Meg Whitman’s “Colossal Mistake” on Green

We video interview VC Steve Westly.

Meg Whitman’s “Colossal Mistake” on Green

Venture capitalist and former California Controller Steve Westly worked with California Gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman at eBay, but he's not a big fan of her plans to suspend one of the state's regulations for curbing greenhouse gases.

"That would be a stunning step in the wrong direction," Westly said during a recent interview during the Sustainable Capital Forum sponsored by investment bank Wood Warren. (see video.) "Most of the people I know throughout Silicon Valley realize that to be a colossal mistake. This is the highest growth job segment. This state's job engine for the future is in clean technology.

"It is one of the key reasons you will see a Democratic governor in 2010," he added.

Last year, Whitman, the leading Republican candidate for governor, published an op-ed piece last September claiming that AB 32--which seeks to create mechanisms to drop greenhouse gas levels to 1990 levels by 2020 and below 80 percent levels by 2050- and the regulations surrounding it would lead to job losses in the state. As a result, she's promised to put a moratorium on it.

"Signed by Gov. Schwarzenegger in 2006, AB 32 may have been well intentioned. But it is wrong for these challenging times," Whitman wrote." The governor has the ability to issue an executive order putting a moratorium on most AB 32-related rules. I urge him to do so.  And if he does not, I will issue that order on my first day as governor."

Fat chance getting Arnold to act on that suggestion. Schwarzenegger champions AB 32 (also called the Global Warming Solutions Act) and other green policies passed during his time in office as his chief accomplishments. It was also one of those increasingly rare moments of bipartisanship: the original author Fran Pavley is a democrat. The governor has also obtained tax and other credits for green manufacturers: if there's a ribbon cutting ceremony at a factory, he's there.

Whether Whitman would actually go forward with her AB 32 plan-which often gets prominence in the radio ads the multimillionaire currently carpet bombing the airwaves with-remains an open question. She talks about suspending it, but some of the fastest growing employers in the state come from green tech and energy efficiency. Do you kill actual jobs to save jobs that might go away?

Green initiatives also seem to enjoy strong support in Silicon Valley, the entertainment world and in real estate. (LEED certified buildings tend to achieve higher rents and contractors who remain working report an upswing in LEED projects.) And there are enough vague caveats in her statements to let her wriggle free. Nontetheless, expect to hear more as the election moves forward.

Governments historically often helped jumpstart new markets through regulations and funds, Westly added. That's how we got telephones and railroads. The economic benefits of going green are becoming apparent across the U.S. as well.

In any event, Westly is an interesting character. Other things on his mind:

--He is a fan of investing in companies that can exploit waste heat. His firm, in fact, has already invested in a specialist in China. "China is far ahead because the country is covered in smoke stacks" that emit heat.

--Battery start-ups might have to get bought before they get their big sales contracts. "If you are a car company like Tesla or Nissan you are not going to want to take a chance on a small guy. You are going to wait for Sony or Samsung to buy them," he said.

--IPOs could take off this year. In turn, that could slow down the pace of acquisitions.

There's more on the video. Forgive the ambient noise. It was filmed in a restaurant under low light conditions. (Your transparency in the media moment for the day.)

 

7 Comments

  • randydutton 02/12/10 5:57 PM

    Green energy can’t progress without rare earth elements (REE).  http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/01/business/global/01minerals.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1

    Without a domestic source of REEs, you might as well hand most of your money over to China, which has the monopoly on most REEs.  Environmentalists have blocked REE mining in the US, and inadvertantly have prevented America (and California) from manufacturing many of the very sustainable devices the environmentalist sold politicians and the public on years ago, and continue to sell the illustion today.

    Mountain Pass, California is America’s single best potential source of REEs.  Too bad environmental policy got them shut down.  It takes 2-4 pounds of neodymium to make a Prius.  It takes much more to make a windmill.  Some REEs are used in refining, lasers, high capacity data storage, advanced weaponry.

    China thanks you for creating such a high demand for REEs and sending business their way, because starting in 2012, China no longer will export many REEs.  Rather, they will sell us the finished products (MADE IN CHINA).  And by the way, East Asia emits 40 billion pounds of non-CO2 aerosol pollutants per year.  It increases every time we shift more jobs to China.

