Intersolar: Update on Solar Thermal

Solar thermal: the red-headed stepchild of the solar industry

Intersolar: Update on Solar Thermal

At least that was the distinct impression one would get from attending Intersolar in San Francisco last week.

Slower-growing, smaller market, less innovation.  Basically, solar thermal isn't sexy -- PV is.

Venture capital firms invest in PV because it has the potential to reinvent how electricity is generated.

Solar thermal heats up water for your morning shower.  Not exactly a "game-changer."

But sometimes appearances can be deceiving.  Solar thermal IS growing -- in fact, global volume growth in 2009 was higher for solar thermal than for PV.  According to the recently published Global Demand report by GTM Research analyst Shayle Kann, worldwide PV modules installed grew 24% to 7,118 MW in 2009, whereas new capacity additions for solar thermal grew from 28 GM-thermal in 2008 to 35 GW-thermal in 2009, for a growth rate of 25%.  And revenue growth was likely much stronger for solar water heating, as pricing for PV modules collapsed in 2009 (pricing was down 28%, resulting in an 11% drop in module revenues).

So while solar thermal is growing, the vast majority of that growth isn't happening here in the U.S.   China dominates the market, both in terms of manufacturing (similar to PV), and in terms of installations (unlike PV, as discussed in our recent article on exports of China's modules).

Source: REN21, CREIA, ESTIF, SEIA, GTM Research

A recent report by REN21 (Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century) entitled "RENEWABLES 2010: GLOBAL STATUS REPORT" shows strong growth for solar thermal.  According to the report, worldwide solar hot water and space heating capacity grew 21% from 149 GW-thermal in 2008 to 180 GW-thermal in 2009 (excluding unglazed swimming pool heating).  China continues to dominate this market, both in terms of manufacturing and installations.  China added about 29 GWth of solar hot water (SHW), which represents 83% of total worldwide new installations.  Of the 180 GWth of global installed SHW capacity, China now has over 131 GWth (~73%).

Worldwide Solar Hot Water Capacity (Cumulative in GW-thermal) 

Source: REN21, CREIA, ESTIF, SEIA, GTM Research

Solar water heating shipments in 2009 in the U.S. grew about 10% to 147 MWth according to estimates by SEIA, resulting in a cumulative installed capacity of 2.15 GWth (up from 2.0 GWth in 2008).  This still represents less than 2% of worldwide installed capacity, and less than 1% of new installations.  Hawaii remains the largest market, with 37% of all U.S. solar hot water (SHW) systems installed.  Because of generous state rebates, a typical homeowner in Hawaii ends up paying for only 30% of the cost of a system, resulting in a payback period of less than 3 years.  Solar hot water is much less successful in the rest of the U.S., where payback periods are generally more than 10 years (depending on state rebates, sunshine, and natural gas rates).   According to Burkhard von Sprekelsen with Valliant Solar Systems, the typical payback period for a residential system is 16 years in California and 12 years in New York.

Here is how the math works in California:

A 2-panel solar hot water system costs around $7,900; after federal and state rebates, the cost works out to about $4,200.  With natural gas prices at their current low levels, savings are only ~$260/year, so the payback period works out to 16 years.  Not a very compelling investment opportunity.  It should be noted that the math is better for larger commercial systems where the payback period is closer to five to eight years.

What will it take to make solar thermal take off in the U.S.?   There are two possibilities:

1)      Laws requiring that all new homes have solar hot water systems installed

2)      More generous government incentives to get the payback periods closer to two to three years

Hawaii has demonstrated that it can be done.  New York and other states have plans to follow in Hawaii's footsteps. Will they succeed? Let's hope so. 

9 Comments

  • Bill Woods 07/21/10 9:40 PM

    “Will they succeed?  Let’s hope so. “

    Uh, why?  Collectively spending $7,900 so we can save $260/yr doesn’t seem like an attractive investment.

    Reply
  • jak42 07/21/10 10:51 PM

    I had solar thermal installed last year in California.  The system you describe must be an open loop system or one of the direct systems with on-roof storage, like a thermosyphon. In northern California, the open loop systems don’t work because of the freeze danger, so you need a closed loop system. These are more like $10K if you get a new tank, which you typically do need because you will need to store more water. If you get a nice stainless steel tank which lasts longer, it can run even more. And, unless your house has got a space for it, you will probably need some work done on the house or outside to create a space for the tank.

