• Wednesday, June 17, 2009 Latest Update: 12:00PM

Greentech Solar

Solar Millennium Lands 726MW Contract With SoCal Edison

The German solar-thermal power plant developer has a deal with Southern California Edison to supply up to 726 megawatts of power from two plants in California's desert, and possibly a third.

Germany's Solar Millennium has landed a deal to build two $1 billion-plus solar-thermal power plants in the California desert to supply Southern California Edison's thirst for renewable power.

The deal announced Wednesday calls for the German company to supply up to 726 megawatts of power to the California utility.

Solar Millennium plans to build two 242-megawatt parabolic trough plants in Blythe, Calif. and Ridgecrest, Calif., and possibly a third plant in the future.

The company said it expects to begin construction on the plants next year and start producing power from them by 2013 or 2014, pending regulatory approval.

The plants are to be built on federally owned land, which could slow the projects, since the Bureau of Land Management is facing a huge backlog of applications for solar projects on land it manages in the American southwest (see Pros and Cons of Putting Solar Thermal on Private Land).

The same challenge is facing BrightSource Energy, which plans to build 2.6 gigawatts of solar power plants to deliver electricity to Pacific Gas and Electric and Southern California Edison.

While it has applications before BLM to build on federal land in California's Mojave Desert, it is also planning to build a plant on private land in Nevada (see BrightSource Locks Up Nevada Land for Solar Thermal Power).

Solar Millennium hasn't yet built a commercial-scale solar-thermal plant in the United States, though it is has built and is building more projects in southern Spain that are smaller but similar to those it plans for the Southern California Edison deal.

It has also demonstrated its parabolic trough technology in a test with an existing parabolic trough solar thermal power plant in California, which the company said yielded a 10-percent performance improvement on power production.

Parabolic trough technology – parabolic mirrors that focus the sun's heat on pipes that carry the heated fluid to a turbine for generating power – competes with rival solar-thermal technologies such as the heliostat design used by BrightSource, in which fields of flat mirrors focus sunlight onto a tower (see Solar Thermal: Which Technology is Best?)

California utilities are interested in trying out multiple solar technologies, given that they are subject to a Renewable Portfolio Standard mandate to provide 20 percent of their power from renewable sources by the end of the decade (see Solar Thermal vs. PV: Which Tech Will Utilities Favor?)

Of course, Solar Millennium will need to raise the money to build the projects. The company said it would seek to take advantage of the provision in the stimulus package passed in February that allows solar companies to claim a direct payment in lieu of a 30 percent tax credit for investors in solar projects (see Obama Signs Stimulus Package).

That provision only applies to projects begun before the end of 2010, giving the company a deadline to work towards. 


Join experts and influencers at Greentech Media's Growth Opportunities in the New PV Market: Projects, Finance and Policy in San Francisco on July 13.

Comments [4]

  • ken beauhrt 06/17/09 4:06 PM

    Massive subsidies for pretty crappy ways to produce electricity. I note that no cost figures are ever reported by the alternative energy media. Another insytance of conspiraing to mislead the public as to the total cost of these projects. Let’s look at th numbers, something Greentechmedia is obviously avoiding. At $1 billion per plant, rated at 242 MW, we find the true cost of production by noting that we will need at least 10 of these plants to average 1 gigawatt, somewhat less than the output of a single typical 1100 MW nuclear plant.
    So the cost of building a Solar Milennium plant capable of averaging 1 gigawatt is $10 billion. The Chinese are building nuclear plants at a rate of 1 every two months, at less than $2 billion (size: 1100 MWs). Those solar thermal plants will only last 20 years. The nuclear plant for 60 years. Thus it will require $30 billion be spent on solar thermal to equal the $2 billion spent on Chinese nuclear. The Chinese are producing power
    at a cost 15 times cheaper than we can using solar thermal. We also can build nucelar, not as cheap as the Chinese, at $5 per gigawatt. But that’s still 6 times cheaper than solar thermal. Alternative energy is a path to lower standard of living and even less ability to compete. Solar energy is a brainless method of producing carbon free power. I notice that only those bankrupt folks in California think its a “good idea.”  And the cost of
    solar thermal ain’t gonna come down in the future. That can’t happen, or at least not enough to make any difference. But you ain’t gonna learn anything about all this reading alternative energy cheerleading news
    sites. They’re in the pocket of the commercial solar industry. Just look at all their ad revenue and where it comes from.

    Reply
      • Andrew Armstrong 09/21/09 7:35 PM

        You seem to have left one fairly major point out of your reasonings - the environment!!! Oh, that’s right. That was the reason behind alternative energy in the first place

  • jeff 10/29/09 2:25 AM

    nice post eric, to borrow one of ken’s more frequently used comments (with a slight twist) -  “ken beauhrt has a scent of fraud about him”

    Reply
.