• Friday, November 20, 2009 Latest Update: 4:41PM
Rob Day | May 12, 2008 at 1:05 PM 2 Comments

“Hokum” and the decline in early-stage cleantech VC

Ran across this interesting article on Forbes.com full of useful tips for investors who “know that human-caused global warming is hokum.”  I’m pretty sure it’s the first time I’ve seen the word “hokum” written this century.  The best line refers to the “clueless U.S. venture capital community”... “throwing their investors’ money at futile chimeras based on the idea of a climate crisis.”

Apparently either we VCs really are clueless or we fundamentally disagree (or, I suppose, both).  Because according to recently released numbers, cleantech was one of the few areas to see increased VC spending in Q1.

Ernst & Young/ Dow Jones VentureOne announced their tally for Q1 last week.  While overall VC spending declined 7% yoy to $6.5B, cleantech totals grew 18% from Q1 ‘07 to $571.6mm.  Solar and biofuels (once again) led the pack, although energy efficiency showed a bump as well.   These numbers are significantly lower than numbers from other groups like the Cleantech Group, but as we’ve discussed before, the differences are largely methodological and the overall trends remain consistent across surveys.  Here’s GTM’s coverage of the E&Y totals.

A couple of things to take note of in particular:  a) while it’s impressive to see cleantech grow while other sectors declined, those totals suggest cleantech remains less than 10% of all VC spending; and b) while the dollar amounts grew, the number of deals DECLINED by 11%.

Meanwhile, Moneytree/NVCA released their 2007 cleantech VC totals, which they pegged at $2.2B.  And yes, solar and biofuels led the pack there, too.  They also noted that the highly-anticipated first big wave of cleantech exits is expected this year and next.

So what’s going on?  A storyline appears to be coming together that (as we’ve talked about recently) as cleantech venture firms raise much bigger new funds, they’re having to write bigger checks and shift into later-stage investing.

One of the most interesting factoids in the E&Y data was on deal stage, where they note that early stage deals accounted for 37% of cleantech financings in Q1, down from over 50% a year ago.

This also mirrors a trend spotted by some observers (and discussed here as well) that while some cleantech sectors are getting a lot (perhaps too much) attention, others aren’t getting nearly as much attention.  Well, of course—as investors move later-stage, they have to double-down on sectors that have already gotten a lot of attention.  And as generalists move into this complex and varied sector, the simplest decision on where to focus attention is on the “proven” subsectors… where others are already investing.

It’s a good time to be a small, flexible, disciplined early-stage cleantech specialist.  Unless, of course, it’s all hokum…

Deals from the past week:

Other news and notes:  Neal shares five investment strategies to play in cleantech...  The promises and challenges of solar power...  CNet’s top 10 cleantech companies (6 are in solar, and none are in water—really?)...  Lux Research points to the strong links between nanotech and cleantech, but has some cautionary words…  New England area VCs are starting to look far and wide...  Finally, where’s my checkbook?

Comments [2]

  • Alex 05/12/08 6:52 PM

    Dear GreentechMedia & @venture,
    One year ago, we started a small company in Latvia and with the help of some angel investors, students and other people who believe in clean and renewable energy the project was launched. After finalizing our IP rights it came down to only one thing that kept us from progressing. MONEY.
    Solar botanic is making natural looking trees and plants (silk trees and plants) that are fitted with “Nano-leaves” converting light and heat into electricity. this idea had great feedback from the Arabian peninsula and Municipalities around the world, although everything for the project is in place attracting money can become a nightmare and still is a nightmare. We hope to bring our first trees and plants to market by the end of 2009 and from there on it should be a peace of cake, as it is a aesthetic solution to all those visual and noise polluting alternatives.
    We have learned one thing during this period and that is: “Don’t be fooled by nice slogans and clean website designs, don’t be afraid of smart talking VC specialist, they are in for the money just as you are”.
    Go were the money is UAE, that what we did, and now we have a steady supply money that helps us to create a green environment, real trees, real energy, the main thing is not to give in.
    Alex van der Beek (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

    Reply
  • Dina Mathiasen 06/18/08 4:05 PM

    Dear Alex,
    I am with Innovation Center Denmark, and in April this year the Nordic countries and Estonia got together and created the Nordic Green ´08 conference, and we would love Latvian companies to join us in our effort to increase the visibility of Nordic clean technologies in the US. So please join our forum and feel free to add a discussion where you describe your product and experience, thereby increasing the visibility of your technology.

    We are very interested in new sources of renewable electricity, so please feel free to contact us at (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address), if you are in Silicon Valley.

    Reply

Cleantech Investing

Rob Day is a Boston-based cleantech venture capital investor and entrepreneur, and is also the President of the Renewable Energy Business Network (REBN). The views expressed on this blog are those of Rob and his friends and colleagues, not necessarily the views of REBN or Greentech Media or any other group. Contact Rob Day at: (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

.