• Monday, December 28, 2009 Latest Update: 7:49AM
Eric Wesoff | May 22, 2009 at 12:29 AM 7 Comments

The Coming Disruption in the PV Inverter Market

Until recently, the electronics used in PV systems – inverters and Balance of System (BoS) have been an overlooked and underinvested part of the solar ecosystem – despite being a multi-billion dollar market in itself and a product that serves as the principle point of failure in almost all solar power installations.

But lately, there has been a surge in investment and entrepreneurial activity in solar BoS – specifically the inverter and power conditioning circuitry that supports photovoltaic energy conversion. 

The Role of Inverters

The inverter is the connection between the solar array and the electric grid.  DC power produced by photovoltaic solar panels must be converted to clean sinusoidal 50- or 60-Hz AC power for use by appliances and for feeding back into the electrical grid, whether at the residential, commercial, or utility level.  DC-AC inverters perform this function and serve as the heart of the grid-connected PV system.

Today, solar panels are typically wired in “series strings.”  There are a number of drawbacks and performance losses that originate from this longstanding method that include:

•    Shading Loss
•    Complex System Design
•    Panel Mismatch Loss 
•    Difficulty in upgrading or replacing panels with newer, better solar modules
•    Little or inadequate installation feedback or fault detection
•    Safety issues for panel installer, electrician, and fire fighters

New Inverter Architectures

Two new and potentially disruptive “distributed inverter architectures” are being applied to solar deployments:

•    Microinverter or parallel architectures
•    Distributed MPPT or DC-DC bus architectures

They are very different approaches but both methods potentially offer substantial benefits including:
•    Anywhere from 5% to 25% improved energy harvest
•    Easier installation – reduced system engineering
•    Cheaper installation – less time spent on the roof and reduced wiring cost

If reliability issues can be confidently addressed – there is good reason to believe that distributed inverter architectures will challenge and eventually eclipse the business of centralized inverters.  It is this analyst’s opinion that within five to six years, the majority of solar installations will be using variations of the distributed inverter theme.

This creates a challenge for today’s incumbent inverter vendors and an enormous market- transforming opportunity for entrepreneurs and investors.

Lots more details on this disruptive new technology and this new market are in the latest issue of the Greentech Innovations Report.

Comments [7]

  • Carl Hage 05/23/09 11:34 AM

    Beside the usual parallel connection of inverter outputs, another possibility with microinverters would be to connect them in series in order to use lower voltage (and lower cost) electronics inside. For example, to get 240V AC, 5 series connected inverters could be programmed to synchronously generate 48VAC. If one fails self-test/monitoring, a failover bypass engages, and the remaining inverters output 60VAC, etc. Depending on the MPPT of each panel, voltages vary in the converters proportional to the power output of each panel. Conceivably, the microinverter (or set of inverters) could receive a set of low voltage sub-panel outputs, optimizing each with MPPT, so a partly shadowed panel could still operate at power proportional to the sunlit area. (The traditional series connection inside a panel means if only part of the panel is shaded, the remaining portions of the panel are sub-optimal.) It seems microinverters could be a boon to IC manufacturers—the market would be huge compared to the current voltage regulator IC production.

    Reply
      • Steve Pluvia 05/24/09 5:24 PM

        If inverters are the “principal point of failure in almost all PV systems…” why would it make sense to install 4000 small inverters vs a few big ones?  Inquiring minds want to know…  Anyone installing PV that has partial daily shading is an id-jet.  Sure it is nice to know when a bird takes a dump on a panel causing an output drop, but why would anyone replace a few problems with 4000 more problems?.  Me no understand this logic.

  • Eric Wesoff 05/24/09 9:58 PM

    Steve,
    It’s a good question.
    I’ve asked the same question of the microinverter firms and their investors and their answer goes along these lines:
    In a solar farm with several thousand panels - when the big central inverter goes down - the entire installation is out of commission.  This actually ends up resulting in a down time of something like 4% per year.
    When a microinverter fails , the system stay on and that unit is replaced as part of regular maintenance resulting in an up time of 99.9%.  That’s their story and they’re sticking by it.  Are you a convert now?
    Also, the microinverter firms are now offering 10, 15, 20 year warranties and making strides in reliability. 
    Do you believe?

    Reply
  • Peter A 05/25/09 1:27 PM

    @Steve:

    Avoiding single points of failure is the #1 principle of designing complex systems. Your Internet and phone connections work exactly because of this principal.

    Reply
  • Issac S 05/27/09 7:03 AM

    Eric, you have forgotten to mention the one Invert currently that offers a true Parallel Inverter solution in a large scale form factor.  Sustainable Energy Technologies (http://www.sustainableenergy.com)  provides a single parallel inverter from 5k and up.  This gives you all the advantages of a parallel architecture with the cost savings of a large scale architecture.  Unlike the micro inverters, you only have one point of failure.  And it is on the market now.

    Reply
  • D E Mitchel 05/27/09 11:34 AM

    The micro-inverter provides an opportunity to design closely with the particular characteristics of a specific module. So a thin film with a different power and temperature curve will receive a different inverter than a crystaline silicon module.  At some point we might start thinking about a set of “nano” inverters with several placed on one module. With field replacement optimization, a standard push in plug and perhaps temperature sensitive paint or plastic case that could point to a part that has overheated and failed?  Place the plugs on the side rail to use the frame as mounting point and temp sink.

    Reply
  • Noah S 06/4/09 5:22 PM

    Has there been any HALT testing done on these, or side by side efficiency comparisons with large scale inverter architecture to validate all the hype?  Just because it’s new doesn’t mean it’s tried and true.  A 4% avg. annual down time of a portion of the system is much more attractive if the flip side is an avg. 4% lower efficiency across the board 99.9% of the year.

    Reply

Green Light

Greentech Media's Green Light blog covers the full-scope of the greentech world, while expanding the range of our daily news reporting with brief and insightful blog posts from our Greentech Media editors, GTM Research analysts and numerous guest bloggers.

.