• Monday, March 10, 2008 Latest Update: 4:19PM

Greentech Solar

LDK Sinks on Silicon, Economic Fears

The Chinese solar-wafer manufacturer's shares hit an all-time low of $19.82 per share Monday after concerns about its inventory reporting, as well as fears of an economic recession -- and news that one of its silicon suppliers is dumping toxic waste in China.

LDK Solar (NYSE: LDK) hit another record low of $19.82 per share Monday after closing below its IPO price of $27 per share every day last week.

The stock rebounded to $21.50 per share by the close of trading Monday, but that’s a 72 percent drop from September’s peak of $76.75. 

Monday’s share price was a 3.5 percent drop from LDK’s previous record low of $22.27, which it hit on June 12, less than two weeks after its May 31 initial public offering.

Even in the two-month slump after LDK faced allegations of inventory discrepancies from its financial controller, Charley Situ, the share prices only slipped below its IPO price once, on Nov. 27, when the shares hit a low of $26.15.

Why are investors more bearish now than they were then, even after an independent audit in December found "no material discrepancies" (see Inventory Concerns Keep Haunting LDK and Independent LDK Audit Finds ’No Material Errors’)?

First of all, analysts apparently remain suspicious about the company’s accounting practices.

The recent share-price fall began March 3, when Goldman Sachs analyst Cheryl Tang lowered her price target from $33 per share to $28 per share, even though she kept a Neutral rating on the stock after upgrading it from Sell at the end of February.

The same day, Barron’s reported that LDK’s fourth-quarter balance sheet seemed to validate Situ’s claims.

CEO Xiaofeng Peng last week defended the company, explaining that it would use all the silicon it had in stock (see LDK Defends its Inventory Accounting).

But some investors were disappointed to hear the company doesn’t plan to release the independent audit report. Peng said that the auditor, not LDK, owns the report, but audits normally are owned by the company that commissions them. 

Not all of the drop can be blamed on these issues, however.

Solar shares have been falling overall based on concerns that a recession could be coming and that U.S. renewable-energy incentives might not get renewed.

SunPower fell 6.5 percent to close at $56.11 per share, for example, and Canadian Solar fell 15 percent Monday to close at $17.41 per share.

A Washington Post article about Chinese solar-silicon companies dumping toxic waste also likely didn’t help. The story focused on Luoyang Zhounggui, which sells silicon to LDK, Suntech Power and Canadian Solar, according to Piper Jaffray analyst Jesse Pichel.

In a research note, Pichel said the article could have "negative repercussions" that could lead to additional supply risk for these customers and "exacerbate anti-Chinese sentiment for Chinese solar products."

The WilderHill Clean Energy Index, which tracks U.S. clean-energy stocks, fell 2.3 percent to close at 201.79 points Friday and then 4.25 percent to close at 193.21 points Monday.

At LDK, investor reactions have varied, and message boards have been ringing with opinions on both sides.

On a Google investor message board, one commenter posting as "taxstar" said an inventory report would be needed to clear LDK and said he or she would short the stock. "What the hell is wrong with these people????" the writer said.

Another comment posted from "davylw" argued that LDK "has done its best."

"They asked for a third company for auditing inventory," "davylw" wrote. "What do you want a company to do?"

Meanwhile, one writer posting a message titled "Im depressed … I really am" as "greasytrades" on a Yahoo message board said he or she was shocked by the downturn.

"I thought I did a thorough risk analysis," "greasytrades" posted. "I thought they were at their bottom and I was wrong. I’m looking for a ledge to sit on and think about jumping off."

Another writer posting as mom_pop401k responded with encouragement: "When your grand children ask how you found the courage to head off cataclysmic climate change, tell them you were one of the first investors in LDK solar."

In a conversation with Greentech Media, Hakan Telenius, organizer of an LDK investor group, said he believes much of the company’s problem comes down to the need for better relations with analysts and the public.

While Telenius is satisfied that LDK is being upfront about its inventory accounting, he added that a perceived "evasiveness" is discounting the stock.

"The core problem here is one of communication," he said. "LDK needs to work harder with the analysts, spend more time and explain everything."

