SAN FRANCISCO -- Smart Grid is the energy theme of the moment – hundreds of millions of government funding, billion dollar smart meter deployments, and hundreds of millions in venture capital have drawn the attention of entrepreneurs, utilities, and corporate behemoths like Cisco, Intel, Oracle, ABB and Silver Spring.
And almost 500 of these smart grid cognoscenti converged at the PG&E Auditorium in San Francisco to assess the state of this nascent many-faceted industry at Greentech Media's The Networked Grid event.
Rick Thompson, GTM's fearless smart grid leader, kicked off the event with a review of some recent industry polling. Here a few tidbits:
David J. Leeds, GTM's smart grid analyst, introduced the Real World Deployments and Policies: 2010 to 2020 panel. What follows are some of the more interesting quotes from the speakers.
Thomas Bialek, Chief Engineer, Smart Grid SDG&E:
Erfan Ibrahim, EPRI:
Andrew Campbell, Senior Energy Advisor, CPUC:
Kevin Dasso, Senior Director, Smart Grid Strategy at PG&E:
Smart grid has been the buzzword on utility, entrepreneur and investor's lips in 2009.
Funding the smart grid has certainly been on the Obama administration's agenda – as evidenced by the billions being funneled into this sector (see Jeff St. John's pieces about the winners and losers in this contest).
Venture Capital investors have been talking about smart grid investments for a while now. Foundation Capital's Steve Vassallo even authored a "Smart Grid Manifesto" to "help drive a single point of view across our four Smart Grid portfolio companies." Vassallo writes, "Smart Grid and smart pricing together answer the riddle of how you get market forces to make a difference in a monopoly environment."
Foundation's smart grid investments include EnerNoc, Silver Spring Networks, eMeter and Control4.
Another theme amongst VC investors in 2009 has been the capital efficiency of smart grid plays. In other words: Don't expect too many Solyndra or Nanosolar-magnitude deals from the VC community in 2009 or 2010.
That said, in looking at the numbers, although funding in smart grid is recovering:
It's a bit surprising to see the small proportion of smart grid deals relative to VC in greentech as a whole:
So are VCs talking and not diving in? Are they looking to see the outcome of Silver Spring Networks' utility roll-out? Are we only in early days?
Or will these initial forays into Advanced Meter Infrastructure and Home Energy Networks give way to a bigger and steadier wave of other smart grid technologies like Vehicle to Grid, EV charging stations, data management and analytics, network optimization tools, and independent energy storage operators?
The next few quarters will tell. Smart people in Greentech Media's smart grid practice see a new smart grid innovation and investment wave about to break.
How can you be against the smart grid? Or against smart meters?
Isn't it like being anti-motherhood or anti-apple pie or anti-education? Apparently not, according to a recent citizen uprising in Fresno. And a recent smart grid panel I moderated.
First the panel. I moderated a relatively contentious panel at the Netherlands America Foundation on Thursday night. Execs from smart grid hardware and software startups including:
All chimed in with the warning that:
Even a panelist from the SF PUC was dubious of the value of the smart meters. As for the firms themselves, APT has been profitably integrating smart energy systems in the enterprise for 15 years – deploying smart energy before the term was invented. iDo and HAE are start-ups looking to add intelligence to the building or home energy system but not at the meter.
On to the citizen uprising...

Excerpts from an October 22 article in The Fresno Bee:
More than 100 people packed a town hall meeting in downtown Fresno to vent their frustration with PG&E's newest metering technology – SmartMeters – that customers say has led to faulty spikes in utility bills. "The meters, in my opinion, are not very smart," PG&E customer Joe Riojas told Senate Majority Leader Dean Florez, D-Shafter. The meeting lasted four-and-a-half hours. No one spoke in favor of the Smart Meters.
Many customers brought their PG&E bills to show Florez their skyrocketing costs. For example, Don Vercellini of Fresno said his bill recently went from $500 a month to $1,173. "It's straight-out fraud. I want my money back," he said.
Florez complained that the technology for customers to check usage will not be in place for years.
Said Florez: "People don't see the value [in this program]. They just see higher cost, and that makes them angry."
You wouldn't like Fresno when it's angry.
Jeff St. John blogged about it here. According to St. John's reporting: Those complaints have focused attention on PG&E's $2.2 billion, 10 million smart meter deployment, with the California Public Utilities Commission demanding that PG&E find a third party to investigate.
But PG&E has already tested many customers' smart meters – made by General Electric and Landis+Gyr and networked by Silver Spring Networks – and have not found any problems with how they're working, according to PG&E spokesman Denny Boyles.
Rather than malfunctioning meters, PG&E thinks the higher bills have come from its two rate hikes in the past 12 months, plus a hot summer that led to many Central Valley residents cranking their air conditioners to beat the heat, Boyles said.
With the feds ready to launch another wave of smart grid funding – it would be helpful for the public to actually want these products and services. And to actually feel some immediate benefit and value from the smart grid.
It can't be just about benefits for the utilities.
Imagine an affluent Massachusetts suburb where EVs really take off, say to 10 percent of the neighborhood homes in a short while. Then, figure that when the owners come home from work at 6:30 p.m. and plug in their cars to recharge they're pulling 3.5 kilowatts from the grid, which is as much or more than their entire house. So now, the house has been lit up, the car is in the garage recharging, and the big screen and some appliances for dinner are also going. And then it's just a matter time before you begin to hear the sound of transformers popping, and the lights go out.
At a Ford Motor Company media day here in Boston this week, the cars – a Ford Focus with a Magna electric drivetrain, a plug-in Hybrid Escape and a 2010 Taurus with THX surround sound – were the big draw. Alongside Ford was National Grid, discussing its vision for a smart grid. For now it means working on standards together, and integrating current smart-metering efforts and business models with the EV industry, so that the impact of the EV isn't overlooked in utility smart grid plans. In the future, assuming EVs take off, things will get more interesting for the power company. Nancy Gioia, director of Ford global electrification, and Stan Blazewicz, global head of technology for National Grid, discussed how the integration of EV charging and smart grid does more than keep transformers from overheating, but is part of a whole new paradigm of utility-controlled load-shifting, renewable energy integration, and distributed energy storage.
This is far easier said than done. The pitch is that EVs will use off-peak power from a utility, thereby taking advantage of lower pricing during these periods of low load. On its surface that feels true, and there are a few studies that claim no new generating capacity will be needed for the first years of EV penetration because of off-peak charging. However, a closer inspection of this idea raises a few questions:
1. At 6 p.m., when many drivers will arrive home and plug in to recharge, utilities are operating in a well-documented second peak of daily demand. Without some kind of intelligent management, this additional load can create havoc in areas with many EVs. It also cuts against the notion that EVs will have little impact on the grid because they will mainly charge during off-peak times.
2. How long will off-peak actually stay off-peak? With increased penetration of EVs, the increased load during off-peak times will inevitably lead to higher pricing and the eventual diminishment of what is now a predictable off-peak timeframe.
3. Stress on the grid. Many of today's utilities with aging networks count on the cool nights to keep their neighborhood transformers from overheating, allowing them a good 10 hours to cool down each evening. With EVs pulling such extreme loads at night, these transformers won't last and will need replacing, increasing the cost to utilities and complicating the economics of smart grid and utility-vehicle integration.
From there we went outside to test drive the cars. I drove the Ford Escape PHEV, one of National Grid's, with Steven Tobias, principal analyst for technology and innovation at National Grid. Even compared to my Prius it was incredibly quiet. There was no annoying beeping on backup and no sound at all while driving out of the lot into South Boston. It did have a great deal of information from the dash about power usage, charging status, etc. "When does the gas engine kick in?" I asked. "When it needs to go over 40, or when you floor it," said Steven. So I floored it. Sure enough, combustion, and a real pleasing kick, threw our heads back into the seats as the tachometer came to life and showed 2000 rpm. It gave us a good ride around the neighborhood, and a sense that this SUV had some life and consumer appeal.
The question is whether the grid is ready for it.







VC in Storage
With A123's recent and relatively successful IPO fresh in investor and entrepreneurial memories – it looks like batteries and energy storage are going to continue to be a hot sector.
