greenlight

  • Follow:
Friday, April 10, 2009 | Latest Update: 9:40AM
Eric Wesoff 04 10 09, 9:40 AM

Secret Solar at the White House With Steven Strong

More Bloggage from the BIPV Summit in San Diego—

Steven Strong  was the lead-off speaker at a recent BIPV event (see BIPV (vs. BAPV and BSPV) and The Yoda of PV) . He is a leading authority on integrating renewable energy systems, especially solar, in buildings in North America. Strong’s firm consults to architects on the integration of solar power, and to the building industry on product development through his firm, Solar Design Associates.

Over the past 25 years, Steven has designed scores of solar buildings including the world’s first PV-powered neighborhood in central Massachusetts in 1984, and in what was the world’s largest PV installation at the time—the Natatorium Complex at the 1996 Olympic Summer Games in Atlanta.

Amongst his many PV installation accomplishments, Strong was involved in a semi-clandestine solar mission—deploying solar in the less-than-friendly environment of the Bush/Cheney White House compound at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, D.C.

“The dialogue actually began with the prior tenant,” Strong explained.  “But Clinton was distracted by interns and impeachment,” and Strong never heard from the Clinton people after that.

Then, nine months after the start of the W. administration, Strong visited the site and spent the entire day with the White House architect.  They looked at all the potential siting opportunities, excepting the main mansion which is “covered with spook stuff.”  (BTW: The White House grounds are managed by the Parks Service)

Strong ended up helping design and install a 10kW+ photovoltaic system and two thermal solar systems within the compound.  All the inverters had to go to the secret service warehouse for clearance, presumably for inspection for listening devices and explosives.  The system was installed on one of those few occasions when the President was at his ranch clearing brush and the VP was at an undisclosed location.

If you wonder why you didn’t hear more about this seemingly positive news from the W. press office—well, in an administration that had a VP saying things like, “conservation may be a sign of personal virtue, but it is not a sufficient basis for a sound, comprehensive energy policy,” the presence of PV on the White House never made it to their talking points.

Comments

  • Eric Wesoff 04/13/09 6:43 AM

    Thanks Steve. I chose not to respond to Mr. 4 cents per kWh and appreciate that you did.

    Reply
  • DR 04/11/09 6:55 PM

    “conservation may be a sign of personal virtue, but it is not a sufficient basis for a sound, comprehensive energy policy,” ——-A refreshing thought and full of clarity, in my view.

    Current PV debate is driven by half baked emotional ideas with little consideration to actual costs. If we replace 4-5c/KWh of electricity generating cost with PV energy generating cost of 25c/KWh…we will be all collectively poor in upcoming years…..

    I am not against PV…..actually I would love to move to solar when or where it makes economic sense.  Lets select our electricity generating systems driven by hard economics truths…..not by emotions .

    DR

    Reply
  • StevePluvia 04/13/09 6:04 AM

    DR—In what dream world can you buy electricity for 4-5c/KWH?  First solar installed a 12.6MW PV farm in Dec ‘08 that produces power at 7-8c/KWH.  Google “First Solar” and “Grid Parity”.  PV grid parity is here if you buy and install correctly.  Maybe you should do more research as your argument is based on numbers that are wrong.

    Reply
Need an avatar? Get one here: Gravatar

Green Light

Greentech Media's Green Light blog covers the full-scope of the greentech world, while expanding the range of our daily news reporting with brief and insightful blog posts from our Greentech Media editors, GTM Research analysts and numerous guest bloggers.

.