• Friday, November 20, 2009 Latest Update: 4:41PM
Eric Wesoff | October 29, 2009 at 1:04 PM 9 Comments

SPI Blog, Part 3: eIQ and the Distributed PV Electronics Field

eIQ is one of many startups that have emerged in the last few years with an eye toward innovation in the photovoltaic inverter / balance of system market. The global inverter market is sizable and estimated at $2.4 billion in 2009.

The central inverter incumbents include SMA, SatCon, Fronius, Xantrex, PV Powered, and many more.

Here is a list of most of the startups chasing this market:

Rather than build the next central inverter, most of these firms are trying to distribute the electronics in the solar installation and they all have their own little twist on how they are performing that trick.

eIQ uses a DC-to-DC boost architecture that relies on parallel interconnection, ostensibly simplifying the design and reducing the amount of wire, combiner boxes and labor required to install a system. Like almost all of the firms on the list above – eIQ distributes the Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) function and corrects for panel mismatch caused by shading, soling or degradation. This can yield significant more energy energy harvest, from 5 percent to 30 percent, depending on the enthusiasm of the marketing person pontificating.

I spoke with Michael Lamb, VP of Business Development and Gene Krzywinski the CTO of the firm.

The early stage startup, funded with $10 million from NGEN and Robert Bosch Venture Capital, already has some market traction – evidenced by its work with Signet Solar, an amorphous silicon panel vendor. "Signet is making a choice to bundle their products with ours because of the systems issues we address," said Krzywinski. 

The CTO continued: "We allow more Signet panels to be connected per bus – 75 Signet panels per DC bus (9 to 10 kilowatts per string) versus 4 to 5 kilowatts with other architectures," adding, "The others in the market control the current and eIQ works more in the voltage domain."

Pricing at small quantities is 40 cents per watt for the company's system alone. The customer does have to include a central inverter but the company claims that the savings that eIQ provides are in the Balance of System budget which includes wiring, combiner boxes, junction boxes, conduit and labor saying "That budget is bigger than the inverter budget – up to $1 per watt," said Krzywinski.

In addition to working with Signet, the firm has partnered with PV Powered.  There were First Solar panels in the demo room as well.

The bottom line according to Signet is that "eIQ helps the partner inverter become more efficient."

Comments [9]

  • StevePluvia 10/29/09 3:52 PM

    Nice report on eIQ. Their design looks impressive, although pricing will be an issue…  I wish they were public…

    Reply
  • Solvida 10/30/09 12:37 AM

    8,571 additional little boxes /3MW project

    Reply
  • StevePluvia 10/30/09 9:52 AM

    Solvida, not every panel requires a box…

    Reply
  • Solvida 10/30/09 12:37 PM

    Stevie P-
    looked on their site,  saw 350W output from a little box and divided 3MW by 350w. did I miss somethin?

    at .4/w that’s $1.2m or 10% added capital cost on a $4/w installed tf job.

    Reply
      • StevePluvia 10/30/09 2:47 PM

        Solvida, it depends. How were they strung?  Max panels possible per box or less?

  • Solvida 10/30/09 5:54 PM

    right….. my point (s) is that I don’t endorse this approach to improving PV system performance on a commercial or utility scale, especially since tf requires higher installed volume than others thus requiring more boxes. I can do a lot to maintain and improve performance on a 3MW site with a $1.2m budget over 10 years (plus labor for installing, replacing and servicing the units) including more frequent washing and specific DC analysis to ensure efficient string operation

    Reply
      • StevePluvia 10/31/09 10:55 AM

        Solvida, fair enough, good thinking.  Are you familiar with any of the new technologies in this space and do you have a favorite top 5?

  • Solvida 11/2/09 12:24 PM

    Steve- good morning, Email me at (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) and i’d be happy to discuss offline.

    Reply
  • eIQ Energy 11/2/09 1:07 PM

    Thanks for the interesting and thoughtful comments! While it may be a bit counter-intuitive, all our analyses show that the Parallel Solar approach can be a cost reducer.

    The vBoost costs on the order of $0.40/watt, but that price provides an entire electrical solution, from the PV to the inverter – not just the incremental vBoost unit. This replaces the traditional string architecture, with its significant numbers of combiner boxes, junction boxes and conduit. Because every vBoost module comes with an integrated wiring harness and connector, installation labor costs are also reduced.

    These costs are easily quantifiable, and in many cases the eIQ Energy solution is less expensive than the traditional string architecture. And all this is before consideration of the additional benefits of incremental harvest due to distributed MPPT, improvements in inverter performance and reliability on a fixed high-voltage bus, and improved performance monitoring and tracking.

    Reply

Green Light

Greentech Media's Green Light blog covers the full-scope of the greentech world, while expanding the range of our daily news reporting with brief and insightful blog posts from our Greentech Media editors, GTM Research analysts and numerous guest bloggers.

.