Sandia Joins Race for Mini-Reactors

The famed national lab says it is almost done designing a mini-nuke that can be shipped overseas.

The mini-nuclear movement is getting friends in high places.

Sandia National Laboratories said it has designed a small nuclear reactor and is looking for partners to commercialize it and even sell it overseas. The reactor could provide 100 to 300 megawatts worth of heat. More importantly, the factory-built reactor could be completed in two years, far less than the seven years or more that large (3,000 megawatts), conventional reactors take.

Roughly 85 percent of the design is complete. The cost of the reactor could drop to $250 million once in production.

Mini-reactors have traveled from being a fringe topic in the energy world to one that is now being discussed by utilities as a possible future energy source. The Sandia announcement brings more heft to the topic because of the reputation and expertise of the labs. Although nuclear contractor Babcock & Wilcox said earlier this year that it will make mini-nukes, most of the companies in this market so far are startups. Since utilities are even skittish about working with start-ups on solar projects, the prospect facing the young nukes is a daunting one. In all likelihood, a number of companies will seek an alliance with Sandia.

Sandia's reactor, meanwhile, incorporates some of the more attractive features of the other reactors. The small uranium core will be passively cooled by being sealed in a submerged tank of liquid sodium to cool it. Getting rid of cooling pumps and other equipment reduces the potential for accidents.

The reactor will also hold enough fuel so that it can be sealed for decades, thereby reducing the waste and opportunities for proliferation. As a result, it can also be exported more easily.

Mini-reactors work like standard nuclear reactors: the heat from a radioactive core turns water into steam and the steam cranks a turbine. The advantage is that the mini-reactors are safer and easier to construct because of their smaller size, say proponents. The price of electricity would cost 6 to 9 cents a kilowatt.

"The claim is that the modules will deliver electricity at the same prices" as large nuclear plants, said Burton Richter, a Stanford professor of physical sciences and a Nobel laureate.

So who's in the market? Hyperion Power Generation was the first to publicly discuss its technology. The company, which licensed technology out of Los Alamos National Labs, wants to build hot tub-sized reactors that can generate about 27 megawatts of power and/or 72 megawatts of heat. The reactors are designed for outlying communities and naval bases, but could be assembled into arrays.

NuScale Power, meanwhile, has made presentations to utilities in the Pacific Northwest about its technology. The company wants to build 45-megawatt modular reactors and then assemble them in arrays to construct plants that can provide 1 gigawatt of power as well as heat. The reactor is passively cooled by a water-filled envelope. VC firm CMEA has invested in the company.

NuScale has a prototype reactor that relies on electricity (rather than nuclear fuel) to heat the water. NuScale currently is preparing its application for design certification. It won't likely submit it to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Agency until mid-2011 and it will take about three years for the agency to review it. (There are 104 commercial nuclear reactors that exist in the U.S.)

The first plant built from NuScale's modular reactors, therefore, may not go live until 2018.

Intellectual Ventures, meanwhile, the think tank-like company founded by former Microsoft scientist Nathan Myhrvold, has spin out a company called TerraPower that will develop nuclear reactors ranging in size from a few megawatts to a gigawatt. TerraPower says it can load its reactor with un-enriched fuel  and seal it up for 30 to 60 years. TerraPower wants to experiment with thorium instead of uranium.

Babcock & Wilcox, meanwhile, wants to build reactors in the Sandia-size range. The firm is one of the most prominent contractors in nuclear.

A few other companies, meanwhile, are touting fusion (Tri-Alpha Energy) and thorium reactors (Thorium Power.)

Comments [2]

  • Rod Adams 08/29/09 4:35 AM

    There is one other company that has been designing, discussing and writing about small reactors since its founding in September 1993 - Adams Atomic Engines, Inc. (http://www.atomicengines.com).

    We have had some setbacks as a result of being a few years ahead of the bleeding edge, and we are not currently in active development of any particular project, but our design for a closed cycle gas turbine that uses low pressure nitrogen as a coolant and working fluid remains a potential competitor in the market for reactors with power outputs ranging from 1-50 MWe. Our burn rate is well under control and we have no intention of leaving the space.
    Our biggest hurdle, other than the multi-year licensing effort with the NRC that requires the applicant to pay approximately $60-100 million in fees to the US government, is the fact that our preferred fuel suppliers are still producing just small quantities of fuel for their own prototype reactor uses (B&W in the US, PBMR in South Africa, and potentially Tsingua University and her partners in China.) Once they are in commercial production of high temperature fuel pebbles using TRISO coatings to contain fission products, we will probably ramp up our efforts and determine the best power rating for our initial product offering.

    Rod Adams
    Publisher, Atomic Insights
    Host and producer, The Atomic Show Podcast
    Founder, Adams Atomic Engines, Inc.

    Reply
  • Paul W. Gladieux 08/31/09 11:53 AM

    It’s clear that small reactor technology is the break-through needed by the commercial nuclear power industry.  It will succeed as long as top management fully understands that quality management is their responsibility and that quality starts on day one.  Don’t make the same mistakes of those in the ‘70s and ‘80s by “Bringing in Quality Later - When the Time is Right.”  The right time is day one of writing your startup Business Plan.  If your nuclear industry investors are not concerned about “Nuclear Quality Management” - then educate them after you understand its scope and magnitude.

    NUREG-1055 was mentioned many times during the December 2008 Vendor Workshop at NRC headquarters - it needs to be mandatory reading for everyone in or entering the U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Industry.  If you start with this document and make plans to prevent the same problems of the ‘70s / ‘80s, you stand a chance of success.

    Paul W. Gladieux
    Founder and CEO
    Global Quality Management Associates, Inc.
    http://www.gqmassociates.com Since 1991

    Reply
.