
The two big suppliers of equipment for amorphous silicon-based photovoltaic production, Oerlikon and Applied Materials, were all over Intersolar last week in San Francisco.
Chris O'Brien is the head of marketing development at Oerlikon, a century old technology company with 18,000 employees and overall revenue of $4.5 billion.
Oerlikon has sold more than 400 megawatts of thin-film manufacturing capacity, with more than 963,000 panels built and with 200 megawatts under contract.
According to O'Brien,
- "The fundamental drivers for growth have not changed."
- "There is still abundant room for growth."
- "Thin film will grow faster than the rest of the solar market."
O'Brien sees Oerlikon Solar's role as "growing a fleet of [a-Si] customers and making them competitive in the years to come."
Oerlikon's technology is "micromorph tandem junction a-Si." In addition to the a-Si layer, the micromorph cell has a tandem structure with an additional microcrystalline absorber. This layer converts the energy of the red and near IR spectrum. Oerlikon claims that it has a cost roadmap to "reduce pricing from $1.50/W to $0.70/W" within a year and that its technology offers a reduction in labor, maintenance, capex, and opex.
Oerlikon guarantees a 9.3 percent efficiency for equipment it is selling today.
But one needs a little bit of caution when considering efficiency numbers. There has been talk about an 11 percent efficient Oerlikon module. This is often quoted as "initial efficiency."
Amorphous silicon exhibits a light-induced degradation of its optoelectronic properties called the Staebler-Wronski effect. This degradation effect is associated with the high diffusion coefficient of hydrogen and the changes in local bonding coordination promoted by hydrogen.
The U.S. program eliminated Staebler-Wronski instability in 1990/91 by insisting that only stabilized efficiencies be reported. A champion module may show 20 percent degradation, so an 11 percent efficient champion module is no better than a 9 percent stabilized module. Oerlikon has brought that instability back by reporting initial efficiency.
Be careful in comparing efficiencies across different vendors and pay attention to that "initial efficiency."




