Recent Posts:

ACS, ClearEdge, and XPV Capital

Rob Day: February 7, 2006, 10:32 PM
  • ACS Ltd., which manufactures emissions control equipment for use with vehicles such as RVs and tractors, as well as gensets, announced an undisclosed amount of funding from VenGrowth. The financing was led by VenGrowth's Mezzanine Finance Team and included investments by The VenGrowth Traditional Industries Fund Inc. and The VenGrowth III Investment Fund Inc.
  • Applied Materials' venture group (Applied Ventures) announced a $2M investment in ClearEdge Power, a silicon-based fuel cell startup in Oregon. As part of the transaction, Applied Materials has formed a strategic partnership with ClearEdge.
  • Canada's XPV Capital has announced to their LPs that they are forming a new $50M fund to focus exclusively on early-stage cleantech venture investments. The fund will specifically target investments in air treatment, water treatment, and enabling technologies in clean energy.

A123 raises $30M third round

Rob Day: February 6, 2006, 5:58 PM
Lithium-ion battery developer A123 announced today the closing of a $30M third round of financing. GE, Alliance Capital Management and FA Technology Ventures led the round, and existing investors Motorola, Qualcomm, North Bridge Venture Partners, Sequoia Capital, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, OnPoint, YankeeTek and Desh Deshpande also participated.

To date, the company has raised $62M. We mentioned their technology and progress back in November...

Notes from Palm Springs

Rob Day: February 4, 2006, 10:16 AM
If there was any lingering doubt that the cleantech investment space is hot these days, attending this week's Cleantech Investors Summit event in Palm Springs dispelled it. There were well over 200 attendees for this event, and I'm guessing that the upcoming Cleantech Venture Forum in San Francisco will have even more buzz, given its track record...

Some quick thoughts and reactions coming out of the event:

• Ever wonder if there really is a "herd mentality" amongst VCs? Then you should have seen the flight down from SFO to Palm Springs on Wednesday morning. If the plane had somehow flown into a hillside, half of our industry would have been wiped out in one fell swoop. Imagine several dozen i-bankers and VCs, all wearing the industry standard "business casual plus a coat" uniform, all queueing up to get on the same flight, blackberries in hand. And of course, once the plane landed, all headed directly for the Hertz counter -- no carpooling, of course. Yours truly was no exception on any of the above, admittedly. And the flight back on Thursday was exactly the same. On the plus side, it was good to see everyone, both at the conference and on the flights!

• Overheard between two i-bankers on the flight down: "Yeah, we have a PIPE deal going on now in this space, and it really seems to be getting hot, so we thought we'd come down and check it out. Hey, as long as there're deals happening, got to strike while it's hot, right??"

• One of the more interesting speeches, among several interesting talks and presentations, was Don Paul's. As the CTO of Chevron, Don was able to speak to several interesting questions -- where is Chevron putting their R&D and investment efforts, how do they expect to bring new technologies to market, and have we reached "peak oil"? Some notable statements (as always, I'm not a reporter, so these are directionally correct but not 100% accurate):
The fact is, there's a finite supply of oil available. We can argue about when the production peak is... Some argue that we're at the peak now, on the other end of the spectrum you have Exxon Mobil saying it's probably 30 years away. I tend to come down in the middle somewhere, thinking that it's 20 years or so... One implication is that the future of energy is about diversification of energy sources, we're going to need every molecule and electron we can find.

How are these technologies brought to market? Start with someone's good idea, and someone invests some money in developing it. Then it comes time to build a pilot plant, spend $5-10M to build a plant that can produce one barrel per day. But then you want to build a world-scale plant? That will take billions of dollars. We're missing that intermediate step. That's one reason I'm a big proponent of a distributed system with smaller, precision-manufacturing plants closer to end markets. However, because of economies of scale, we still need to aggregate capital, and expertise in manufacturing to six-nines quality levels is also difficult to find.
• One impression from the corporate panel is that large companies appear to be moving back into making direct strategic investments in emerging technology companies (or alternatively, in venture firms with a similar strategic fit), after a bit of a period of retrenchment. As one panelist pointed out, while VCs get a lot of attention for their investments, it's very often the large corporations that end up bringing these technologies to broad market acceptance.

• Heard some pretty clearly expressed ambivalence among dedicated cleantech VCs about all the new attention being paid to the space. On the one hand, those I spoke with clearly welcomed strong cross-segment technology contacts and expertise (especially valuable when the clean technology in question is a cross-over with other technologies), as well as the presence of co-investors with deep pockets. On the other hand, some worried that the space could get too crowded... Interestingly, some of the more broad-based investors also mentioned concern about the rise of cleantech-focused funds:
"The fact that LPs and institutions are now specifically targeting cleantech helps the industry develop quickly... But it's also a challenge -- am I going to pay a 200% markup because I'm up against some new cleantech-focused fund in the market?"
(For myself, I tend to think that cleantech remains a long way from being overcapitalized relative to the huge markets and unmet needs, and thus am in the "welcoming all co-investors with open arms" camp.)

