• Friday, November 20, 2009 Latest Update: 4:41PM
Michael Kanellos | October 21, 2008 at 4:29 PM 8 Comments

Is This the Way to Build Electric Cars?

Ultracapacitors have been a star attraction in scientific research for years, but the component might be best suited for a supporting role in the commercial world, says Alex Shnaydruk at APowerCap Technologies.

APowerCap Technologies is trying to bring a novel breed of ultracapacitors — which are essentially holding tanks for electrons — to the automotive and electronics market in a way that better fits economic reality. APowerCap won’t sell ultracapacitors to power electric cars. Instead, it is prepping a line of ultracapacitors to charge the batteries in electric cars, which will in turn run the car. That’s similar to the way General Motors will use a gas generator to charge the batteries on the Chevy Volt, but without the gas.

In a nutshell, the problem with ultracapacitors is cost, he said during a presentation and meeting at the Dow Jones Alternative Energy Innovations conference taking place in beautiful Redwood City, Calif. this week. Employing ultracapacitors to power a car would break the component budget. Other than that massive problem, ultracaps are great. They can be charged in a few seconds and can discharge rapidly as well.

The first project out of the company is KERS, which stands for Kinetic Energy Recuperation System. It is an “energy recuperation� system commissioned by a company that supplies components to Formula 1 cars. The KERS charger will consist of 200 of APowerCap’s cells. That is a single cell in the picture. The company showed off a 14-cell prototype at a meeting.

APowerCap will subsequently move onto producing ultracapacitors for electronic bikes, a growing market in Asia and even Europe, as well as power storage devices for notebooks and other electronic devices. Using an ultracapacitor can take some of the bulk out of a phone or other product, he said.

The company is also working with a lead acid battery maker to supplement more traditional batteries. In tests, APowerCap was able to show that a lead acid battery supplemented by its ultracapacitors required only one third of the lead of traditional lead acid batteries, lasted 2.5 times as long, and worked well in cold weather. The overall volume of the battery was also 60 percent smaller. (Lead acid, by the way, isn’t dead. Axion Power International is also building carbon cathodes for lead acid batteries while Firefly Energy is making a membrane for lead acid batteries. Both of these companies have received investment funds from the Quercus Trust.)

“Most of our intellectual property is in the electrode,� he said. The electrode is made of carbon sheets measuring only a few hundred nanometers thick or less. Current is collected by aluminum strips. Thus, two key components of the battery are made from two of the more common elements on Earth.

“We use just regular carbon,� he said. How the carbon molecules arrange themselves in the sheets, however, determine its properties.

If the company can move from the science experiment stage to mass manufacturing, it could find a receptive audience. The lengthy charging times of batteries and the limited range remain two of the big stumbling blocks to the greater acceptance of electric cars. (Think of it: Will consumers really want to swap car batteries, like Project Better Place has proposed for getting around the charge time issue.) Ultracapacitors can put a dent in that, although cost would still be a big question.

APowerCap, by the way, comes out of the Ukraine. It has received some funding from local VCs and is now seeking $10 million. It has delivered samples to potential customers, he said. Ukraine isn’t a hotbed of startup activity, but all the countries east of the Vistula are certainly well regarded for their science.

Some large automakers are already thinking in the same direction as APowerCap too. Two weeks ago, I interviewed Minoru Shinohara, senior vice president of the technology development department at Nissan. He said that the company was trying to figure out a way to make an electric car that could charge itself while driving. Nissan’s goal, however, would be to recharge the battery electrically, not with a gas generator. An ultracap might work better than a fuel cell for that task.

Comments [8]

  • Alex Shnaydruk 11/2/08 9:22 PM

    Dear Mike!

    I am not the owner of APowerCap Technologies, Mr. Serhiy Loboyko is. Could you please reflect that in your blog ASAP? Thank you very much, Alex.

    Reply
  • Serhiy VC 11/13/08 7:51 AM

    Hi Tre! Hi Joe Real!
    UC is not the energy device, but it is power device. Therefore, the best solution is - the proper combination of battery or fuel cell and ultracapacitor.
    Btw: GM is already looking into supercaps with li-ion batteries for next-gen E-Flex. South Korean automitives are are looking for such solution, too.

    Reply
  • Serhiy VC 11/15/08 1:53 AM

    To avoid misunderstanding - UC aimed not to charge battery, but to cover their peak discharge (e.g. at engine starting), which is harmful for any kind of battery or to accumulate kinetic energy (e.g. at breaking), which battery is losing bcs of its lower efficiency compare to UC.
    Also, combination of UC with fuel cell can significantly increase attractiveness of fuel cells as an energy source and they can start to win competition with the batteries.

    Reply
  • Michael Kanellos 11/3/08 4:55 AM

    you work there, that was the idea.

    Reply
  • Tre 10/22/08 4:29 AM

    What I don’t understand is if you can charge the ultracaps in a car enough to then charge the batteries, why not just get rid of the batteries altogether and put in even more ultracaps?

    Reply
  • Michael Kanellos 10/22/08 8:36 AM

    too expensive.

    Reply
  • JoeReal 10/22/08 10:53 AM

    I can understand recharging by plugging the car when parked. I also understand regenerative braking. 

    For the electric powered cars, where does the ultracap gets its power to recharge the batteries while driving the car? Do the ultracaps have more energy per unit volume than the batteries?

    Reply
  • bielie 10/24/08 6:55 AM

    They say it has 4.5wh/kg energy density. That is one tenth of a lead acid battery, (and one hundredth of what EEstor says their ultracap will be able to do.)  So if you want to use an ultracap to quickly charge a lead acid battery, you need ten kg’s of ultracap for every kg of lead acid battery. The Altair Nano battery has an energy density of about 80wh/kg andcan charge in afew minutes.  It is proven technology that is already commercially available. Why would you use such a low energy device in an application where energy density is the one most important factor? Sorry,it makes no sense to me.

    Reply

Green Light

Greentech Media's Green Light blog covers the full-scope of the greentech world, while expanding the range of our daily news reporting with brief and insightful blog posts from our Greentech Media editors, GTM Research analysts and numerous guest bloggers.

.