In Michigan, a Smart Meter Plan Gets Scaled Back

Budget, not public outcry, is the problem. Will it impact Elster or GE? We shall see.

In Michigan, a Smart Meter Plan Gets Scaled Back

Consumers Energy drastically cut the budget and scope of a smart meter plan in Michigan, calling the project a casualty of hard times.

The company is cutting out smart gas meters as part of its strategy and reducing its smart meter budget from $900 million to about $500 million over the next five years. This scale-back is part of a wider decrease in spending overall, which is down from $7.2 billion to $6.4 billion.

"We have made some modifications. We are still committed to a smart grid program. We are taking out smart grid gas meter modules, they are no longer part of our plan," said Roger Morgenstern, a company spokesman for Consumers Energy.


Basically, this means that 1.7 million gas customers won't get smart meters, but the 1.8 million electric customers will. Eventually, the gas customers may get included, but this is the plan for now.

"We see more benefits with the electric smart meter because they are more dynamic," said Morgenstern.

However, Michigan residents won't start getting their electric meters until they are deployed in 2012.

It's unclear how this will affect Elster's EnergyAxis for Smart Grid Field Pilot or General Electric's first smart grid program to use high-speed wireless with WiMAX.

"We are not discussing plans with our proprietary vendors," said Morgenstern.

These cutbacks notwithstanding, Consumers Energy is still one of the largest investors in Michigan, even in this economy. The $6.4 billion in funding will go towards the implementation of the smart grids, wind generation, other renewable investments, and on-going maintenance and gas utilities.

The recession is putting extra pressure on smart grid spending nationwide.

"We have seen cutbacks happening in Boulder, Colorado in a reaction to Xcel Energy's pioneering pilot project [with a total cost of about $100 million if completed]. There was some push-back in Baltimore Gas & Electric service territory as well," said Massoud Amin, an engineering professor at the University of Minnesota. 

The smart grid will save customers money down the line. As we mentioned before in our "Baltimore Moves Forward" post, customers will save $2.6 billion over 15 years.

Amin reminds us of the daunting costs that smart grid implementation is likely to require over the next two decades. However, the $150 billion cost of implementing the smart grid should not overshadow the obvious reasons why we need a smart grid in place: more than 4% reduction in energy by 2030 would save the nation $20.4 billion, reduce the cost of outages by $49 billion per year, reduce emissions by 12% to 18% per year, and increase the nation's energy security.

As Consumers Energy and other utilities become focused on deploying smart meters, Amin worries that the overall goal of enabling the smart grid is being overlooked. Either way, he certainly doesn't want to have to cope with the increasing risk of blackouts.

6 Comments

  • Jacque 08/23/10 7:28 PM

    You know, with the economy the way it is in Michigan, it is hard to critisize business decisions.  This is a major decision, though, and definitely something to watch.  I am going to share this post with my Welcome2Green.com readers.  Thanks for the great info.

    Reply
  • A.J. Allbright 08/23/10 10:10 PM

    Outstanding article! Ironically I finally met Prof. Massoud Amin. He gave a terrific presentation and stayed to answer about two dozen questions. Here are a few related quotes from him, which he just sent with his presentation to many of us who requested it:

    “We must modernize the electric power and make it into a smarter, more secure and more resilient system, as it is a lynchpin of our economy and quality of life. I am all for electrons that are available, affordable, eco-friendly, secure and home grown in America.. The overall goal of enabling the smart grid is being missed. It’s not just about the meters, we need to think about the overall end-to-end energy system’s efficiency, security, reliability and resilience.”

