• Friday, November 20, 2009 Latest Update: 4:41PM
Michael Kanellos | December 22, 2008 at 6:18 AM 11 Comments

News Roundup: Solar Crunch in Conneticut, Losses for Toyota, and Aussie Carbon Cuts

It’s another dismal day in the neighborhood.

Connecticut’s solar initiative—which had hoped to offer consumers subsidies for installing solar systems over the next two years, is out of cash six months into the project says the Green Inc. blog at the New York Times. The governor is trying to scrape a little cash together and the federal tax incentives passed in the week of the financial debacle could help, but installers are worried.

Spain went through a similar turmoil, which lead to an oversupply of panels. Connecticut is much smaller so the same won’t likely occur.

Meanwhile, Nikkei Net (subscription required) reports that Toyota may suffer a $1.67 billion (that’s U.S., not Yen) in fiscal 2008. It would be the company’s first since 1940.

Elsewhere, Green Car Congress says Australia wants to reduce carbon emissions to 5 percent to 15 percent below 2000 levels by 2020. That’s less ambitious than some plans—President elect Obama wants to cut them to 80 percent of 1990 levels by 2050—but that also makes the Australian ones more realistic. It will also have a carbon market by 2010.

Meanwhile, News.com writes about Alex Cheimets, a homeowner in Massachusetts who is covering his house with two layers of foam board to insulate it. It’s to save energy, not to win style points. This one seems weird to me. There are actually great insulating materials—such as aerogels—you can use on the inside of your home. But he is saving a lot of power.

At TechOn, check out a Q&A on Honda’s battery initiative.

And finally, VentureBeat has an interview with creamy-skinned VC Steve Jurveston on why cleantech will do OK in the downturn.

Comments [11]

  • StevePluvia 12/25/08 8:01 AM

    The really kewl thing about aerogels is their dual function; light transmission plus super insulating; the ability to engineer walls that transmit outdoor light and are highly insulated.  Unfortunately, their cost is a killer, and the fact you pretty much need to custom design, engineer and construct using bulk aerogel product presents multiple challenges.

    Reply
  • StevePluvia 12/24/08 12:51 PM

    Mike K,

    Stop with the aerogel love affair.  Sure it looks kewl, but its stoooopid expensive.  It has no utility in residential or commercial building construction.

    Reply
  • adams571 01/2/09 3:02 AM

    Light is the traffic cop at the intersection of green technology, business and policy. We cover the highs and lows of the greentech market, providing news,...

    ahahahahah)))))

    —————-
    Sponsor: viagra - Grab cheapest viagra!

    Reply
  • castillo822 01/2/09 3:03 AM

    News Roundup: Solar Crunch in Conneticut, Losses for Toyota, and Aussie Carbon Cuts

    I found 3 mistakes here )))

    —————-
    sponsored link: viagra - Enter And Check It Lowest Prices.

    Reply
  • mangini728 01/2/09 3:08 AM

    News Roundup: Solar Crunch in Conneticut, Losses for Toyota, and Aussie Carbon Cuts

    can you see the mistake here?

    —————-
    my sponsor: viagra - 100% Privacy, 100% Guarantee!!!

    Reply
  • shawn 01/20/09 8:53 AM

    I have reclaimed/recycled foam board insulation for 50-70 percent less than new material, My material is in good usable condition-retains r levels and is economic and environmentally friendly.

    Shawn O’Malley-888-820-2760*54-Insulation Depot

    Reply
  • Alex Cheimets 12/24/08 7:28 PM

    I looked at aerogel for about 10 minutes until the costs were known.  The thought of interior insulation was also one I had toyed with for years.  It’s room by room at reasonable pace as opposed to the entire bloody house.  It is just not a very good way to insulate.  Can’t insulate the floor joists, or the wall connections, or where the showers and plumbing are.
    What do they say, super-insulating on the outside is the worst way to do it, except when you compare it to all the other options.  If they could squeeze the insulation into a thinner cross section, we might have been able to save on the window jamb extensions.

    As for the look of the house, I’ve seen one done this way in Concord, Mass and it looks great.  If you didn’t know, you wouldn’t guess.  Don’t hold me responsible for the color, I was out-voted.

    Reply
  • Rod Williams 12/23/08 4:21 AM

    External insulation allows the mass of the external walls and roof to store heat and to reduce temperature swings, also it avoids a reduction in living space.  This is a standard approach used to reach Passive House standard energy usage in retrofits.  For certification the Passive House standard requires energy usage for space heating to be below 15 kWh per metre per annum.  This is 90-95% lower energy usage than typical buildings.

    Reply
  • Michael Kanellos 12/23/08 9:54 AM

    but what if you used just better insulation inside, like an aerogel or that foil backed stuff with air pockets. I just wonder which would work better for teh buck. either way, you have some retrofitting to do.

    Reply
  • StevePluvia 12/22/08 8:31 AM

    MIke,

    Aerogels are kewl to play with, but from a cost perspective they’re ridiculous.  They have no economic viability in residential construction.

    Reply

Green Light

Greentech Media's Green Light blog covers the full-scope of the greentech world, while expanding the range of our daily news reporting with brief and insightful blog posts from our Greentech Media editors, GTM Research analysts and numerous guest bloggers.

.