• Friday, November 20, 2009 Latest Update: 4:41PM
Eric Wesoff | May 5, 2009 at 7:00 AM 2 Comments

VC Doesn’t Scale

VC Investment in Greentech 2005–2009

There are a lot of voices of late sounding the death knell for venture capital. The New York Times dusts this meme off every few years. One just has to have a good memory and ignore the nattering nabobs of negativity. They’re usually wrong.

Fred Wilson of Union Square Ventures has a different take. Wilson has crunched some numbers and claims that “VC doesn’t scale.”  He has determined that: “You cannot invest $25 billion per year and generate the kinds of returns investors seek from the asset class,” and that, “The number that the asset class can take on each year is around $15 billion to $17 billion. It's interesting to note that the industry raised $4.3 billion in the first quarter of 2009. That's a good thing. If we can keep it to that level, or less for a while, then we may be able to downsize and get returns back on track.”

Fred is right.

There has also been a sky is falling mentality in the greentech investment sector.  The bubble has burst, project finance money is gone forever, the end is nigh, etc.  These folks are wrong as well. 

Unsurprisingly, first quarter greentech investing was down. That makes sense if you’ve been paying attention to current events. But second quarter investment in greentech is already showing signs of a rebound and has gotten off to a roaring start with about $500 million in greentech VC invested in April alone.

Renewable energy, green and cleantech, ecologically sustainable technology and investment is at the beginning of a 20-year boom and there are going to be ups and downs along the way. Get used to it.

 

 

Comments [2]

  • Peter A 05/5/09 12:48 PM

    As a VC, Fred Wilson looks at things from his perspective. As a non-VC with no vested interest in greentech right now (this may change sometime in the future), I can see things objectively, unemotionally and from several thousand feet up. So here’s my take for whatever it’s worth:

    Venture capital has NEVER succeeded in disrupting substantial entrenched interests. It has only succeeded in creating NEW industries around NEW technologies that faced NO immediate competition at the time (or at least they were not perceived as threatening).

    In order for green tech to succeed, it MUST disrupt hydrocarbons. But you can’t have disruption in a free market if your technology is neither good enough nor cheaper than the competition, which is why government has to be involved. And the moment government takes charge, VC takes the passenger seat, if that.

    Reply
  • bg 05/12/09 3:55 PM

    I have no illusions that VC is the be all, end all, but…

    “Venture capital has NEVER succeeded in disrupting substantial entrenched interests.”

    Ever heard of Google? (Microsoft was a pretty substantial entrenched interest).

    Reply

Green Light

Greentech Media's Green Light blog covers the full-scope of the greentech world, while expanding the range of our daily news reporting with brief and insightful blog posts from our Greentech Media editors, GTM Research analysts and numerous guest bloggers.

.