greenlight

  • Follow:
Tuesday, August 4, 2009 | Latest Update: 6:56PM
Michael Kanellos 08 04 09, 6:56 PM

Intel Becomes Lab for Flash Versus Drive Debate

What's better – flash memory or hard drives?

Intel will tell us.

The chipmaking giant has conducted its own internal tests on how solid state drives, made up of flash memory, can be incorporated into a corporate computing environment. Intel makes flash drives, so there is clearly a vested interest here, but the tests were conducted by its own IT group.

The results? Hard drives fail around 5 percent of the time. Flash drives will fail around 0.5 percent of the time, according to Dave Buchholz, the IT technology evangelist at Intel who oversaw the tests. Batteries can also last longer in flash-based notebook and give notebook owners 15 percent better battery life.

Hard drives also run about 40 degrees hotter.

As a result, Intel is starting to get flash-based notebooks for its employees. Eighty percent of Intel employees work on laptops so this will become one of the earliest, largest experiments with flash notebooks. Flash may get incorporated into desktops and servers, but likely won't get used as primary storage vehicles. A lot of the desktops are owned by design engineers and they need the cumbersome space (1 terabyte or so) that standard hard drives can provide. Flash, though, may be used to store the operating system for faster boot-up.

As the flash notebooks proliferate through Intel, the world hopefully will get more data to see what sort of difference solid state storage can make.

Buchholz, by the way, will speak at the Flash Memory Summit in San Jose next week. (Disclosure: So will I.)

Comments

  • SSDIsSolid 01/24/10 3:46 AM

    I also read that SSD’s can sustain more reads and writes than a regular HD.  So I don’t know where all these dummies come that are so terrified about someone defragmenting their SSD.  There’s likely no reason to defragment one, but they are so upset, LOL.  This is what happens with new tech.  They get protective of it which is funny.  It’s just a $250 drive.  Who cares?  The thing is that since you don’t need to do it, you could prolong the life of a SSD by not defragging it.  So then it would last even longer.  But it’s not like it will fall apart if you defrag it.  It’s just like a hard drive.  I’ve had many hard drives last over 10 years.  In fact all of them still work in my house.  I have computers over 15 years old too.  And they’ve all been defragmented oodles of times.  So to those afraid.  Don’t be.  Here’s what I’d do.  I’d defrag my SSD like one time a year.  Why?  Just because the file structure turns into a mess after a while.  Not that it’s needed.  It’s just nice to do.  But not more because it wears it out needlessly.  But again, if did it more frequently?  No big deal because it lasts longer than a hard drive anyway…  Yet it would be pointless to do so.

    Reply

Green Light

Greentech Media's Green Light blog covers the full-scope of the greentech world, while expanding the range of our daily news reporting with brief and insightful blog posts from our Greentech Media editors, GTM Research analysts and numerous guest bloggers.

.