• Thursday, March 6, 2008 Latest Update: 1:24PM

Greentech Media

(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) March 6, 2008 2 Comments

Think Global to Bring Electric Crossover to U.S.

After announcing a partnership with battery startup A123Systems and an investment from General Electric, the Norwegian electric-car company says it aims to bring a five-seat vehicle called Ox to the United States as early as late 2010.

Norwegian electric-car company Think Global plans to bring its five-seat crossover concept vehicle, called the Think Ox, to the U.S. market as early as 2010, said Don Cochrane, the company’s U.K. sales and marketing director.

The car, which will have a top speed of about 85 mph and will be able to drive for about 125 miles on one charge, has been designed specifically with the United States in mind, but will also be sold internationally, he said.

Cochrane added that the company also is considering adding a serial hybrid powertrain, which would pair the electric motor with an engine that uses fuel to give the vehicle unlimited range. A serial, or series, hybrid differs from hybrids on the streets today in that only the motor -- not the engine -- propels the vehicle.

The news comes on the heels of the concept car’s unveiling at the International Motor Show in Geneva on Wednesday. In a joint announcement the same day, General Electric (NYSE: GE) said it had invested $4 million in Think and $20 million in A123Systems, and Think said it had signed an agreement to buy batteries from lithium-ion manufacturer A123Systems.

To bring the car to market, Think will need additional investment partners and possibly a large auto manufacturer to help develop the vehicle’s platform, Cochrane said. Last week, Think Chairman Jan-Olaf Willums said the electric-car company would likely partner with a large automaker in order to build a bigger vehicle (see Think to Partner with Large Automaker).

Last month, A123 said it already had raised $40 million in its fourth round of funding, led by GE (see Seeking Alpha post). The funding brought GE’s total stake in the battery startup to $20 million, making GE the largest cash investor in A123, according to the announcement (also see Earth2Tech post and VentureBeat post).

A123 has had a relationship with GE since 2006, when the bigger company invested in the startup’s $30 million second round of private-equity funding (see VCs Charge Up Battery Firm). A123 had previously raised $32 million (see Battery Pumps Up Power Tools). GE also invested in the battery startup’s $30 million round last year (see In Brief: A123Systems Gets $30M Charge).

The deal between Think and A123 isn’t exactly unexpected, either.

In October, Willums told Greentech Media that Think was in the process of signing a development deal with A123Systems after its deal with Tesla Motors fell through (see Tesla Suspends Battery Business).

A123Systems -- which also is planning an IPO within the next year, according to the announcement -- isn’t Think’s only battery partner.

Last month, Think said it had signed a deal with Enova Systems (AMEX: ENA) to provide at least 1,000 power-control units for its small Think City electric cars this year (see Green Cars Cruise Forward). Think also has signed agreements with Indianapolis-based Enerdel and France-based Groupe Dassault to develop battery systems for its cars.

But the new deal -- along with the new funding -- could be another sign that the electric–car business is becoming more serious.

In February, Gartner analyst Thilo Koslowski said the stream of announcements of alternative-vehicle partnerships shows that companies are "heading in the right direction" because they are focusing on setting up supply and distribution chains -- an important step toward mass production and distribution. 

Comments [2]

  • Barry Bernsten 07/24/08 8:42 AM

    America needs to stay FOCUSED, AWARE and EDUCATED.

    History reminds us that every time oil prices peak and the North American market/consumers start to discuss alternative energy sources, the oil exporting countries start to trim down their prices. History also tells us that the oil exporting nations have been very successful in the past and in fact, we have lost our enthusiasm and dropped many of our alternative energy initiatives after oil prices are reduced.

    WE need to stay focused this time.

    1) Al Gore and his energy initiative is on course.
    2) T. Boone Pickens and his wind power initiative is on course.
    3) BG Automotive Group?s mass production electric vehicle program is on
      course.
    4) Richard Branson from the UK is on course.
    5) The Gas Reduction Act of 2008 might not be the most environmentally sound
        solution, but yet it shows that Congress has finally realized that we have an
        energy crisis (again), and a real threat to our national security.

    The continued dependence on foreign oil is a threat to our long term democratic values. We must become an energy independent nation, and with this, some sacrifices will have to be made by the American consumer.

    Be aware!!
    We are exporting approximately USD $700 Billion dollars per year of U.S. currency. The majority of this money is being transferred to the Trillion dollar ?sovereign wealth funds?. This is USD $700 Billion not being spent on America?s educational system, health care and security.

    The ?sovereign wealth funds? are directly buying major interests (large blocks of stock) in U.S. companies, including most of the major banks. Also, billions of dollars of ?sovereign wealth fund? money is being invested in our hedge funds, private equity firms, and the investment banking industry. A few of these firms are directly and indirectly investing large sums of money into our ?gas combustion? automobile industry. Do we want our auto industry in the direct or indirect control of the firms that are supplying us oil?  This is an interesting topic for an investigative reporter. 

    There are automotive consulting companies in Michigan (heart of our auto industry), lobbying States and our Federal Government, NOT to subsidize the Electric Vehicle industry. The latter seems to be contradictory to what the American public would like to see from our automobile industry. After the billions (excess of $20 billion) the automotive companies have lost in the past 6 months producing gas combustion vehicles, you would think they too would change course. Changing course is not adding 2-4 miles per gallon w/Hybrids. Drastic measures in our auto industry must take place and NOW!

    Do not let the temporary reduction in oil prices push us off course?.AGAIN.

    Read, Read, Read- Stay on top of the issues. Let?s not be fooled again.

    STAY FOCUSED, AWARE and EDUCATED! 

    Reply

Related Content

Most Popular

    Articles

  1. Will Solar Crash the Smart Grid?

    November 2, 2009

  2. LDK Solar Shares Dive as Q-Cells Demands Money Back

    November 2, 2009

  3. 2,300 People on Waiting List for Think City and 4,000 at Aptera

    November 2, 2009

  4. Silver Spring vs. Grid Net: Now vs. the Future

    November 3, 2009

    Discussions

  1. Solar Roundup: 6MW Solar Neighborhood, PG&E Buys 500MW

    October 26, 2009 7 Comments

  2. Energy Storage: What Is the Cheapest Solution?

    November 5, 2009 7 Comments

  3. Deforestation: Not So Bad for the Climate?

    November 4, 2009 6 Comments

  4. MIT, Storage, ‘Direct Solar’ Among DOE Research Grant Winners

    October 26, 2009 4 Comments

Copyright © 2009 Greentech Media, Inc. All rights reserved.

.