• Friday, November 20, 2009 Latest Update: 4:41PM
Jeff St. John | February 18, 2009 at 2:41 PM 3 Comments

Energy Secretary Chu Wants Standards for Smart Grid

Energy Secretary Steven Chu has weighed in on the issue of standards for the smart grid, saying Wednesday that he's going to push to make sure they're in place to keep smart grid technologies being deployed today from growing obsolete. The DOE head and Nobel Prize-winning physicist's comments in a Wednesday conference call with reporters (via Earth2Tech) come amidst a growing debate over standards for smart grid deployments. With a wide variety of communications and networking technologies out there for the millions of "smart meters" being deployed by U.S. utilities, companies are staking out competitive positions on just how "standards-based" their technologies are (see Smart Grid: a Matter of Standards). There could be $4.4 billion at stake. That's the amount the stimulus bill signed into law by President Barack Obama on Tuesday contained for grants for smart grid related projects (another $100 million was set aside for worker training, bringing the total to $4.5 billion). But language in a draft version of the bill linked the ability of utilities to receive a portion of those grants to using Internet protocol (IP) in their projects — and that drew the ire of traditional smart meter makers Itron, Landis+Gyr, Sensus and Aclara, which made their displeasure known in a letter to U.S. Senators. Those companies have used proprietary technologies in their smart meter communications networking, though some are also moving to incorporate IP as well. Eric Dresselhuys, a vice president at Silver Spring Networks, said the final stimulus bill contained language that linked the $4.4 billion in grants to using open standards that could include IP or other standards — but only "if available and appropriate." That will give needed discretion to utilities looking to DOE for guidance as it sets up a program to administer the grants, which is is supposed to do within 60 days, he said. "The real challenge will be, how does DOE set up a clear, transparent process to quickly move this money into the field," he said. Using IP for smart meter networking has been the rallying cry of Silver Spring, which has called for open standards language to be included in any federal support for smart grid deployment (see Draft Stimulus Plan Has Billions for Smart Grid). But when it comes to certain smart grid tasks — such as automating distribution networks — other standards widely used by utilities, such as DNP3 (Distributed Network Protocol), may make more sense than IP, Dresselhuys said. And the issue of open standards extends beyond networking protocols, he noted.

"The gist of what we think the government wants to get to is that the systems have to be open everywhere," he said. "You can have open networking with proprietary applications systems, and that wouldn’t be good."

Determining just what makes for standards in smart grid will likely fall to the National Institute for Standards and Technology, which received $10 million in the stimulus bill to develop a smart grid interoperabilty framework. The institute was given the task of developing "protocols and model standards for information management to achieve interoperability of smart grid devices and systems," in the 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act. That could help clear up confusion about the definition of open standards in an industry that's still relatively young. For example, while Silver Spring champions IP as an open standard for smart meter networking, competitors like Trilliant have countered by saying that the radio mesh systems that Silver Spring and other smart meter makers use are based on proprietary physical data transmission technologies — unlike Trilliant's radios based on the 802.15.4 protocol. Yet other smart grid companies complain that the industry's technology is still too young for clear standards to have emerged. “There are bits and pieces emerging, but there isn’t one definitive approach or standard,� said Srini Krishnamurthy, vice president of corporate development for Eka Systems, which has developed a smart meter networking technology that the company says is "IP-compliant" but which other observers label as proprietary.

Comments [3]

  • bg 02/20/09 4:33 AM

    Toby - you make some good points, but you’re point that “alternative energy” causes more peak energy events is not really accurate.  There is certainly an issue with such sources as wind and solar which cannot reliably supply base load power, but in places like California, solar is a great source to deal with peak power, where their peak events usually occur on sunny days in the summer when solar is most efficient and effective.

    Reply
  • TobyConsidine 02/20/09 2:10 AM

    Nice write up of some complex activities going on right now. I would add only one aspect missed.

    The real opportunity of the smart grid is its ability to work with more business models then the current top down reliable far-away power for dumb buildings and homes. The smart grid will support a network of power, with a network of new business opportunities for technology to insert itself into the energy chain.

    Alternative Energy changes the grid because it is unreliable. If any significant amount of power on the grid comes from unreliable sources, we will have more peak energy events, when demand exceeds supply, per day than we now have per year. Distributed energy means that the neighborhood wind farm is now a full peer on the grid. Net Zero Energy means your dishwasher might bid against the grid for the output of your solar panel.

    The smart grid offers choice. Homes and business will choose what power they buy, and they will want the smart grid to be auditable that they actually are getting it. A decade ago, supermarkets laughed at the idea that a significant number of consumers would choose more expensive groceries. Today, Whole Foods has transformed that industry and nearly every chain offers an organic produce section. Why, you may even buy conventional reliable power to run your business but tell the fountain out front to run only when it can buy wave power. You may agree to pay a slight premium for your neighbors wind power when he is on vacation to keep his system working.

    Some homes might not need or want smart meters. Some businesses and homes might have internal grids making internal allocations with many meters. We, or our software agents will be active market participants in the national smart grid, in regional smart grids, in neighborhood smart grids, and even in in-building grids.

    Reply
  • Dan Wiscoft 02/18/09 7:43 PM

    Who is kidding who here with every smart grid integrator interfaced with the Internet they all must use IP standards. You can use IP standards with always on powered devices, however the challenge is in battery powered or energy self proficient devices. Water meters gas meters propane etc, you will have issues on power. Also has anyone calculated how much power will a smart meter draw from the grid to have IP addressable devices? Seems to me there must be a pull from the grid on the digital devices that need processing power to convert analog to digital impulses and interface them with IP addressable silicone. I would fair to say that if you calculated the pull from smart meters you would see a calculated spike or pull on the current infrastructure that is almost none exsistant with mechanical analog spinning wheels on houses.

    Smart Meters are like any other computer that processes data the more you process the more you pull power. Companies like Landis Gyr, Elster, Sensus, GE etc. are driving the smart meter fever however for their own interest, sell more meters, the solution is not increasing consumption by installing SMART METERs that are IP addressable which increase load on the grid. One would think the goal is to reduce consumption. 

    With that thought Smart Grid does not neccessary mean smart meters installed on every home in America. With the internet stacked with more processing power servers than any meter could possible have, one collect data from almost any pulse our sensing IO and agragate and profile data that no meter can do. All you need is a tick count or a pulse count on a house. Smart Meters are part of the pull on the grid that is not neccessary. IP is IP once a device is connected to the internet it is IP capatiable. The smart grid is new and so is the Internet in relative terms.

    Reply

Green Light

Greentech Media's Green Light blog covers the full-scope of the greentech world, while expanding the range of our daily news reporting with brief and insightful blog posts from our Greentech Media editors, GTM Research analysts and numerous guest bloggers.

.