Ran across this interesting article on Forbes.com full of useful tips for investors who “know that human-caused global warming is hokum.” I’m pretty sure it’s the first time I’ve seen the word “hokum” written this century. The best line refers to the “clueless U.S. venture capital community”... “throwing their investors’ money at futile chimeras based on the idea of a climate crisis.”
Apparently either we VCs really are clueless or we fundamentally disagree (or, I suppose, both). Because according to recently released numbers, cleantech was one of the few areas to see increased VC spending in Q1.
Ernst & Young/ Dow Jones VentureOne announced their tally for Q1 last week. While overall VC spending declined 7% yoy to $6.5B, cleantech totals grew 18% from Q1 ‘07 to $571.6mm. Solar and biofuels (once again) led the pack, although energy efficiency showed a bump as well. These numbers are significantly lower than numbers from other groups like the Cleantech Group, but as we’ve discussed before, the differences are largely methodological and the overall trends remain consistent across surveys. Here’s GTM’s coverage of the E&Y totals.
A couple of things to take note of in particular:Â a) while it’s impressive to see cleantech grow while other sectors declined, those totals suggest cleantech remains less than 10% of all VC spending; and b) while the dollar amounts grew, the number of deals DECLINED by 11%.
Meanwhile, Moneytree/NVCA released their 2007 cleantech VC totals, which they pegged at $2.2B. And yes, solar and biofuels led the pack there, too. They also noted that the highly-anticipated first big wave of cleantech exits is expected this year and next.
So what’s going on? A storyline appears to be coming together that (as we’ve talked about recently) as cleantech venture firms raise much bigger new funds, they’re having to write bigger checks and shift into later-stage investing.
One of the most interesting factoids in the E&Y data was on deal stage, where they note that early stage deals accounted for 37% of cleantech financings in Q1, down from over 50% a year ago.
This also mirrors a trend spotted by some observers (and discussed here as well) that while some cleantech sectors are getting a lot (perhaps too much) attention, others aren’t getting nearly as much attention. Well, of course—as investors move later-stage, they have to double-down on sectors that have already gotten a lot of attention. And as generalists move into this complex and varied sector, the simplest decision on where to focus attention is on the “proven” subsectors… where others are already investing.
It’s a good time to be a small, flexible, disciplined early-stage cleantech specialist. Unless, of course, it’s all hokum…
Deals from the past week:
Other news and notes: Neal shares five investment strategies to play in cleantech... The promises and challenges of solar power... CNet’s top 10 cleantech companies (6 are in solar, and none are in water—really?)... Lux Research points to the strong links between nanotech and cleantech, but has some cautionary words… New England area VCs are starting to look far and wide... Finally, where’s my checkbook?
Rob Day is a Boston-based cleantech venture capital investor and entrepreneur, and is also the President of the Renewable Energy Business Network (REBN). The views expressed on this blog are those of Rob and his friends and colleagues, not necessarily the views of REBN or Greentech Media or any other group. Contact Rob Day at: (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Comments [2]