• Friday, November 20, 2009 Latest Update: 4:41PM
Rob Day | May 21, 2009 at 10:08 PM 1 Comment

What capital efficiency?

Had the pleasure of moderating a very interesting panel at Boston University today on smart grid and energy efficiency, including representatives from the State of Massachusetts, NSTAR, GE, BU, and Millennial Net.  Lots of optimism about ongoing pilots and smart grid roll-outs.

And of course, here in this column we've talked quite a lot recently about how the cleantech VC community seems to be much more vocal about targeting capital-efficient energy efficiency and smart grid investments these days.

Except that I took a look at the details in the Q1 2009 Cleantech Venture Monitor (another great job by Cleantech Group's Brian Fan and colleagues), and there's no evidence yet of such a shift.

In their tally, solar remains the big dog, at almost 35% of all cleantech venture dollars in the quarter.  That's just barely down from the ~38% it captured in Q1 of last year, for example. 

Biofuels and transportation (not exactly the poster children for capital efficient investment areas) continue to be other big targets for VC dollars, at ~10% and ~20% respectively. 

And where is "smart grid"?  At under a 5% share.  In the Cleantech Group's methodology, energy efficiency investments tend to be spread across a number of different categories, but even the "green buildings" category garnered only ~10%, about the same as in Q1 2008.

Will we see VCs start to put their money where their mouths are in upcoming quarters?  We'll just have to wait and see.

 

Comments [1]

  • Drew 08/23/09 4:34 PM

    Odd that the big dog is the one most dependent on government subsidies for success and even then the ROI is sketchy. Strip out the subsidies and then figure sales at wholesale 6cents per kw/h instead of these phantom high 40cent kw/h that some microgrid people are able to extort from utilities and you get a truer picture of the actual cost of solar. Then factor in real-estate and preventative maintenance to try to get the panels to last half of the warrantee period and suddenly you see the panels will have to be replaced prior to the installation even meeting the ROI. Why do smart VC’s keep pouring their money into this? The fantasy that a moore’s law like development cycle will get costs down to a place that they can be sustainable without subsidies from government or investors? Not sure but seems like pissing against a wind farm (a little better but not by much). VC’s should get smart and focus on business that is sustainable in ANY political climate.

    Reply

Cleantech Investing

Rob Day is a Boston-based cleantech venture capital investor and entrepreneur, and is also the President of the Renewable Energy Business Network (REBN). The views expressed on this blog are those of Rob and his friends and colleagues, not necessarily the views of REBN or Greentech Media or any other group. Contact Rob Day at: (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

.