VCs invested more than $114 million in the third quarter in 11 energy storage in their ongoing quest for the energy storage grail. Investments were in technologies ranging from fuel cells to lithium-ion batteries to compressed air to flywheels to EEStor's supercapacitors.
|
Q3 VC Investment in Batteries, Fuel Cells and Energy Storage |
|||
|
Intelligent Energy (UK) |
$30M |
Meditor European Master Fund, F&C Investors, et al. |
Fuel cell and hydrogen generation technologies |
|
Powercell (Sweden) |
$27M |
Volvo Technology, Midroc, OCAS |
PEM fuel cells |
|
ClearEdge Power |
$15M Round E |
Applied Ventures, Big Basin Ventures, Kohlberg family, et al. |
Fuel cell-based CHP powered by propane or natural gas |
|
Solicore |
$13.3M Round D |
Rogers Corp, DFJ, Rho Ventures, Braemar Energy Ventures, OPG Ventures, Firelake |
Thin, flexible lithium polymer batteries |
|
Seeo |
$8M |
Khosla Ventures, et al. |
Rechargeable li-ion batteries based on solid polymer electrolyte technology licensed from LBNL |
|
CFX Battery |
$5M of a $27M Round B |
CMEA Ventures, Harris & Harris, USVP |
Primary and rechargeable lithium ion batteries |
|
EEStor |
$5M |
Zenn Motor Compnay |
Ultracapacitors with mythical performance |
|
Blue Spark Technologies |
First close of $5M Round B |
Early Stage Partners, SunBridge Partners, et al. |
Thin, flexible, printed industrial batteries |
|
SustainX |
$4M |
Polaris Venture Partners, RockPort, NSF, Angeli Parvi |
Compressed-air storage systems |
|
Pentadyne Power |
$2M Debt |
Undisclosed |
Flywheeel energy storage |
|
Pragma (France) |
$600K |
Finaqui, Oséo Capital, et al |
PEM hydrogen fuel cells |
Speedbumps for Energy Storage
Energy storage applications vary widely in their requirements. Portable, electric vehicles and utility-scale storage all have their own needs for power density, energy density, and cycling characteristics and no single technology or materials system is going to meet all needs.
Energy Storage VC and entrepreneurs still have a few speedbumps in their path to the grail:
Capital intensive operations like A123 which have taken hundreds of millions of funding over many years, even after a decent IPO, do not seem to have the traditional home-run multiples that VCs have bench marked in the past. The days of 10X returns, at least for massive factory-driven companies like A123, or Solyndra, or Nanosolar, or Tesla for that matter, might be over.
Energy storage is fundamentally a materials play and the laws of physics tend to be stubborn. It's difficult to wring 2X or 3X performance out of existing and mature materials systems. EEStor is making bold claims of this nature and it will be disruptive if they prove out - but for now we wait and see. Raj Atluru, a partner at DFJ, has long claimed that in batteries – a 1.3X improvement in performance is worth investigating. None of the expectations of 10X performance at a tenth the price that are de rigueur in IT deals.
And utilities and energy regulators like the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) still haven't gotten their collective minds around how storage fits into the grid. Ed Cazalet of Megawatt Storage Farms, a start-up that aspires to be an Independent Storage Operator, knows this all too well. Merchant storage – owned by the customer or independent parties is a "substantial regulatory challenge," according to Cazalet. Is it transmission? Generation? Distribution?
Like transmission, storage moves energy from one place to another with some losses. Is energy storage a transmission asset? Storage competes with generation. Is is a generation asset? Is it a distribution asset? Or is it a fourth category?
The problem is, according to Cazalet, "If a utility doesn't know whether to call it transmission, distribution, or generation – they're not going to use it." And that debate is going on right now in the California PUC and at the FERC.
Those are some of the challenges faced by storage – market, technological and regulatory.
Storage and The Grid
Most explorations of the smart grid look at smart meters or home area networks. But the smart grid extends into better utilization of renewables and that means both intelligence and energy storage – as well as incorporating Electric Vehicles into the intelligent grid. Our Networked Grid event in San Francisco on November 4 will cover AMI, HANs and the potential of energy storage in integrating renewables into the smart grid.
GTM Research has a new report on Grid Scale Energy Storage available here.
And download our free report on the Smart Grid here.
Aneesh Chopra is the Chief Technology Officer and Associate Director for Technology in the White House Office of Science and Technology. He was sworn in on May 22, 2009 and is the nation's first CTO. He spoke to several hundred Silicon Valley folks at a TiE event early last Saturday morning. I repeat, early Saturday morning.
Mr. Chopra listed the technology areas that he and the Obama administration want to address:
Health IT: One of Chopra's "passions." He wants to "catalyze product innovation through open data standards, deliver administrative simplification, and align research and health IT."
Education Technology: He wants to ensure "continuity of learning." What happens if schools close due to, say, a flu? How do we enable nimble, easy to roll out, continuity of learning mechanisms?