    Add to that the backup tank which is needed for the winter, plus the gas for that. Typically, the back up tank will already be in place. Ultimately, the solar thermal only eliminated around 15% of my gas bill. I’m now looking at an on-demand electric backup heater which I can offset from PV.

    There are two basic problems: gas is too cheap and the solar thermal system is too expensive. If the solar thermal system would net out to around 2x the cost of a high efficiency gas tank heater, I think it would be a lot more affordable. But neither of these is likely to occur, since the guvn’mt doesn’t seem to be up for pricing carbon, and nobody seems interested in new technology for solar thermal that would radically reduce cost.

    Anyway, I have an extensive series of posts in my blog, http://netzerolife.blogspot.com, about my experience with solar thermal technology in my home. The posts were done last year, so check the archives.

    Reply
  • Rurikvred 07/22/10 12:26 AM

    First of all, solar thermal isn’t going anywhere but up, slowly.

    But really, disparaging remarks that all redheads find rude?

    “RESEARCH & ANALYSIS |  SOLAR
    BRETT PRIOR: JULY 21, 2010
    Intersolar: Update on Solar Thermal
    Solar Thermal: the red-headed stepchild of the solar industry”


    “redheaded stepchild” ??? REALLY?

    Reply
  • Successclick 07/22/10 12:36 AM

    Oh, and I own “SOLARTHERMALPANELS.COM”.  Requests to purchase this domain are common. It is for sale.

    Reply
  • Tom 07/22/10 10:47 AM

    Jak42,
    Wow, 10K for a closed loop system. I installed my own closed loop drain back system in the Santa Cruz, Ca area for $4,500 total 2 years ago. I supplied all the labor. Flat plate collectors are all that is needed for residential hot water temperatures. Glass tubes only if you live in very cold winter areas or are seeking water above 150.  Single 80 or 120 gallon water tank is all that is needed. Such a tank only has a top electric element on a timer thus only keeping the top 30 gallons hot. Our back up electric element is turned off from April to November.
    Where I live only propane gas is available. Propane is typically made from natural gas and costs 2X as much per BTU. That makes the potential savings closer to $520/year.
    Lets see, $4,500-30% tax credit=$3,000 system cost. Divide by $520/year=5.77 years to recover cost.

    Reply
      • jak42 07/23/10 1:18 PM

        Tom, Agree about flat panel, and certainly displacing more expensive propane will reduce the payback cost. Drainback systems have a freeze risk east of the Santa Cruz Mts. where I live though not on the coast because the winter temps don’t get that cold along the coast. The drainback systems are certainly cheaper than the fully closed loop system with propylene glycol as the heat transfer fluid, which is what I had installed. Also, I and I imagine many people aren’t in a position to do the labor themselves, since clambering around on a roof while using power tools are unfortunately not in the skillset I"ve got (though I often wish they were!).

        The $7.5K figure cited in the article is what I have heard quoted for thermosyphon systems with 40 gallon on roof storage, which don’t have as much freeze risk, but these systems are significantly less efficient.

  • GetSolar 07/22/10 5:19 PM

    Some of our partner installers in Hawaii, like Bonterra Solar, estimate that payback periods there for solar hot water systems would be 18 months for residential systems and 16 months for commercial systems. Shows what an effective state incentive policy can do…

    http://www.getsolar.com/blog/

    Reply
  • sailrick 08/7/10 12:23 AM

    On cruising sailboats, people use what are called “sunshowers” (that may be a brand name).  Its a simple plastic bag that holds about 5 gallons of water and is enough for a quick hot shower.  It seems there are analogous simple things like this that would be very welcome in poor third world countries where hot water is often a luxury..

    Reply
  • PFXK 08/19/10 6:10 AM

    Not so sure about that “effective” state rebate program in Hawaii. It is capped at a maximum depending upon why type of system you’re installing. Has more to do with the price I’d LP gas and electricity there, currently about 28 cents a kWh!

    Reply
Need an avatar? Get one here: Gravatar