• As always, despite this being a "cleantech" event, panelists' and attendees' interests were clearly focused on energy technology. Also clear was the increased blurring between clean energy and other energy techs, mostly as mainstream energy investors have accepted alternative energy technologies as also fitting into their mandate: "We have invested in many major hydrocarbon sources, most of the major coal basins, in midstream production, etc. With cleantech, we see it as part of that effort."

• Matt Simmons, author of "Twilight in the Desert," is a really smart guy who gives a very entertaining and highly educational presentation about the timing of peak oil, and its implications for our economy. But I couldn't help thinking about "Expert Political Judgment" while he was talking, as visions of foxes and hedgehogs ran through my head...

All in all, it was a very worthwhile event (although I unfortunately had to miss major portions due to other work needs, and to catch that last direct flight), and it will be great to see everyone again at the Cleantech Venture Forum in a few weeks!

Let’s talk peak oil and politics…

Rob Day: February 4, 2006, 8:50 AM
We're going to break an unwritten rule around here and mention a couple of highly contentious topics, "peak oil" and politics. Why are these topics generally off-limits on this site? Because while these are important topics for cleantech investors to keep in mind, they're covered very well by a lot of more knowledgeable authors elsewhere, and this site has always sought a "big tent" approach to the topic of cleantech investing -- it's a compelling investment area regardless of your political persuasions.

That having been said, this week saw these issues thrust front and center for cleantech investors, thanks to the State of the Union address ("America is addicted to oil"), the Cleantech Investors Summit (a broader post on the event is coming soon) where "peak oil" was a highlighted topic, and other media coverage that came out this week involving prominent investors. So let's take a look at a few such stories of note this week:
  • The President's now-famous line that America is addicted to oil, and his pledge to "replace 75% of our oil imports from the Middle East by 2025," certainly seems to have gotten a lot of attention (thanks in part to that line having been purposefully leaked earlier in the day, priming the media to grab onto it). At the event this week in Palm Springs, a common refrain was investors joking (?) about making big bets on ethanol now. But let's keep everything in perspective. A 22% increase in Federal spending on energy technologies is helpful, but is not going to make a huge near-term difference for many cleantech markets. And goals to be achieved in 20 years don't often lead to 3-7 year investment window impacts, such as many VCs care about. But on the other hand, it's a very important statement to hear the President make publicly, it is a strong signal of government policy direction going forward. And it will encourage the trend of large companies starting to act, regardless of current government policy, to get ahead of climate change issues. All of the above is why cleantech investor and entrepreneur reaction seems to have been pretty mixed. Readers of this site are invited to provide their own thoughts and comments...
  • The "peak oil" hypothesis has also gotten a lot of attention lately in the cleantech investor community and elsewhere. For those not familiar with the idea, "peak oil" is the theory that global oil production has, or soon will, reach its maximum levels, due to its finite supply (note: this doesn't say oil won't be available, just that it will be higher cost due to limited availability). As the CTO of Chevron, Don Paul, puts it: "Our economy is based around the idea that capital is expensive and energy is cheap. What happens when that gets switched?" The important thing for cleantech investors to take away is that, with some continued pushback, the concept appears to have been broadly accepted now, and the key question is no longer "if" but "when". Are we at peak oil now? Or will it be 20 or 30 years from now? And is it right to focus on peak oil, or should we also be thinking about "peak natural gas" and "peak coal", and what timings should we be considering for those? Even though venture investors tend to think about things in 3-7 year time windows, these are important questions to think about. Those looking for more information should check out the Energy Blog and Peak Oil News, as well as a number of books on the topic, such as Matt Simmons' "Twilight in the Desert". Readers of this site are also invited to discuss this topic, leave your comments below...
Okay, enough on those topics.

Getting back to topics more central to this site, it was interesting to note this Q&A with SunPower's Tom Werner (note the mention that he expects SunPower's silicon-based technology to achieve price parity with fossil fuels within 5-10 years), and given all the attention being paid to energy topics these days, it was also great to see this discussion of clean water technology -- its sometimes easy to forget, given all the hullabaloo, that cleantech investors care about clean water, clean manufacturing, advanced materials, and other investment areas that will be advantaged by emerging natural resource trends, not just energy generation technology.

[2/4 update: Big news, re: Tom Werner's Q&A from above, about Shell Solar selling off its silicon-based solar PV business this week. Note that they're holding onto their thin-film business...]
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3