Tesla Suspends Battery-Pack Business

Electric sports-car startup says it is 'all hands on deck' to focus on shipping cars. Think Global, which had expected to buy battery packs from Tesla, says it is turning to partnerships with Enerdel, Groupe Dassault and A123Systems.

Tesla Motors is putting its battery business on hold for now to focus on producing its Roadsters, company officials said.

"Tesla Motors is doing a lot of different kinds of businesses, including the battery business, but today it's all hands on deck shipping cars," Martin Eberhard, president of technology and former CEO of Tesla Motors, told Greentech Media.

While the company is best known for its speedy sports car, the Roadster, it also had planned to sell battery packs to Think Global, a Norwegian electric-car company, for additional revenue.

Some analysts had said they liked the business model of selling batteries in addition to cars, anticipating that the car business might be farther away from mainstream-market volumes.

Now the deal seems to be off.

"Tesla said they would be happy to provide the battery, but in six months, perhaps, and we said we can't wait," said Think CEO Jan-Olaf Willums.

Willums said he first heard there might be delays in delivering the battery packs a few months ago. The news has affected Think "badly, obviously, so we are instead finding deals with other people," he said.

Think already has signed agreements with Indianapolis-based Enerdel and France-based Groupe Dassault to develop battery systems for Think's cars. The company also is in the process of signing a development deal with A123Systems, a battery startup in Watertown, Mass., he said.

All three suppliers are working on iron-phosphate versions of lithium-ion batteries for this deal, said Willums, who added that the technology that performs the best will be selected for a final contract.

With the three contracts, Think will have as many batteries as it expected to get from Tesla, he said, adding that, with the iron phosphate, "we think they will be safer than what Think has."

But Tesla is still a possible partner, he said. "We haven't decided whether we want to drop the Tesla [battery pack] or if we want to keep going and do it when they have time."

Think began producing cars in February and expects to make 500 cars this year, which it will sell to partners to get feedback. The company plans to ramp up to several thousand cars next year and 20,000 cars annually by 2009.

Willums said it isn't behind schedule yet, but that the timeline to expand production might change, depending on how the new battery packs perform in tests.

Think's new battery partners are scheduled to deliver batteries for testing in spring, and the length of the tests will depend on how the batteries perform, he said.

While he said he wishes Tesla had told Think earlier that it wouldn't be able to deliver the batteries on time, Willums said the move makes sense for Tesla.

Bringing the battery prototypes to the production phase would have cost the company a good bit of money, he said, and after announcing mass production of its Roadster would be delayed until 2008, it made sense for them to focus on the car.

"From their [business-strategy] point of view, I have a full understanding," he said. "From a contractual point of view, it's not so good, but we're all in the same boat and we were flexible enough to find some other partners."

Elon Musk, a Tesla investor and board member, said the company has not abandoned Think or the powertrain business at all.

"It is simply a question of focus being on the Roadster right now and, to a lesser extent, model 2 (codenamed White Star)," he said, referring to the four-door sedan expected to cost half of the $89,000 price tag of the Roadster when it comes out in 2008.

"The technical aspects of the battery are solved, but there is still a lot of work remaining to make battery production cost-efficient," he said. "There is no point in providing Think with an overly expensive battery."

Thilo Koslowski, a vice president and lead automotive analyst with Gartner, said Tesla is doing the right thing by focusing on getting the car right and out in a meaningful way.

"Tesla is a car manufacturer first of all, and that's the reason it achieved so much attention and interest," he said. "It's cool, it's seen as robust and it's got a good design."

It makes sense for the company to focus on the parts of its business that most differentiate the brand, he said.

"The battery is not something that will be a huge differentiation or that the company needs to focus on in-house," he said. "As in consumer products, the battery is not seen as something that makes the product distinct."

In the future, the company might decide to turn its attention back to batteries or partner with another company for the batteries, Koslowski said.

He pointed to Better Place, which raised $200 million for its plan to lease easily removable batteries for electric cars and set up battery-charging and replacing stations around the United States (See In Brief: New Choices At the Pump).

VantagePoint Venture Partners, which invested in Tesla, also invested in Better Place.

Mark Huang, a former senior vice president at GE Energy Financial Services, also said Tesla's core competency is car manufacturing.

"It's hard to do it all, the battery pack and the car," he said. "There is some significant engineering work that needs to be done for both."

Comments [6]

  • Kate Owen 11/1/07 9:58 AM

    So does this mean something could be delayed/wrong with with Tesla’s Roadster as well, given potential battery issues?

    Reply
  • Fake Name 11/1/07 11:15 AM

    KateO, from what I am hearing this is definitely NOT the only delay you are going to hear from Tesla.  The company has already admitted that it is having trouble moving to commercial scale, and the cancellation of the battery business is just another sign that they need to focus all their energies on just getting the cars out without further delay.

    Having spoken to several folks who have taken a test drive the verdict is that the performance is good, but the fine features need a little work.  They described the vehicle as “plasticy” and mentioned several small “fit and finish” items that weren’t quite right.

    Let’s face it, it’s hard to produce cars on any kind of a massive scale.  Look at all the recalls even major quality manufacturers like BMW, Mercedes or even Toyota and Honda have and they have been doing it for decades!  Then start to think about all the issues Tesla is going to have in trying to get out their first car…EVER.

    Don’t get me wrong, I am a big fan of electrics, and I think the Roadster looks like a beautiful vehicle, but I would never want to own the first one coming off the lot (or any one, until they have at least a few years of production under their belt, and at least a few thousand cars on the road).

    Reply
  • Kate Owen 11/5/07 7:03 AM

    Definitely. So I also saw Tesla on the top 10 startup list on this website. Do you guys think they’re good enough (or promising enough) to be on the list? I’m not sure, really.

    Reply
  • Kyle Wang 11/3/07 11:16 PM

    Small EV makers like Tesla and Th!nk have underestimated how difficult, also how different the job of making a great power battery pack is from making (assembling) the car.  To manage these advanced electric-chemical properties in the battery and thoroughly integrate them with vehicles for performance, safety, extended battery life thro its entire life span, sophisticated thermal management, power regulation and communication protocols between vehicle and batteries are not easy tasks for small EV makers of any kind anywhere today.  It’s best to leave this to the high end system integrators who understand battery as well as vehicles.  They are extremely few; but do exist. Look up Delaware Power Systems in Canada.  For Tesla to develop an ideal battery system for others (including their own), without heavy investments and long R&D lead time, it’s wishful. 

    Reply
  • Kate Owen 11/5/07 7:02 AM

    Thanks, led1, I tend to agree. I’m rooting for them as well, but their challenges are pretty huge. I wonder how long it will be before the Chinese replicate the Tesla Roadster and pass the “close the door flush” test on their version of the body/frame… wink

    Reply
  • Eric Wesoff 11/15/07 12:22 PM

    As an analyst here at Greentech Media, I had some input into our Top 10 and I wanted to share my thinking on Tesla’s inclusion on our list.  When we built the list - Tesla was pledging initial deliveries in the fall and was building what looked like a strong OEM battery business.  Our thinking was to include them on the list until they failed on their delivery promise.

    Since then, Tesla has delayed their deliveries and withdrawn their battery business.

    I would like to see a start-up succeed in the electric car business but overpromising and underdelivering is not a good marketing strategy.  So, unless there is a recovery in their delivery performance, we will probably remove them from our Top 10 list in the next go-round. 

    Reply
.