    Reply
  • randydutton 02/12/10 6:05 PM

    USGS Report on Rare Earth Elements - “The United States once was largely self-sufficient
    in these critical materials (REE), but over
    the past decade has become dependent upon
    imports (fig. 1). In 1999 and 2000, more
    than 90% of REE required by U.S. industry
    came from deposits in China…Some Applications of the Rare Earth Elements
    Many applications of REE are characterized
    by high specificity and high unit value.
    For example, color cathode-ray tubes and
    liquid-crystal displays used in computer
    monitors and televisions employ europium
    as the red phosphor; no substitute is known.
    Owing to relatively low abundance and
    high demand, Eu is quite valuable—$250 to
    $1,700/kg (for Eu2O3) over the past decade.
    Fiber-optic telecommunication cables
    provide much greater bandwidth than the
    copper wires and cables they have largely
    replaced. Fiber-optic cables can transmit
    signals over long distances because they
    incorporate periodically spaced lengths of
    erbium-doped fiber that function as laser
    amplifiers. Er is used in these laser repeaters,
    despite its high cost (~$700/kg), because
    it alone possesses the required optical
    properties.
    Specificity is not limited to the more
    exotic REE, such as Eu or Er. Cerium, the
    most abundant and least expensive REE,
    has dozens of applications, some highly
    specific. For example, Ce oxide is uniquely
    suited as a polishing agent for glass. The polishing action of CeO2 depends on both
    its physical and chemical properties, including
    the two accessible oxidation states of
    cerium, Ce3+ and Ce4+, in aqueous solution.
    Virtually all polished glass products, from
    ordinary mirrors and eyeglasses to precision
    lenses, are finished with CeO2.
    Permanent magnet technology has been
    revolutionized by alloys containing Nd,
    Sm, Gd, Dy, or Pr. Small, lightweight,
    high-strength REE magnets have allowed
    miniaturization of numerous electrical and
    electronic components used in appliances,
    audio and video equipment, computers,
    automobiles, communications systems, and
    military gear. Many recent technological
    innovations already taken for granted (for
    example, miniaturized multi-gigabyte portable
    disk drives and DVD drives) would
    not be possible without REE magnets.
    Environmental applications of REE
    have increased markedly over the past
    three decades. This trend will undoubtedly
    continue, given growing concerns about
    global warming and energy efficiency.
    Several REE are essential constituents of
    both petroleum fluid cracking catalysts and
    automotive pollution-control catalytic converters.
    Use of REE magnets reduces the
    weight of automobiles. Widespread adoption
    of new energy-efficient fluorescent
    lamps (using Y, La, Ce, Eu, Gd, and Tb)
    for institutional lighting could potentially
    achieve reductions in U.S. carbon dioxide
    emissions equivalent to removing one-third
    of the automobiles currently on the road.
    Large-scale application of magnetic-refrigeration
    technology (described below) also
    could significantly reduce energy consumption
    and CO2 emissions.
    In many applications, REE are advantageous
    because of their relatively low toxicity.
    For example, the most common types
    of rechargeable batteries contain either cadmium (Cd) or lead. Rechargeable lanthanum-
    nickel-hydride (La-Ni-H) batteries are
    gradually replacing Ni-Cd batteries in computer
    and communications applications and
    could eventually replace lead-acid batteries
    in automobiles. Although more expensive,
    La-Ni-H batteries offer greater energy density,
    better charge-discharge characteristics,
    and fewer environmental problems upon
    disposal or recycling. As another example,
    red and red-orange pigments made with La
    or Ce are superseding traditional commercial
    pigments containing Cd or other toxic
    heavy metals.
    The next high-technology application
    of the REE to achieve maturity may be
    magnetic refrigeration. The six REE ions
    Gd3+ through Tm3+ have unusually large
    magnetic moments, owing to their several
    unpaired electrons. A newly developed
    alloy, Gd5(Si2Ge2), with a “giant magnetocaloric
    effect” near room temperature reportedly will allow magnetic refrigeration
    to become competitive with conventional
    gas-compression refrigeration. This new
    technology could be employed in refrigerators,
    freezers, and residential, commercial,
    and automotive air conditioners. Magnetic
    refrigeration is considerably more efficient
    than gas-compression refrigeration and
    does not require refrigerants that are flammable
    or toxic, deplete the Earth’s ozone
    layer, or contribute to global warming.”

    The point is, that Meg is much more likely to look at the total picture than a politician pandering to the environmental movement.  And the result would be more high tech jobs in California than her opponent could create.  Capital is finite, and just wishing “green jobs” to appear is idiotic.

    Reply
  • Casey Verdant 02/13/10 9:42 PM

    This is a great summary of Meg Whitman’s record on green tech and plans for suspending some of Schwarzenegger’s most environmentally-friendly policies. California has become a leader in the nation on solar and wind projects, and their VC promotions for green tech have encouraged a lot of jobs and R&D.

    Researching how to make your company, product, or next project more Green? Go to http://www.greencollareconomy.com for sustainability white papers and the largest b2b green directory on the web.

    Reply
  • Patrick 02/16/10 4:30 PM

    The Green Guy claims: “This state’s job engine for the future is in clean technology.”

    If it such a great sector, why does it need Government mandates, regulations and subsidies?!?
    Maybe the other jobs are all dying off because they are being killed by taxes and regulations?!?

    “Governments historically often helped jumpstart new markets through regulations and funds, Westly added. That’s how we got telephones and railroads.”
    He’s WRONG. Private individuals invented and built these. The Great Northern Railroad was a great private railroad. Telephones were private until 1912 and govt started regulating….

    If Green Tech needs Govt taxes and regulations to be done, then maybe it shouldnt be done.

    Reality is that this Cali energy bill is a TRANSFER OF WEALTH from taxpayers and ratepayers to corrupt special interests that wear Green labels and engage in green-washing. GreenTechMedia is a part of the scam, encouraging these policies without ever mentioning the COST of these mandates and subsidies to all the other industries and consumers in the economy.

    Reply
      • Alex Stevens 03/3/10 10:05 PM

        Bravo Patrick!
        A refreshing dose of common sense.

  • Tom Gearing 04/2/10 11:49 AM

    “The Great Northern Railroad was a great private railroad.”  This is absolutely true.  But does it contradict the statement that government subsidies went to railroads?  Not at all. The U.S. government provided the loans for transcontinental railroad building, and: “The law also provided that a company could be given up to twenty sections (a section is a square mile) of land for every mile of track put down.”  This was a massive subsidy. One square mile = 640 acres, so to look at this in the more familiar units, 12,800 acres of land PER MILE of railroad built.  Thiss massive subsidy was needed because the free market had no interest whatsoever in risking it’s capital on some foolish “transcontinental line.”  Please not the sarcasm.  Converting the USA from a nation with profitable regional railroads but no transcontinental service into a nation with real national railroads took massive government subsidies.  And we are much better off for it.
    “Live by the truth, and the truth will set you free.”

    Reply
Need an avatar? Get one here: Gravatar