    He talked about the costs of “... full implementation for a nationwide Smart Grid over a 20-year period (2010-2030):
    1) According to his work (1998-present): Cost of about $100-150 billion ($10-$13 billion per year for 10 year or longer).
    2) Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) published a study in January 2010, the actual costs will come in closer to $165 billion over the course of 20 years.
    3) Brattle Group, an energy consulting firm: $1.5 trillion spread over 20 years (~ $70-$75 billion per year, an over-estimate or upperbound?).”
    “My recommendations are:
    Despite the daunting costs of implementation noted above, integration of the Smart Grid will result in:

    1) A greater than 4% reduction in energy use by 2030; translating into $20.4 billion in savings;

    2) Costs of outages > $80 billions/year (and up to $180 billions/yr), reduced by about $49 billions per year;

    3) Increased efficiency, and reduced emissions by 12-18% per year (PNNL report, January 2010);

    4) Increased cyber/IT and overall energy security;

    5)  Transition from fossil fuel-based power generation to fluctuating energy sources such as wind, sun, and wave power as well as advanced nuclear power introduces challenging demands on the storage, dispatch, operation and integration with the power grid. From an overall energy system’s perspective, with goals of efficiency, eco-friendly, reliability, security and resilience, we’ll enable a stronger, smarter and greener power grid as a backbone to efficiently integrate intermittent renewable sources into the overall system;

    6) More efficient to move electrical power through the transmission system than to ship fuels the same distance; in addition the integration of renewable and distributed energy resources and demands will require a smarter and stronger backbone of interconnected high-voltage transmission network and distribution systems.
    7) Economic growth and job creation: Electricity’s unique capability to be produced from a wide variety of local energy sources, along with its precision, cleanliness, and efficiency, make it the ideal energy carrier for economic and social development.

    From a broader perspectives, in a single century, electricity became the foundation and prime mover of our modern society.  Not just as a clean and convenient form of energy, but as the toolmaker’s dream.  Electricity opened the doors of invention to new technologies of incredible precision, intelligence and communication, and to new forms of instrumentation and innovation.
    For the developing parts of the World, the good news is that electricity has been extended to over 1.3 billion people over the last 25 years.  As we have found in South Africa, for every 100 homes electrified, 10 to 20 new businesses are started.  Electricity frees up human labor—hours per day spent in mindless tasks such as carrying water and wood—and it provides light in the evening to read and study by.  These simple basics are the stepping stones to a better life, and a door into the global economy. Electricity is the lynchpin and enabling infrastructure for all knowledge- and innovation-based economies.”

    and he asked: “What are the costs of “business as usual” and not implementing change?”

    Reply
      • Daniel Burger 12/26/10 12:04 PM

        The massive investment in smart meter deployment will not be done without considerable rate increases.  The rate increases will over shadow the small savings to the consumer.  the final result will be higher total costs and further hype of “alternative” energy sources.  The mindset of the “alties” is that because it is non-fossil, it will be cheap.  Not by a long shot.  The equipment is extremely expensive to build, while maintainece cost estimates will on be a guess.  Better to invest the money in safe small localized nuclear electrical systems.  Smaller, not massive.  Cleaner than coal or even gas. Smaller plants will operate more efficiently, wast will be easier to recycle.

  • Technological Leadership Institute 08/24/10 9:58 AM

    @Boonsri: Thank you bringing this issue to light. It’s unfortunate that these budgets are getting scaled down, especially because smart grid implementation would pay for itself so quickly. At least we can be thankful that Michigan is still moving forward, albeit at a slower pace.

    @A.J.: Thank you for the kind words! Dr. Amin is the Director here at the Technological Leadership Institute [http://tli.umn.edu] at the University of MN. If you would like to get a little deeper insights into the smart grid, Dr. Amin regularly contributes to our blog [http://tli.umn.edu/blog].

    Reply
  • ewah 09/7/10 11:04 PM

    mbtwalkingshoesgood.com is set up as a speciality store of MBT Brand. Our goal is to make the better mbt shoes shopping. We have a good partner who is one of the mbt shoes Producers, discount mbt shoes so we can offer a cheaper price on the basis of the equal condition. All orders are free shipping, no tax,they are 100% original. This is a good platform for you to buy discount mbt walking shoes
    .

    Reply
Need an avatar? Get one here: Gravatar