Konarka Gets $20M More for Organic Solar Cells

$150 million raised—so far—in a decade-long quest for low-efficiency, niche-market solar cells.

Whatever else one can say about organic solar cell aspirant Konarka, the startup sure is great at raising money.

Konarka just announced $20 million in strategic investment from Japan's Konica Minolta.  That brings Konarka's total to more than $150M in angel funding, venture capital, strategic investment and private equity money raised since 2001.  And throw in at least $10 million more in DARPA, DOE, NSF, U.S. Army, bank loans and credit lines in the last ten years. 

The latest investor to grace that long list, Konica Minolta, is in the OLED business, which might provide some synergy with Konarka's roll-to-roll technology -- they hope.

Konarka is headquartered in Lowell, Mass., and has a manufacturing facility in New Bedford, Mass., with European headquarters in Nurnberg, Germany, business development offices in Asia, and a research and development facility in Austria.  That sounds like a healthy burn rate.   Konarka was founded in 2001 by scientists at UMass Lowell and has received investment from Chevron, Good Energies, Draper Fisher Jurvetson, the Massachusetts Green Energy Fund, Vanguard Ventures, Mackenzie Financial, Partech, and many more. 

I have spoken to a few of those early investors about their investment in Konarka.  One comment, off-the-record, was unprintable; another comment, made anonymously, was that the investor had no idea at the time of investment that First Solar would hit the numbers on cost and efficiency that they have. This anonymous commenter also added that Konarka was in a sort of limbo of commercial production capability but no production demand -- in essence, that their low efficiency nets out in no incentive for mainstream market adoption.  

Low efficiency and difficulty in achieving long lifetimes leave OSCs to go after niche markets like consumer wearables and luggage.  The ten-year-old startup has also mentioned tents, awnings and BIPV as possible end-markets. These applications could result in real business, but it seems difficult to get to serious megawattage -- and difficult to justify as a VC-funded firm

Next generation solar cell developers include Konarka and Plextronics in the organic photovoltaics field, and Dyesol, EPFL, G24i, Mitsubishi and Peccell on the dye-sensitized-cells front.

OSCs remain a compelling technology.  One of the appeals of third-generation thin-film solar cells is that they can be manufactured using solution-based, low-temperature roll-to-roll manufacturing methods, which use conventional printing techniques on flexible substrates.  That is the sirens' call that keeps the VC money flowing. 

Our analyst team at GTM Research has written a report and forecast on "third-generation" solar, which includes this comparison of dye-sensitized cell technology versus organic solar cell technology:


                             My VCs gave me $150 million and all I got was this Sunbag.

7 Comments

  • ECD Fan 03/3/10 5:01 PM

    The last time I checked, Konarka’s module efficiency was 1.7% under STC (the Power Plastic 6 and 40 series and KT 3000 modules) and the warranty was unspecified.  If the warranty were 5 years, I believe there would be about 50MW worldwide annual “demand” for this product today, assuming it is sold for 2c per Watt at the factory gate and the warranty is backed by cash in escrow (if the warranty were 10 years, the selling price can double as well, to 4c per Watt).  This estimate is based on the assumption that 15%-efficient Chinese crystalline panels sell at $1.90 per Watt at the factory gate and certain general assumptions about balance-of-system costs.  Even if First Solar disappeared today, the result remains the same.

    Reply
      • Hank Deansky 03/3/10 7:57 PM

        Well, if they were going after exactly the same market as the Chinese mfr’s they’d be dead already.  It’s not the efficiency that is going to make them a Billion dollar concern quickly.  When their product ostensibly replaces half of the D cell market because it easily absobs enough inside of buildings you’ll understand why a consumer product based company like Konica was a piece of the pie.  Imagine, you just let your camera sit there on the table and it recharges itself.

      • ECD Fan 03/4/10 2:21 AM

        To Hank:

        Really?  Konarka’s target market is the battery charger market?  Maybe is some other Universe.  In this universe, most consumers get their battery chargers for free and it costs them less than 20c a year of grid-supplied electricity even if they fully recharge their iPhone every day (which comes to about 1-2 kWh a year).  Now, off-grid:  90%+ of the solar chargers on the market today use real solar cells (mono- or poly-crystalline ones made in China) - those things provide the same electric energy as Konarka but use 1/10 of the area - a crystalline cell the size of a CD can actually trickle charge an iPod nano on a bright day (a Konarka “charger” of the same area could not). 

        Inside buildings, of course, Konarka’s “charger” of any reasonable size will be totally useless - the Sunbag pictured above, for example, can’t fully recharge even a Konica/Minolta NP-1 battery (850mah/3.7 volts) under room lighting.  Things like that.  But in an imaginary Universe, one could imagine that it could.

  • Robert Trout 03/3/10 6:02 PM

    The last time Konarka was a topic in this blog, I became curious because the report was negative, yet only a few months ago Total Corp (96,000+ employees, 130 countries, energy conglomerate) had just given Konarka $40 million.  I asked what Total knew about Konarka that the rest of us don’t know, but nobody seemed to have an answer.  Now I read that Konica Minolta just gave Konarka $20 million!  What is going on?  Doesn’t anybody know?  The science doesn’t seem to support $150 million in new financing, so there must be something.  What?

    Reply
      • segway again 07/9/10 7:48 PM

        greater-fool theory

  • Peter 03/3/10 8:15 PM

    Surely the idea that putting large amounts of money into something means that it’s guaranteed to succeed must have been disproven by our recent global financial crisis.

    Reply
  • Robert Trout 03/4/10 11:09 AM

    Why are these presumably profitable companies giving Konarka so much money?  Besides curiousity, if I knew the answer, maybe these huge corporations would give me $20 million.  I could use it.

    Reply
Need an avatar? Get one here: Gravatar
.