And lastly and most germane to Greentech Media readers, he wants to accelerate the smart grid and energy efficiency through product innovation enabled by open standards. His office is "extraordinarily concerned about cybersecurity in the grid." and is championing open standards. According to Chopra, "FERC claims we can lower energy consumption with demand reponse by 20 percent."
After his keynote, Chopra sat on a panel along with Scott Lang, the CEO of Smart Grid poster child, Silver Springs Networks. Silver Spring has raised about $175 million in Venture Capital from investors such as Foundation Capital and KP. KP's special partner, Al Gore, is chairman of SSN's advisory board. Lang commented on how his customers, the utilities, are some of the most risk-adverse entities on the planet yet they are now working with SSN and networking about 10,000 homes a day with smart meters. Lang claimed that energy efficiency and demand response can lower our need for new generation by 50 percent.
Silver Springs recently purchased Greenbox for a rumored $20 million in an all stock deal. Greenbox had recently been looking for funding. And while we're promulgating rumors, SSN is talking about a company valuation of, sit down, $1.5 billion.
Finishing off this event was Silicon Valley icon, Steve Wozniak, looking relatively trim and upbeat despite being replaced by "The Hammer" on Dancing with the Stars. The Woz meandered enthusiastically about education and his recent stint as a teacher. He received about as much applause as the CTO of the U.S.

Erfan Ibrahim of EPRI gave a wide ranging talk on Tuesday evening entitled "EPRI's Smart Grid Vision and AMI/HAN Research Overview." It was an Industry Outreach Event held at EPRI's bucolic Palo Alto campus. The talk touched upon Noam Chomsky, the effect of high magnetic fields on the menstruation cycles of cattle (long story), and the long-term energy portfolio of the United States. Mostly the latter.
EPRI is the Electric Power Resource Institute – a non-profit tax-exempt organization funded by utilities and founded in 1972 after the electric blackouts of the 1960s. EPRI has more than 700 employees, a budget in excess of $300 million and instigates more than 1,600 R&D projects annually. EPRI also engages in relatively high-risk technology innovation and research ranging from new energy storage technologies and new battery chemistries – all the way to cold fusion.
EPRI has four divisions:
Long View
Ibrahim set the stage saying: "As we gaze over the grazing animals and the rolling hills of Palo Alto - we think in the long term." How do we deal with coal? It's not going away. How to we lengthen the life of nuclear power plants?
According to Ibrahim, the solution is not wind mills. Nor is it solar. (Adequate transmission lines being just one of the obstacles)
Aim of the Smart Grid
"Our aim is to begin a very serious dialogue on how the smart grid will lead us to a low-carbon environment as a society," he said. Ibrahim emphasized that EPRI is not made up of idealogues, that "there is no panacea" to curb greenhouse gas emissions and that it is going to take a combination of many technologies to decarbonize the electric industry.
The smart grid is just one piece of the puzzle.
"It's not that the grid is dumb – it's that we haven't found a way to network all of these nodes," he said. There already is a relatively smart grid that functions at an almost 100 percent efficiency rate, according to Ibrahim. Siemens, ABB, etc. have been embedding intelligence into the grid for years.
"We have to intelligently embed networks to create a distributed intelligent network," said Ibrahim. How do we create this distributed intelligent network? EPRI is looking for a movement with realistic expectations. Not just an IP platform.
EPRI's Prism Study (downloadable here) is a carbon cap strategy that limns out the best way to transition to low emissions technology.
And that includes:
Nuclear and CCS
It's not that EPRI isn't a fan of of solar – Ibrahim acknowledged it's contribution but doesn't see it playing a large role in our energy mix. In fact, in large-scale, EPRI found that solar actually increased the price of electricity (I'll assume that's due to the necessity of having back up generation or expensive storage to cover solar's flaws.)
EPRI certainly sees nuclear, now about 20 percent of the U.S. energy mix as a necessity. Specifically, third-generation nukes – "passively safe type reactors."
And if you check the prism chart, EPRI also sees CCS (Carbon Capture and Sequestration) as a necessary part of the U.S. energy picture. In fact, Erfan described coal with CCS
as a "disruptive technology" that will "revolutionize the industry."
EPRI's worldview is a glimpse into the utility mindset and must be considered as the likely trajectory our electric generators will follow.

The GTM Research blog provides brief and frequent market analysis provided by the GTM Research team of analysts. It covers everything from analyst perspectives on greentech market events, insights into existing and future research, posts based on select analyst briefings and vendor meetings, and insights from conferences and other industry events.