PG&E Sued Over Smart Meters, Slows Down Bakersfield Deployment

Pacific Gas & Electric denies a lawsuit’s claims that smart meters are overcharging customers in Bakersfield. Still, it has slowed down smart meter deployments in the city.

When in doubt, sue – and slow down.

Pacific Gas & Electric has "paused" installing smart meters in the Bakersfield area because of complaints from residents that their new Pacific Gas & Electric smart meters are overcharging them. PG&E denies the allegations, noting that the rise in electricity bills some customers have seen come from other factors, such as regulator-approved rate hikes and air conditioning spikes during heat waves. Nonetheless, it has put a halt on new meters for now, utility spokesman Paul Moreno said Tuesday.

Complaints for power have now taken the form of a lawsuit.

Pete Flores, of Bakersfield, claims in the suit filed last week in Kern County Superior Court that ever since PG&E installed a smart meter at his home, he's been charged for more electricity than he has used. Right now Flores – who says his average bill as jumped from about $200 a month to about $500 to $600 a month since he got a smart meter – is the only named plaintiff.

But his attorney, Michael Louis Kelly of the El Segundo, Calif.-based law firm Kirtland & Packard, is seeking class action status for the lawsuit to include every PG&E customer who has a smart meter and thinks they've been overcharged, saying the utility needs to prove that those two-way communicating meters aren't the cause.

"PG&E's taking a position that nothing's wrong, yet there are thousands and thousands of people saying there is," Kelly said Tuesday.

PG&E has maintained from the beginning that its meters have proven to be accurate in multiple tests, from the factory floor to in the field. The utility points to several electricity rate hikes in the previous year, as well as hot weather that likely caused people to use more power to run air conditioners, as the likely causes of the increases (see Green Light post).

"The allegations in the lawsuit are untrue and have no merit," said utility spokesman Denny Boyles in an official statement. "PG&E's and manufacturers' quality assurance processes show the meters are accurate and are performing well."

PG&E's $2.2 billion, 10-million smart meter deployment continues apace in other regions, Moreno noted. That rollout is now hitting about 12,000 to 15,000 meters per day, or one every two seconds, Andrew Tang, PG&E's director of smart energy web, said last week (see Smart Grid's Low-Tech Savings: Fewer Truck Rolls).

Still, the tempest in Bakersfield underscores the public challenges utilities may face as they deploy smart grid systems such as smart meters. Utilities need approval from state regulators to increase their electricity rates to pay for the cost of such projects. Claims that the equipment is malfunctioning, whether true or false, could complicate that process.

As for the lawsuit, it isn't limiting its sights to PG&E. Other defendants named in the complaint include Wellington Energy Inc., the installer of the meters, as well as "DOE Defendants 1-100," or any company that might have played any role in the utility's smart meter deployment, from wireless communications to back-end software, as well as unspecified roles.

Kelly said his law firm has been contacted by hundreds of people who have PG&E smart meters that have complaints about their power bills. That's in line with numbers of Bakersfield residents who have brought similar complaints to California State Sen. Dean Florez, who brought the issue to public attention last month.

Florez (no relation to plaintiff Pete Flores) asked the California Public Utilities Commission to force PG&E to halt its smart meter deployment. The CPUC didn't do that, but it did order the utility to find a third party expert to "test and validate meter and billing accuracy" in Bakersfield.

PG&E, for its part, sees smart meters as giving customers more insight into their power bills, and thus helping them save energy, Boyles noted. Right now customers can go outside and see their current usage on a digital readout, he said.

In the future, of course, PG&E and many other utilities deploying smart meters want to link them to energy control systems in customers' homes and businesses. That could offer far greater energy savings, including automated  

PG&E is deploying smart meters made by General Electric and Landis+Gyr and networked by Silver Spring Networks. It is also replacing some previously deployed meters, which include meters deployed in Bakersfield in 2007 that used technology from Distribution Control Systems Inc.

Switzerland-based Landis+Gyr issued a statement Tuesday saying that it has installed about 300 million meters – and about 1.5 million remote-connect smart meters to utility customers throughout North America.

"No issues regarding design, quality, accuracy or functionality have been reported by any customer," Stan March, senior vice president of corporate communications, said in a prepared statement.

Comments [6]

  • Kevin 11/11/09 4:58 AM

    A significant part of smart meter cost justification for utilities is the fact that the additional data available to them will enable them to change the billing rate structure to include Time of Use billing (much like a cell phone). The question is whether or when will the utilities have the gumption to change residential consumer rates from flat rates to TOU rates and face the wrath of the millions of consumers that will inevitably end up with higher bills until they shift energy consumption to off peak rate hours. I understand the few ways I could accomplish that in my home would be to use the delay function on my dishwasher to ensure it only starts late at night and by limiting laundry washing and drying to Sundays. While this approach will reduce my TOU bill, depending on the TOU rates and the difference in rates between the high and low time zones, this may or may not result in a lower bill than prior to the TOU rate. 
    The article does not specify whether TOU rates have been implemented so I assume not.  This leaves me wondering whether these consumers have had a demand charged added to their rate structure, or if one existed before, whether the algorithm to calculate the demand charge has been modified and applied when these smart meters were deployed. Alternatively from a pure mathematical perspective, even without changing the rate or algorithm, the granularity of the data available from smart meters could result in a change in the bill - in favor of the utility.

    Reply
      • Scott 11/20/09 8:31 AM

        Interesting point you make. So if a motor cycles on and off and is not soft start the spike in amperage on startup is recorded and charged at a higher rate for that instant? So standard meters are not capable of recording this spike, only the increased usage for the run time of the motor?  If true it would be in the utilities favor but it also leads to some interesting ways to lower your bill.

  • Walter Yu, P.E., LEED AP 11/11/09 10:59 AM

    Interesting article, and it may be worth noting that the smart-grid meter roll-out is occurring in regions outside of Bakersfield so other factors may be the reason for why residents there are experiencing higher energy bills.

    Reply
  • Ivan Bishop 11/17/09 5:58 PM

    Seems to me PGE and the CPUC bulldozed it through as usual.
    Heres a better idea.
    1 in TEN customers who gets a so called smart meter, ALSO gets a BRAND NEW old fashioned reliable meter installed in-line AT THE SAME time. Lets see if the meters agree.

    Its clearly a way of screwing customers, forget all the so called green issues.

    Reply
  • Dr. No 11/20/09 4:31 PM

    The incentive for PG&E to do smart meters is a different and very tangible one:
    http://www.silverspringnet.com/solutions/credit_collections.html
    Using smart meters they can turn on and off the electricity if you did not pay and they can enhance collections. They can reduce the A/R time all of which is more money fatser for them (yes I know it is owed to them). Reducing A/R time is a very bottom line oriented approach and has nothing to do with the eco-sauce poured over it.

    Reply
  • JoeJoe 11/20/09 9:45 PM

    Dr. No… The biggest single benefit to the utility seems to be the elimination of meter readers. See page 16.

    http://www.edisonfoundation.net/iee/reports/deciding_on_smart_meters.pdf

    I don’t think the economic arguments of Borenstein et al. are eco-sauce. Time sensitive (i.e. demand sensitive) airline and phone rates are familiar pricing models. In a land so proud of capitalism there sure is a disconnect when it comes to rational electricity pricing.

    I’m going to have to go with the NEW FANGLED solid state meters over the BRAND NEW old fashioned induction meters. I’m pretty sure the solid state meters are an order of magnitude more accurate and reliable that the spinning disc models.

    Reply
.