• Friday, November 20, 2009 Latest Update: 4:41PM
Ucilia Wang | February 17, 2009 at 3:29 PM 3 Comments

GM, Chrysler Could Require $21.6B More in Gov’t Loans to Survive

Can you spare another $21.6 billion?

General Motors and Chrysler collectively requested that amount in federal aid Tuesday as they filed their progress reports to Congress. Congress has provided $17.4 billion in loans to both companies since last December, along with a list of requirements to ensure that money would be well spent on rescuing the two firms. Lawmakers gave the companies until March 31 to show they can turn around their operations and make money, or else they would lose the loans.

Both companies said Tuesday that the car market isn’t getting better, and they are likely to need more loans to survive.

GM, which has received $13.4 billion in loans so far, said it could require as much as $16.6 billion more in loans by 2011, reported Bloomberg. GM is asking for at least $9.1 billion in the near future (see GM’s progress report summary).

GM said it also added another five facilities to the list of factory closures it had proposed in December, bringing the total of factories to be closed between 2008 and 2012 to 14. The company had 47 manufacturing plants back in 2008.

Chrysler, which has received $4 billion from the loan program so far, wants another $5 billion. The company plans to layoff 3,000 people by the end of this year (see Chrysler’s progress report summary).

Both companies promise to develop and sell more fuel-efficient cars, including electric vehicles, as part of their restructuring plans. GM expects to launch its Chevy Volt, a much touted plug-in hybrid electric car next year. Chrysler also outlined a launch schedule for electric cars last September.

Comments [3]

  • mike bove 02/18/09 7:00 AM

    I never understood why a Private Equity owned company like Chrysler should be getting government debt financing from taxpayer money. If Chrysler’s ownership can’t operate the company without regular market provided financing (debt or equity), they sell it and cut your losses. Since when was it not acceptable, in a capitalistic market,  to lose?

    Reply
  • Peter Antypas 02/18/09 7:49 AM

    I completely disagree with the bailout of all industries (Detroit & Wall St included). Government should create a safety net for people falling through the cracks, not prop up failed institutions.

    Big Auto will die no matter how much money we keep pumping into it. US banks are basically broke and nothing sort of a nationalization will fix it. Our taxes will have to go up in the next few years and even the Republicans know it.

    Our brand of capitalism has failed, and we need a different one in its place. Why are we still trying to “restore” institutions that no longer serve us? When a building collapses, we don’t restore it—we tear it down and build another one in its place. It’s cheaper.

    Reply
  • kery bradshaw 02/17/09 4:30 PM

    Detroit viability rests entirely upon their ability to ditch preposterously expensive union contracts. period. Won’t happen as longas the Dems support those who have contributed tens of miillions to their campaigns.

    Reply

Green Light

Greentech Media's Green Light blog covers the full-scope of the greentech world, while expanding the range of our daily news reporting with brief and insightful blog posts from our Greentech Media editors, GTM Research analysts and numerous guest bloggers.

.