, you’re the old lady who swallowed a fly.

        Take a look at PJM; they’ll happily make a fundamental market rule change in 24 months - and planning per se is taking a smaller and smaller role in any ISO’s role - maybe they’ll have to adapt the forecasting of consumer behavior they currently do to model gen, storage AND load - tricky but not impossible.

  • bob Freeston 05/3/10 9:47 PM

    Fly wheel storage provides both dispatch and grid regulation.  It can be sited anywhere needed. See Beacon’s 20 MW project in Spencertown, N Y They power up at night and dispatch at peak.

    Reply
  • glenn2ns 05/3/10 10:07 PM

    Eric, you mention nuclear. . .I don’t know how state-of-the-art the oil rig that just caught fire, fell over and caused perhaps the nation’s greatest environmental catastrophe was, but it seem likely that some collateral damage might well fall to the nuclear industry.  I’d be interested to see a write up on it.

    On a separate subject, it seems that one of the problems with the hydrogen economy is that the combustion is so poor with conventional means.  Improving the efficiency of the reaction produces a great deal more power - making the prospect of it far more appealing.  Certainly, in the controlled environment of storage, this is easy to accomplish.  I think the Bloom folks are working on the idea I am talking about.

    Reply
  • Stefan 05/4/10 12:48 PM

    Eric, the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), which you’ve mentioned in the article, is currently working on an open source project to create public requirements for electricity storage in renewable energy and smart grid applications.

    The major application areas include Substation Grid Support, Distributed Energy Storage Systems, Wind Storage, and Photovoltaic Storage.

    This is a public project, so anyone can participate. More info is available at http://www.ttcorp.com/epri/

    Reply
  • bob Freeston 05/4/10 8:41 PM

    To Glenn2ns—re hydrogen—Fuel Cell Energy I think has better tech than Bloom—their molten carbonate fuel cell does both elec & heat achieving 75% effic. It also consumes some co2.  Cogen of all types needs more attention, its much more common in Europe.

    Reply
  • Tunguska 05/5/10 4:27 AM

    Thank you for this excellent summary!

    Metal hydrides for reversible hydrogen storage is about to be marketed by the company McPhy, they just commissioned their first manufacturing line this April.

    Reply
  • Paul UK 05/9/10 1:57 PM

    BTW re my last post, Prof Garvey in the video gives a cost which suggests it is expensive, however when I emailed him, he pointed out the cost of storage would be about £2 per MWh.

    In the video he gives a total cost price for a bag, but quotes the energy storage capacity for a single ‘recharge’ cycle of a bag.

    Reply
  • Glenn Doty 06/1/11 8:24 AM

    Sorry I missed this article. 

    Thank you for the mention, Eric.  It’s nice to see that at least some journalists are looking beyond the solutions that were first discussed when the DOE was founded.  We still believe we will be the only economically viable integration solution for wind - as regions with high wind penetration see a rapid drop in the price of peak energy, so any system that derives profit from price arbitrage would have considerable difficulties as more wind penetrates into the grid.

    Liquid fuels, on the other hand, have a global market that is completely indifferent to local saturation, so WindFuels would always be able to profit from stabilizing the grid for high penetrations of renewable energy.

    Reply
  • Garth 06/1/11 10:51 AM

    Glenn, I respectably disagree with you; all forms of storage will be needed for the numerous applications; from pumped hydro to integrate wind on a bulk grid storage level to batteries for neighborhood distributed solar parity. Liquid fuels are needed as well and have a bit different place but just as important in the energy industry.Your competition will be liquified natural gas after storage removes the need for gas peakers to provide spinning reserve and ramping.

    Reply
Need an avatar? Get one here: Gravatar