Wells Fargo Plans for $100M Solar Financing

The bank has agreed to bankroll commercial projects to be built and operated by SunPower. Two projects already are underway in California. 

Wells Fargo has agreed to finance up to $100 million of solar energy projects to be built and maintained by SunPower.

The deal, announced Monday, would fund projects for businesses, universities or government agencies in the United States, SunPower said. It also came at a time when project financing is still hard to come by, though solar companies are hoping to see an improvement in the second half of this year.

As the investor, Wells Fargo would own the systems while San Jose, Calif.-based SunPower would design, build and operate them. Customers would sign long-term power purchase agreements with SunPower to pay for using solar electricity.

The investment would entitle the bank to get a 30 percent federal tax credit, or it could opt to receive the equivalent in grants from the U.S. Department of Treasury. Wells Fargo declined to say which option it would choose.

Congress made it possible to get grants instead of the tax credit in the stimulus package it approved in February this year. Lawmakers wanted to spur solar energy development, which had largely been stalled because of the credit crunch.

The grants are meant to allow project developers quicker access to financing. But the treasury department has yet to publish the rules and application form for the program, prompting complaints from project developers (see Solar Companies Fear Delays as Feds Work Slow Magic). It's expected to post the rules next month.

SunPower already is carrying out two projects that are being financed by this Wells Fargo fund. It's building a 1.1-megawatt system for the University of California at Merced and a 1-megawatt system for the Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Authority. SunPower plan to complete both projects by the end of this year.

Power purchase agreements have become a popular way for businesses and governments to get the cost and publicity benefits of using solar electricity without having to fork over the expensive upfront costs of installing and owning them. A 1-megawatt system, in general, could cost roughly $7 million to install. SunPower said it pioneered the PPA approach. UPDATE: Gordon Johnson, head of alternative energy research at Hapoalim Securities, said in a note Tuesday that the Wells Fargo financing could support 25 megawatts of projects -- this seems to reflect the declining costs of materials that has taken place since the credit crunch hit last fall. 

The PPA model also has migrated to the residential solar market. San Francisco-based SunRun, for example, offers PPAs through installers.

SolarCity, an installer, offers a lease program to both residential customers. The Foster City, Calif.-based company has announced two funds so far this year to finance both residential and commercial projects.

The last time SunPower announced a financing fund was back in January 2008, when GE agreed to back five projects in California totaling 8 megawatts. The companies didn't disclose the amount for the fund.

Wells Fargo has been an active investor in solar projects since 2006, said company spokeswoman Stephanie Rico. It has bankrolled projects carried out by MMA Renewables and SunEdison.

Image of a SunPower installation in Florida via SunPower.


Join experts and influencers at Greentech Media's Growth Opportunities in the New PV Market: Projects, Finance and Policy in San Francisco on July 13.

6 Comments

  • Steve Pluvia 06/29/09 10:05 PM

    “A 1-megawatt system would cost roughly $7 million to install.”  Hmmmm 2x the price it cost FSLR to install the same size system?

    Reply
      • Ucilia Wang 06/30/09 10:20 AM

        That figure is a general number, and costs could vary as you know. I just added a research note from Gordon Johnson at Hapoalim this morning saying that the $100M could support 25MW.

  • tom gray 06/30/09 6:00 AM

    Doesn’t anyone realize that at $7 million per megawatt (rated power) a solar plant (with an estimated lifespan of 20 years) would cost $7 billion per rated gigawatt, or almost $17 billion per actual gigawatt, which would then need to be rebuilt two more times to equal a nuclear plant ($5 billon per actual gigawatt) , or cost $51 billion to equal a nuclear plans gross output, plus billions more due to its inability to meet peak demand and thus require back up, etc. Solar costs 10 times more to build than nuclear , yet results in an unreliable/uncontrollable power source. Why is anyone stupid enough to buy into solar power? I can understand California doing so - they are brainless dolts about everything.

    Reply
  • Geoffrey Kinsey 06/30/09 1:56 PM

    The SunPower systems will deliver substantially more energy per rated watt of power, so will likely be cheaper than a FSLR system over the life of the system ($/kW-hr). For example, the larger area of low-efficiency panels makes cleaning and other O&M a larger factor in long-term energy costs.

    Reply
  • Geoffrey Kinsey 06/30/09 2:02 PM

    The two Westinghouse AP1000s being planned for Florida are going for $17 billion for just over 2 GW installed. The taxpayers pay for decommissioning and waste disposal & security at a rate that has as yet defied calculation. Cheap?

    http://www.greencarcongress.com/2009/01/progress-energy.html

    Reply
  • Rickie 07/2/09 3:16 AM

    According to the professional solar price website, http://www.pvinsights.com, solar module price drop to US $1.7-$2.0 /Watt now. Solar system cost should be lower than US $4/Watt soon. According to PVinsight, solar system price should lower than US$3/Watt in2010. It means 1GWatt sola project with installation cost should take US $3.5 to s4 billion in 2010.

    Reply
.