Telenius also posted a comment on the Google message board saying the share price won’t go back up until LDK can convince the Street that it is fairly reporting its inventory, has enough cash to carry out its planned expansion and will be able to produce enough silicon next year to meet its expected revenues.

"How to do it all?" he asked. "Improve communications; provide clear answers to questions that can be answered and equally clear answers as to why other questions cannot and will not be answered."

Comments [5]

  • john smith 03/11/08 2:10 AM

    This is a bias article.  Should have mentioned that the external audit report contain competitive sensitive information that cannot be released to the public as jack Lai has repeatedly stated.

    Note that there are thousands of messages posted on Yahoo.  Janifer Kho selected few posts to fit her point.  The ones she selected are simply bias. 

    Wish Greentech has better journalist.

    Reply
  • Dillan Tripper 03/11/08 9:16 AM

    Chinookia, you’re totally missing the point (and the spelling, for that matter). First of all, Jennifer included some very positive messages in the story…Did you read the story? Second, plenty of companies release audits with the sensitive information redacted. Third, LDK hasn’t been honest about the reasons for failing to release the audit. It owns that audit and could do it if the company so desired. Something tells me you’re from LDK!

    Reply
  • john smith 03/11/08 10:47 AM

    Dill,
    I’m not from LDK and just because I pointed out the bias in the article, I’m “totally missing the point”?? 

    No doubt the inventory topic is controversial.  Hence, if someone were to write anymore articles about the inventory topic, it is critical that the person is not bias.  There was no mentioned of CFO have clarified the inventory issue with the LDK investor group.  If you read that report, you know the inventory is as clear as one can get. 

    Name some companies that release sensitive audit information in the solar sector.

    Again, you’re using words such as LDK hasn’t been “honest” with the audit report without specifying what it is not honest about.  Word like “honesty” has a profound impact on a stock price and should not be used lightly, otherwise it is pure manipulation.

    The external auditors with the highest reputation in this field and said LDK do not have inventory issue, why do the analysts continue to say there is problem?  Ms Kho could have speculated that as do many people on the other side of the argument for the fairness purposes. The negativity is bias and pick and choose messages from Yahoo board is simply bad journalism, but good sensationalism. 

    Reply
  • Daniel Stair 03/11/08 1:15 PM

    On the Monday that this story was published, LDK Solar’s share price was actually down a smaller percentage than most all other solars.  Because of that, I would question the headline of this article.  LDK was actually showing resistance to the downtrend of the entire solar sector, particularly on that day.

    Headlines are critical, and even if the content of a story is fair and balanced, the vast majority of people will focus on the headline first and the details second.

    Also, when writing a story like this, one should question the credentials of their sources.  For example, the Piper Jaffray analayst you mentioned is likely the LEAST credible source you could have found.  The link below should give you some idea of what you’re dealing with there:

    http://www.pjfraudinfocenter.com/

    Note that the following site lists LDK Solar as one of the top ten most manipulated stocks:

    http://www.basherbusters.com/

    The analysts you chose to reference, are suspected by many to be leading participants in that manipulation.

    These people are promoting any little negative tidbit they can find, true or untrue, with or without proof.

    For example, here you find that LDK Solar has clearly stated that it is not one of the suspected dirty solar manufacurers.  And, they offer photos to proove it:

    http://www.ldksolar.com/progress pic.html

    Perhaps you should write about the REAL LDK Solar story rather than following the wolves around picking up the scraps that they leave for you to find?

    LDK Solar likely stands to have a more positive impact on solar energy than any other company or government on this planet.  As their Polysilicon plants come online, their stated mission is to become the largest solar wafer manufacturer in the world and to bring down the price of solar power immensely, making solar energy more affordable across the planet.  Now THAT is a story more worth telling than what Jesse Pichel thinks about anything.

    Reply
  • john smith 03/11/08 1:40 PM

    Wow, check out newsboard on Yahoo site for LDK today.  Wall St. is posting negative articles written in Oct 2007 to scare investors.

    How fair is that?

    Reply
.