• Tuesday, September 1, 2009 Latest Update: 9:00AM

Greentech Solar

Xunlight 26 Solar Aims for CdTe on Plastic

The one-year-old Ohio startup is developing a flexible cadmium-telluride thin film that isn’t like First Solar’s, and plans to go into pilot production next year.

A year ago, Xunlight 26 Solar embarked on a two-year plan to develop a production-ready solar panel of cadmium-telluride encased by plastic.

The startup, which is licensing technology from the nearby University of Toledo in Ohio, has been able to fabricate a cell that could convert 10.5 percent of the sunlight that strikes it into electricity, said Al Compaan, Xunlight 26 chief technology officer and an emeritus professor at the university.

That efficiency is lower than what the leader of cadmium-telluride thin films, First Solar (NSDQ: FSLR), could produce. Tempe, Ariz.-based First Solar's panels fetch an average of 10.9 percent efficiency, which means the cells assembled into the panels should have even higher conversion rate.

Of course, First Solar in its present incarnation has been around for a decade, so it's had time and resources to improve its technology.

But Xunlight 26 isn't just chasing after First Solar.

In fact, Xunlight 26 is tackling a different set of challenges than many startups developing cadmium-telluride thin films. Its competitors mostly work on sandwiching the semiconductor compound between two pieces of glass, much like what First Solar is doing.

The startup wants to replace glass with polyimide, and use what's called a roll-to-roll process to produce the thin films, Compaan said. The roll-to-roll process is akin to the process used by United Solar Ovonic and Nanosolar.

United Solar Ovonic makes thin films with layers of amorphous silicon while Nanosolar uses a mix of copper, indium, gallium and selenium.

"We take a material proven successful mainly by First Solar, and we are trying to eliminate glass so that it's light weight and flexible," Compaan said. "That will open up new markets for cadmium telluride panels."

The more pliable thin films could be less obtrusive and fit in space that can't accommodate glass panels.

Boosting the cell efficiency is a priority for Xunlight 26. The company also needs to show that plastic is a suitable substitute that can withstand different weather conditions and other environmental issues.

"Efficiencies on glass are higher than on polyimide now, but we see no fundamental reason why they couldn't be equivalent," Compaan said.

By the way, the numbers "2" and "6" in the company's name refer to the II-VI semiconductor family in which cadmium and tellurium belong.

Xunlight 26 has received undisclosed seed money from Xunlight Corp. and about $1 million from the state of Ohio. The two companies share an office in Toledo.

Xunlight Corp., founded in 2006 as a spinoff of the University of Toledo, is developing thin films with layers of amorphous silicon, amorphous silicon germanium and nanocrystalline silicon. The company also is using the roll-to-roll manufacturing process.

Xunlight 26 plans to complete developing a prototype panel, which would measure 1 foot by 3 feet, in 12 months, Compaan said. The company will then build a pilot production line.

Many companies in recent years have jumped into the business of developing cadmium-telluride solar panels.

The trend emerged partly because silicon, which is the key ingredient for most of the solar panels made today, became so expensive and in short supply a few years back that entrepreneurs began to look for alternative materials or at least figure out ways to use less silicon.

The rise of First Solar coincided with this period of silicon shortage and high pricing. The company also succeeded in scaling up its production and marketing its products. It's now one of the top five solar panel producers in the world and claims a low manufacturing cost of $0.87 per watt.

Cadmium-telluride startups hope to replicate First Solar's success. The area around Toledo is home to not only Xunlight 26 but also a few other new comers.

Willard & Kelsey Solar Group (WK Solar), founded in 2007, has set up a small factory in Perrysburg, which is near Toledo and is also home to First Solar's factory. WK Solar's management included former employees of First Solar and Glasstech. Harold McMaster started Glasstech in 1971 and then a solar company in the 1984 that would evolve to become First Solar (see When First Solar Wasn't So Hot).

WK Solar recently received approval for a $10 million loan from Ohio to expand its factory. It appeared to have started trial production earlier this year.

Other cadmium-telluride players in the Toledo area include Calyxo USA, the American subsidiary for the Germany company largely owned by Q-Cells.

Solargystics, which doesn't offer much on its website, also is part of the cadmium-telluride club.

Comments [3]

  • ECD Fan 09/1/09 11:24 AM

    A cell is not a panel (the panel has lower efficiency than a cell).  First Solar’s panel-level efficiency is actually 11.1% (FS-280).  Xunlight 26 better make sure the long-term degradation of their product does not exceed First Solar’s.  Solar on plastic (or flexible steel) is generally a bad idea, unless, of course, someone can make it for 60-80c a Watt.  The reason is degradation, and, yes, lower efficiency and yield (at least with the current “technologies”).  And why does one need flexible solar?  One can put PV on curved roofs easily (there are many examples).  Or is someone planning to put PV on tents?

    Reply
      • Rollin 09/5/09 10:55 PM

        There may indeed be a market for EVs to use a flexible solar umbrella like collector for recharging while at work for dayshift workers it could then be stowed entirely hidden for driving.

  • red2erni 09/3/09 5:10 PM

    Flex and R2R gets mixed up in these discussions because of the perception of low cost and continuous processing which folks think is low cost. Ask yourself why semiconsuctors are not made on plastic? The fact is that the very best solar cells are single crystal and made by epitaxy. They are north of 40% efficient but only used for space, etc. Next are single crystal silicon which is pushing up to mid 20s efficiency, then polycrystaline and then amorphous, with the so called micro-crystalline or micro-morph silicon in between. So crystalline quality, be it the CdS crystals and CdTe crystals in the First solar films or CIGS crystals. Polyimide will process at higher temperatures than lower cost plastics such as PEN and PET, but it is expensive and in short supply, But the higher temperature to get high quality polycrystalline films, ~ 450 to 525 deg. C,  just isn’t there. Defects are also a fact of life with polymer web, different universe from high quality glass. But more important is the encapsulation. No polymer film known will stand up to the temperature or will pass MOCON which itself is about a factor of a thousand poor of the water moisture permeation necessary for the PV panel/cell in the out of doors even for a few years, let alone 25 or 30 years.  If some one had such a cost effective thin film passivation, say even E-5 gr.H20/day-Meter, it would be worth that piece of 25-35$/Meter sq. low iron glass AND the lamination around the outside is required. But what do you expect from Professors, even brilliant ones such as these who have made so much contribution the stuff in the middle.

    Reply
.