• Friday, November 20, 2009 Latest Update: 4:41PM
Eric Wesoff | October 24, 2009 at 4:34 PM 7 Comments

Zenn and Them Old EEStor Blues

The EEStor music catalog continues to expand.

This summer's EEStor tribute folk song from James Schultz, Quaker songwriter, was a Guthrie-esque ode to EEStor's Dick Weir and Zenn's Ian Clifford and their saga of permittivity and barium titanate purity.  Schultz has released a bluesy new hit single entitled "The EEStor Blues" in which he sings (sort of sings) of being  "tired of the old NDA, no new net news blues," and laments the demise of the City Zenn. He once again manages to get barium titanate into the rhyme scheme, unique in the history of song.

In September, Zenn Motors Chief Executive Ian Clifford told Reuters that the company discontinued its plans to sell its own highway-speed EV. Instead, Zenn is betting on EEStor, the secretive startup claiming a radical advance in ultracapacitors, that will allow EVs to charge faster and go 250 miles on a single charge at low cost. Zenn abandoned its car manufacturing business to focus on the EEStor alchemy and a drivetrain built for other auto vendors. 

EV maven Darryl Siry and former blogger on these pages writes in Wired:

"This change in strategy represents a moment of clarity for Zenn – recognition that the entire value of the company lies with its speculative bet on EEStor’s game changing technology claims, and not with the expected value of its now abandoned car business.  Which means that if you attribute today’s $169 million market capitalization of Zenn Motor Cars entirely to its 10.7% stake in EEStor, the secretive and mercurial startup can announce another questionable milestone: an implied value of more than $1.5 billion."

In the words of EEStor skeptic, frequent commenter and fabled gadfly, Steve Pluvia, "EEStor is nothing more than a vehicle for a Canadian pump-n-dump, specifically Zenn Motors. Zenn has a powerful Canadian hype team supported by a crooked bucket shop (Paradigm Capital), paid promoters and degenerate gamblers. Experts in the field of EEStor’s technology do not believe the claims in their product... The trade here is to short Zenn on all pops from here forward."

Investor Vinod Khosla is also skeptical of the company and it appears as if early investor Kleiner Perkins chose not to re-up on their investment when Zenn raised their ownership stake.

In the truthy column, apparently UL has received a request to test the mythic EESU and a firm called Polarity has received a contract from EEStor to integrate Polarity’s high power HV to LV converter into EEStor's EESU.

If EEStor is real and its technology is a game changer that disrupts the world of automotive transportation – then Zenn, Weir, KP, Paradigm, Ed B. are brilliant technologists, investors and futurists.  If EEStor is a scam, we get an illustrative story of technical disingenuousness and a naive public and investor team.

And we get a few good songs. Thanks Brother Schultz.

Comments [7]

  • Rumplestiltskin 10/24/09 5:23 PM

    If I were developing this product I would handle it exactly the way Eestor is handling it. Too many brilliant ideas have been stolen by competitors over the years. I believe this product is for real and that Eestor is taking all the proper steps to see that they cash in on the idea.

    Reply
      • stevepluvia 10/25/09 10:32 AM

        Interesting… So, you wouldn’t build a working prototype to access unlimited amounts of cheap development money.  Instead, you’d license to a bankrupt Canadian golf cart manufacturer who has to raise money via a boiler room operation that specializes in pump-n-dumps?

  • Dick Weirdo 10/24/09 6:02 PM

    Is Zenn committing Fraud?

    http://www.gm-volt.com/forum/showthread.php?p=31023#post31023

    Reply
      • alan 10/25/09 8:44 PM

        Just because all those other so-called experts were’nt smart enough to think of it first doesn’t mean Eastors idea isn’t real. This criticism happens everytime a revolutiionary idea comes out. I am very hopefull for Eestor to prove everyone else wrong. Because obviously the all-electric car is never going to be a viable option until something much much better than the current technology offers.

  • creativforce 10/26/09 9:22 AM

    Every year that EEStor spends in development is worth billions to Big Oil.  Does it surprise anyone that a Texas company would be delaying such a disruptive product?

    Reply
  • antiguajohn 10/27/09 2:59 PM

    All new start up’s have early days teething problems.

    The situation with EEStor reminds me of Nanosolar, they took almost 5 years to get to market, a cheif scientist left, pundits disparaged their product, “it will never work they said” and now it’s a contender to become the market leader, their biggest problem is building capacity fast enough.

    It’s like deja vous all over again.

    If EEStor has the goods, they have to be very careful, energy is a 6 trillion dollar a year business and if you think big tobacco put a dirty fight or the health care industry is putting undue disinformation and political pressure including dis-information, well just wait till the oil and automotive industry start to realize the impact of a successful EESU.

    Consumers are not stupid when it comes to saving money, they will quickly realize the cost of solar and EEStor units for house and electric cars (or their old car converted to electric)  will be able to be paid off in 3 to 6 years and then from there on it’s no need to pay to run your house or car.

    Think solar is too expensive?

    Consider that First Solar said in 3 to 5 years they expect solar cells to be 42 to 61 cents per watt!

    If EEStor works and you are in the fossil fuel business, be afraid, be very afraid.

    antiguajohn

    Reply
  • C. Dumurgeon 10/28/09 2:48 PM

    At the end of the day, assuming as we must, that it was all “smoke and mirrors”, wouldn’t there be serious penalties, jail terms perhaps, for some of the perpetrators?  Granted the Weir brothers (one feels compelled to add that missing ‘d’ whenever writing that (:>)  are not selling anything to the public.  Theirs is a contractual agreement with private investors, so they’re probably “maximally teflon coated” against any repercussions.  But what of Ian Clifford?  ZENN does sell shares to the public.  Initially they claimed steadfastly to be nothing more than an electric car company: granted with a possible interest in that “Texas startup” .  But after the leaked phone call, and heady declarations a la “we’re privy to EESTOR inside information that no one else has access too”  and now the final straw, ZENN lives or dies by EESTOR’s success, it’s hard to see how Ian Clifford could avoid very real legal consequences.  But then I’m no lawyer!  Perhaps someone more enlightened in these matters could give us an opinion?

    Reply

Green Light

Greentech Media's Green Light blog covers the full-scope of the greentech world, while expanding the range of our daily news reporting with brief and insightful blog posts from our Greentech Media editors, GTM Research analysts and numerous guest bloggers.

.