• Friday, November 20, 2009 Latest Update: 4:41PM
Michael Kanellos | March 7, 2009 at 4:11 PM 3 Comments

Utility to Try Backyard Energy Storage

American Electric Power later this year will put electrical storage units in the backyard of some customers that will be used during to provide power to local homes.

The units will be capable of providing power to about four to six homes, according to Ali Nourai, who manages distributed energy sources, for AEP at the MIT Energy Conference, reports Martin LaMonica at CNET. The power could be used during regular hours or during the peak periods in the afternoon. AEP has a lot of customers in the Midwest and South, where air conditioners on hot days increase the odds of brown and blackouts. Some traditional gas peaker plants are only used 15 or so days a year—storage could essentially eliminate the need to run these things.

“Aggregated, hundreds of these units controlled (by AEP) ... effectively do the same as one big storage unit,” Nourai said. “It’s closer to the load, and it has the potential to [create] competition on price.”

Energy storage is the latest obsession of the day among VCs, investors, entrepreneurs and utilities. Storage can make wind and solar more economical and at the same time more grid-friendly by making it possible to sell and/or deliver the power harvested by the environment at any time of the day.

Unfortunately, nothing has gone big time yet. Technological hurdles need to be crossed and the cost on some of these items remains high. Some of the leading ideas: flow batteries, compressed air storage, industrial sized hydrogen fuel cells, methanol fuel cells, solid oxide fuel cells, pumped hydro, sodium batteries. That is for persistent energy storage. For temporary storage for balancing the grid, check out ultracapacitors, flywheels and lithium-ion batteries.

AEP has been experimenting with sodium batteries for power storage for the past few years at some sites. Sodium batteries, however, are more appropriate at utility controlled sites. They only operate well at 285 Celsius and higher. It isn’t clear what AEP will use in the backyard trials.

Also at the conference, Lars Josefsson from Vattenfall, Sweden’s mongo-sized utility, discussed carbon reduction plans.

Comments [3]

  • Peter Antypas 03/8/09 8:53 AM

    Finally!!! Someone figured out that storage needs to be distributed. This is definitely a step in the right direction.

    Reply
  • Robert Steinhaus 03/8/09 10:29 AM

    Backup Solar and Wind Power with Thorium Molten Salt Reactors

    Renewable energy systems require a double energy infrastructure investment. It is first necessary to purchase the relatively expensive solar panels, solar thermal generators, or windmills. You must then backup these renewable energy plants with full capacity backups capable of providing power to the grid during the times the sun does not shine or the wind does not blow. You could use high carbon footprint technologies like coal, oil, or natural gas as backups to renewables if you want. It is also possible to consider less waste generating Thorium nuclear power plants to provide capacity backup to your renewables during the times of the day renewables are providing only small amounts of power into the power grid. Thorium Molten Salt Reactors produce less than 1 part in 100 the amount of total high level toxic waste of conventional nuclear LWR reactors and generate large amounts of energy economically with very high energy availability while producing no greenhouse gases. Thorium Molten Salt Reactors, unlike conventional nuclear reactors, can quickly and safely adjust their power output and can if necessary change their power output multiple times a day in response to changing load conditions and changing availability of energy from renewable sources.  It makes some sense to consider zero Green House Gas producing Thorium Molten Salt Reactors as a backup to renewable energy during the times renewable sources are unable to produce power.

    Nuclear energy development for commercial power generation has evolved over the past two decades. Our best current nuclear power designs are capable of operating in a very safe fashion without generating large amounts of long term high activity waste and have greatly improved fuel efficiency. Most of what constitutes “nuclear waste” from our current Light Water Reactors is unburned fuel. Light Water Reactors currently used to make electricity in the USA only burn 2 to 3 percent of their Uranium/Plutonium fuel. The majority of the fuel in the spent fuel rod is just wasted and thrown away at great expense into the Yucca Mountain repository where it sits for 25,000 years as a worrisome contaminant. Thorium Molten Salt Reactors burn in excess of 98% of their fuel and produce more manageable fission products as waste. All of the fission products from Thorium Molten Salt Reactors decay to benign levels of radioactivity in less than 300 years. The majority (83%) of the fission products produced by TMSR reactors decay to the level of the natural radioactive background in 10 years.

    Using Thorium Molten Salt Reactors as backup systems to your renewable energy systems will greatly improve the satisfaction of Americans with the completed energy system. People will not be happy with an energy system that has greater brownouts, blackouts, or intermittency than the fossil fuel based power system they are used to. Backing-up with Thorium Nuclear will keep the quality and customer satisfaction with the overall completed energy system high.

    Thorium Molten Salt Reactors are not “crank” science.  Dr. Edward Teller, the founding director of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, wrote his final paper a month before his death on the subject of the advantages of Thorium Molten Salt Reactors and the contribution this style of less polluting nuclear energy could provide in solving the problem of achieving energy independence while reducing the need to generate green house gases. This paper can be downloaded from the following URL:

    http://www.geocities.com/rmoir2003/moir_teller.pdf


    Respectfully,  Robert Steinhaus – Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Retired)

    Note: For a cost of approximately one tenth the projected 2010 budget of NASA per year for five years the US could have Oak Ridge National Laboratory and an industrial partner prepare plans for a commercial 1000 MW Thorium Molten Salt Reactor that would, in the future, greatly reduce the amount of toxic high level waste that would have to be placed in the Yucca Mountain Repository. Approximately 1.8 billion dollars a year for five years could fund a complete NRC certifiable approved reactor design that could be quickly adopted and built by utilities wanting to provide improved nuclear power. Ongoing design efforts at the Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie in Grenoble, France and in Japan are underway to produce new, updated, Thorium Molten Salt Reactor designs. It might be possible to bootstrap design efforts by joining with the French and Japanese on a combined, updated, NRC reviewable commercial TMSR reactor design and share the costs of development.

    Reply
  • Alternative Energy Financing 03/9/09 12:59 PM

    I wonder what the size of a backyard storage system would be? I know portable solar generators can store a modest amount in batteries arranged in large coolers, but I wonder how large a residential system would have to be?

    Reply

Green Light

Greentech Media's Green Light blog covers the full-scope of the greentech world, while expanding the range of our daily news reporting with brief and insightful blog posts from our Greentech Media editors, GTM Research analysts and numerous guest bloggers.

.