- Neal has some cautionary words about solar...
- These researchers have some cautionary words about cellulosic ethanol...
- Here's a cautionary tale for anyone who's planning on generating a lot of value out of carbon offsets, and planning on today's carbon market pricing in their financial modeling...
- And here are some cautionary words about VCs stretching their investment approach to do quasi project finance (something we've discussed on this site a bit)
European cleantech VCs see 50% IRRs?
Rob Day: September 18, 2007, 5:55 PM
That's the conclusion of New Energy Finance in a new analysis they released today. They studied 129 clean energy investments in Europe by 37 investors and found 15 IPOs, 10 trade sales, 21 up rounds, 19 down rounds or write-downs, and 10 liquidations. All told, they estimated a 54.9% gross annualized return across the portfolio of 129 companies. The study period covered 1998 to the present, and included an estimate of 1.2x valuation on unrealized gains on funds invested.
It's a very positive study, certainly, and helps further illustrate why investors are so keen on this sector right now. It's also a very useful analysis -- but it's important to note a lot of caveats involved. The methodology is hard to figure out from the press release alone, but it's clear there's a lot of potential for some data bias (while it's impressive that 37 investors participated, it looks like the study only covered about half of relevant investments; and as well, it appears the study relies somewhat upon self-reported data from the investors).
I'd also like to see more information about the way that "unrealized holdings, calculated on an industry-standard, conservative basis, are valued at 1.2 times the total funds invested." It's unclear, but in light of the statements that 35 exits have returned 1.4x the funds invested, and the total estimated gains are 2.6x (1.4x + 1.2x), it seems like there's an implication that the ~75% of funds invested that have NOT led to exits may be assumed to have seen some pretty nice paper gains. We may ask the good folks at NEF to write up their methodology for benefit of readers at some point...
Before we all pat ourselves on the back about the healthy returns in this sector, in any case, consider the following:




