Report: U.S. Market Sees 50% Annual Growth

The hodgepodge of federal and state policies are favoring the growth of large-scale solar farms, which will help propel the U.S. closer to the No. 1 spot, says GTM Research.

Report: U.S. Market Sees 50% Annual Growth

Solar energy installations in the United States are poised to grow about 50 percent annually in the next three years as the country closes in on Germany, the largest solar market in the world.

The U.S. is likely to install 400 megawatts of new solar projects in 2009, and see the growth reach 1.5 gigawatts to 2 gigawatts of new installations in 2012, according to GTM Research's new report released Tuesday.

The strong demand represents over $6.1 billion in investments per year and the creation of 50,000 jobs, GTM Research said.

The report, The United States PV Market Through 2013: Project Economics, Policy, Demand and Strategy, analyzed the scope and financing of power projects by major developers such as Sempra Generation and Renewable Ventures. It also examined policies and demand of big solar states, and detailed the impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA).

"One of the big conclusions in our report is that the United States is really a ridiculous complex of state markets and utility markets, and each functions pretty much independently from the other, except for some relatively loose common threads," said Shayle Kann, an energy analyst at GTM and co-author of the report.

Like other hot solar markets in the world, government incentives are a big reason for fueling growth in the next few years. Last October, Congress extended a 30 percent investment tax credit for solar installations for eight years. The legislation gets rid of a $2,000 cap for residential installations and allows the utilities to take advantage of the tax credit.

Another booster shot is coming from the ARRA, which has created a host of grants, tax credits and loan guarantees for manufacturing solar energy equipment and installing it.

These federal subsidies, coupled with states' own incentives and mandates for renewable energy installations and consumption, will propel growth for residential and utility-scale projects, the report said. Projects developed to service utility customers will likely grow the fastest, from installing nearly 91 megawatts in 2009 to adding 466 megawatts in 2012, under a conservative estimate.

Twenty-nine states and the District of Columbia are requiring utilities to serve up an increasing amount of renewable electricity. Out of the 29 states, 16 of them (and D.C.) have specified the amount of solar electricity and/or distributed generation in the power mix, according to the renewable energy database DSIRE.

These state mandates have prompted utilities to sign renewable electricity power purchase agreements or start developing their own wind, solar and other renewable power plants.

California has the most aggressive goal, mandating 20 percent of renewable electricity by 2010 for its investor-owned utilities. The utilities aren't likely to meet that mandate by 2010, however (see Cal May Add 365MW in 2009, Still Short of 20% Mandate).

But half a dozen states are seeing rapid growth. GTM Research estimates that new installations in Arizona, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Nevada and Massachusetts will grow collectively from 54 megawatts in 2008 to 376 megawatts in 2012.

Increasingly, developers who are benefiting from these state policies are veterans of the power industry, not startup companies.

Sempra Generation, for example, belongs to Sempra Energy, which also owns the utility San Diego Gas & Electric. Sempra Generation developed a 10-megawatt solar farm next to its natural-gas power plant in Arizona and sold the resulting solar electricity to the Pacific Gas and Electric Co. starting in January this year (see PG&E to Get Solar Power For the First Time). PG&E has since agreed to buy power from another, 48-megawatt project from Sempra.

"You really have to have access to large financing channels, and Sempra is an example of that," Kann said. "The project development game is becoming more crowded quickly. Anybody who enters has to be very deliberate about how their strategies line up with the dynamics of the markets themselves."

Although a growing number of utilities are buying or developing their own solar farms, that doesn't mean they are less inclined to buy solar electricity from independent power producers, he added.

"Look at natural gas and coal, where utilities don't necessary have the capital to own every asset they get power from," he said. "You will see the same thing ultimately in solar."

Although many solar companies peg the U.S. as a reigning market one day, it remains to be seen when the country will reach that goal. Germany has become a bright spot in the otherwise gloomy market this year thanks to its generous solar incentives.

The country already has about 1.5 gigawatts of new solar projects from January through September this year, and it could add another 1 gigawatt or more by the end of the year, according to Germany's solar industry association.

