greenlight

  • Follow:
Wednesday, March 18, 2009 | Latest Update: 2:33PM
Jeff St. John 03 18 09, 2:33 PM

Silver Spring Nabs $15M More

Silver Spring Networks has added another $15 million to its fourth round of funding to help it expand its reach in the smart meter networking field, VentureWire reported Wednesday.

The $15 million investment comes on top of $75 million in series D funds the Redwood City, Calif.-based startup raised in October (see Silver Spring Grabs $75M). Venture firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield and Byers led the round, VentureWire reported. Previous investors have included Foundation Capital, JVB Properties and Northgate Capital.

Add that to the nearly $70 million in venture capital, debt financing and warrants raised since 2007 (see Green Light post and VentureBeat post), and that’s a lot of money for Silver Spring to expand its “Smart Energy Network.”

That now includes about 500,000 smart meters from companies such as Itron, General Electric and Landis+Gyr, embedded with the company’s devices, which communicate to one another and utility access points via meshed radios using Internet protocol (IP)-based networking. Silver Spring expects to have about 2 million meters with its devices installed in place by year’s end.

With large-scale contracts with utiltiies including Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (5 million customers), Florida Power & Light (4.5 million customers) and Pepco Holdings Inc. (1.9 million customers), Silver Spring is set to install its devices in millions more meters over the coming years.

Competitors in the field include smart meter makers that provide networking and communications themselves — Itron, GE, Landis+Gyr, Sensus and Elster are the big ones — as well as rival networking providers such as AclaraTrilliantEka Systems and SmartSynch.

Those companies use different means of carrying data for energy management and control between utilities and customers via the smart meter — and whether they utilize open standards or should be deemed proprietary is a topic of some debate (see Smart Grid: A Matter of Standards).

No doubt all of these companies will be vying for a piece of the $4.5 billion in grants for smart grid projects contained in the stimulus package signed into law last month (see Obama Signs Stimulus Package). That funding is tied to using open standards when available and appropriate.

Comments

  • Srini Krishnamurthy 03/19/09 4:24 AM

    It’s misleading to attach any prefix or suffix to the term “IP”. That gives the impression that it is actually an “IP” product, which is not the case. The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), the global standards body is the sole authority on everything and all that is “IP”. The IETF standards are published in documents known as RFCs (Request For Comments) and is available to all at no cost.

    There are no published IETF RFCs for: IP-like, IP-based, IP-Addressable and other suffixed/prefixed marketing incarnations of IP.  Either it is “IP” or it is not.  For all those who are looking for real answers please refer to IETF document “RFC-4294:IPv6 end-point requirements” that defines the technical compliance and what it means to be just “IP”.  There is no ambiguity here.

    IETF is an organization of technical experts, deviod of marketing agendas. It’s only prudent that objective industry reporting diligently follow that IP standard.

    Reply
Need an avatar? Get one here: Gravatar

Green Light

Greentech Media's Green Light blog covers the full-scope of the greentech world, while expanding the range of our daily news reporting with brief and insightful blog posts from our Greentech Media editors, GTM Research analysts and numerous guest bloggers.

.