Tendril Expands Its Reach in Smart Homes

The company, which develops hardware and software for controlling energy consumption in the home, is moving into your living room with a raft of new deals.

Tendril Networks is creeping in everywhere.

The Boulder, Colorado-based company – which makes Zigbee-based hardware and software for curbing energy consumption – now has signed deals with 29 utilities to test and/or deploy its technology (see In Smart Metering, Watch Out for Tendril). At the end of July, it had 20 deals. Thus, it's seen nearly a 50 percent increase in deals in about four months.

"We are getting a new utility sign up every 10 days or so at this point," CEO Adrian Tuck wrote in an email.

Most of the companies at this point are only testing the equipment in their labs. Nonetheless, one of them will begin a commercial rollout in 2009, according to Tuck. By the end of next year, the utility will be wiring about 5,000 to 10,000 new homes a month.

Ten other customers, meanwhile, will kick off field trials in 2009 involving 100 to 10,000 customers each.

Automated energy management has emerged as one of the fastest growing sectors in greentech. In the third quarter, VCs put more money into energy efficiency and smart grid ($272 million) than in biofuels ($150 million), a reversal in the usual rankings.

Why? Utilities are emphatic that energy efficiency, rather than solar or clean energy production, is their highest priority. Many of the devices for throttling back power to air conditioners, lights and other software also revolve around digital hardware and software, familiar technologies to venture capitalists. And, unlike solar companies, smart grid outfits, for the most part, won't need $200 million to build factories just to get rolling.

Tendril's utility deals are an important metric because power companies will likely play a key role over the next severa l years in determining who makes it and who doesn't. In most cases, the utility will pay the bill and install the equipment. Most people can barely program their digital thermostats and they aren't going to rush out to Home Depot to replace them with demand-response devices. Comverge and EnerNoc, the early leaders in the field, did so through relationships with utilities.

Tendril's equipment is tuned to work with the most popular standard protocols, such as Zigbee. (Tuck actually worked on the low-power wireless standard.). It has also done quite a bit of work on its software interfaces. Tendril's Insight provides homeowners with a visual tally of how much electricity they are paying at any given moment.

When the rate goes higher, the thermostat flashes red. The Insight also provides data on how much power you are consuming compared to similarly situated neighbors. Thermostat and power consumption settings can all be set from a PC. Granted, many other companies such as Threshold and Agilewaves tout similar features, but Tendril has assembled it in a fairly smooth fashion.

Almost every appliance in the house can thrive on less electricity, according to Tuck. Garage freezers, for instance, can be put on a five-minutes-on/five-minutes-off rotation without risking a bout of botulism or freezer burn.

The company charges around $1 per month per consumer to the utility. The actual hardware costs an additional fee, but you can plug in non-Tendril hardware into the system. Consumers can save around $100 a year Tendril has estimated.

Still, victory is far from assured. Although it arguably is the incumbent, Zigbee is far from perfect and could be displaced. Some companies, such as GainSpan, have proposed using low-powered WiFi rather than Zigbee (see Get Ready for the WiFi Thermostat and An Old Favorite – WiFi – Preps to Disrupt Smart Meter Market). GainSpan has also begun to work with GridNet, which wants to connect homes to utilities via WiMax (see The Next Smart Grid Technology: WiMax). Other companies like Sequentric Energy Systems have low-cost systems based on other protocols.

Still other companies, like Greenbox Technology, are avoiding the hardware-software strategy of Tendril and just concentrating on software. And others, such as Trilliant, have signed big deals with companies like HydroOne. 

Comments [3]

  • Tom Schulz 11/24/08 5:54 AM

    A customer can save $100 per year? How many people go through the hassle to research thermostats and get this one installed?

    The company gets $1/user per month? Given the manufacturing costs for the device ($30-150?), the sales & distribution costs, warranty, customer service etc. etc…. how long will it take to burn through the VC money ?

    Any residential monthly service including a device costs $30-150 per month (phone, cell phone, dish, cable TV, Internet) and it’s tough enough to make money in these markets…

    Reply
  • W Lez 11/24/08 7:32 AM

    Youre comparing Tendril to GainSpan to Sequentric to Greenbox to Trilliant?? Trilliant along with other AMI vendors is like the utility equivalent of DSL or cable internet. Comparing Greenbox to Trilliant is like comparing YouTube to Verizon.

    Reply
  • Daniel Moneta 11/24/08 10:13 PM

    To here-now, as the article states, most of these devices will be provided by the utilities to consumers in large quantities, not sold directly. The utility is the biggest benefactor here. You may save $100 on energy, but if they save $100 * 1,000,000 homes, we’re talking serious money.

    To wirelez, I don’t think they’re comparing them, I think they’re just talking about all the players in the industry. And Greenbox has a nice piece of software that could easily become an important part of any number of providers’ overall solutions. I think there’s a lot more cooperation amongst “competitors” in this market helping to see the ZigBee standard succeed.

    Also, with regards to WiFi. Yes, some vendors have developed Wifi solutions. The problem is this: With ZigBee, there is the “Smart Energy” protocol. This specifies how a smart meter talks to a thermostat, in home display, switch, pump, etc, and vice versa - regardless of brand or implementation. There is as of yet no common standard for wifi. So while each company is free to make a proprietary wifi based system and even work with others, you don’t have the same kind of flexibility in choosing devices from amongst a number of vendors that will all work together.

    Reply
.