Surpassing Germany might take more time than some company executives had foreseen earlier this year. For one thing, the ARRA so far hasn't given solar the boost that some had hoped for.

Although the ARRA spells out a myriad of incentives for solar, many of the programs also award money to projects for other types of renewable energy generation, electricity transmission, energy storage and even biofuels.

Competing for these federal dollars has proven difficult and more time consuming than some companies had anticipated. As a result, the Solar Energy Industries Association is now lobbying for a new legislation that would sweeten and extend some of the incentives for solar only (see Solar Industry Lobbies for Manufacturing Tax Credit, Cash Grant).

Photo via Sempra Energy.

7 Comments

  • Casey Verdant 12/8/09 5:53 PM

    An increase in funding and interest in solar energy is such a good sign of where this country’s economy is headed. ARRA is just one of many solutions available. There’s a neat website with hundreds of case studies on emerging green technology products and solutions that can give you ideas about how to take your business green using solar energy: http://www.greencollareconomy.com

    It’s the largest b2b green directory on the web, and has lots of information about solar power.

    Reply
  • JoeJoe 12/9/09 3:24 PM

    Rooferguy… What do you think is an average DC-to-AC derate factor for residential systems? PVWatts default value of .77 seems steep. Is this number still correct?

    Reply
  • Dr. Matania Ginosar 12/9/09 10:37 PM

    The total long article on photovoltaic above did not mention even once, unless I miss it, the energy generated by photovoltaic system or the price per kWh.. Why, because very little energy is generated and the price to our society is very high. Why these are important? Because the reality is that we are in the middle of a real global warming and the purpose of green energy should be dedicated to replace fossil-generated electricity with GHG-free electrical energy. And this is not happening now on any meaningful scale.

    We want to replace Germany’s prominent position with PV. What a futility. Germany spent some 70 billion dollars over more than a decade and is now getting a miniscule one third of one percent (1/3 %) of its electricity from PV. In the mean time they are not reducing their dependence on coal power plants. Oppositely, tens of coal power plants are now in the pipeline to go on line in the coming few years. Some new ones are already on line.

    So, what did the Germans achieve, more GHG from coal and the erroneous satisfaction that they are going green.
    And the USA is falling into the same ignorance and waste. First we do not have billions to waste on future dreams. We do not have the time to play with GHG. Put the money into wind energy which in many cases can compete now with fossil electricity. We will general several times the electricity per dollar that PV can. Put money into R&D for new technologies including solar. Put money into central tower solar that is so much more economical and generate more green energy that way too. But do not claim that we are going green when what we are doing is giving huge profit to solar companies.
    Dr. Steven Chu is not so sold on current solar PV. He said that the price has to drop by ten to one to be useful on a mass scale. And that is what we need- mass replacement of coal generated electricity by conservation, efficiency and green technologies. A utility manager told me recently that despite the drop in solar panels, the price of the PV systems remained the same to the users. The profit, however to the solar company increased. We did not get more electricity per dollar at all.

    The many jobs that are generated by subsidies for solar should be given to many more workers performing energy conservation. Most of our existing housing stock is poorly insulated and waste considerable amount of energy. But conservation is not “sexy” and very little is done in this area. Why, there is no national Conservation organization that pushes our legislators, both at the local level in California, and the national level in Congress. So every one “knows” that conservation is important but we do very little conservation.

    Do put money into PV but never talk, never mention how much energy is actually generated by PV and how much reduction is occurring in our GHG emission.

    Sadly we are so blind to reality, it is amazing how much energy and money we waste on technologies that satisfy our emotions but not reducing our GHG.

    For more on the reality of PV see my web: ginosaronglobalwarming.org

    Reply
  • rooferguy 12/9/09 10:38 PM

    That number is still pretty accurate.  But for AC panels I’d say that it should be closer to 80% since there is no panel mismatch problem and the microinverters are 95+% efficient.

    Reply
  • JoeJoe 12/9/09 11:24 PM

    Good deal. Thanks for the info RG. Hey StevieP… Care to place a gentleman’s bet (cough) on what Germany will do with their FiT?

    Reply
Need an avatar? Get one here: Gravatar