Hydropower and Innovation in Fish-Friendly Turbines

New turbine designs protect fish and could end fish busing.

Doug Dixon of EPRI presented information about hydropower and fish-friendly turbines at last week's renewable energy fest at the Electric Power Research Institute.

More than 7 per cent of U.S. electricity and 75% of renewable electrical energy in the U.S. comes from hydropower according to Dixon of EPRI.  Compare that with the sub-1 per cent sliver of energy provided by solar.  According to the most recent DOE figures, there is about 80,000 megawatts of conventional hydro capacity and 18,000 megawatts of pumped storage.

Water is the leading renewable energy source used by electric utilities to generate electric power.  Hydro power is cheap, dispatchable, storable, and produced with no fuel combustion.  As with all energy sources, there is an environmental price.  Aside from the profound physical impact of damming and diverting huge waterways, fish suffer immensely - both from the difficulty in traveling upstream (if you're a salmon) and from the utter carnage of dodging turbine blades.

In 1996, DOE, EPRI and industry began a multi-year effort to develop ‘fish-friendly’ turbines for hydroelectric projects that are greater than 90% efficient and reduce fish mortality to 5% or less. By 2001, the research produced two turbine designs. The first, designed for large rivers, is currently being tested in the Columbia River. The second, designed for smaller rivers, is called the Alden/Concepts NREC turbine and features a helical-shaped runner with only three blades.  The Alden turbine has no gaps and by virtue of its larger size, turns slower, which means less impact on fish.  Up to 98 per cent of fish survive passing through the Alden turbine.
 
It is extremely expensive to protect fish.  As a testament to the resources and money devoted to fish safety by the energy industry:

  • Removable weirs costing $50 million to $70 million each are in use to channel fish away from turbines
  • The $52 million Puget Sound Energy floating surface collector or "Gulper" captures juvenile salmon out of dam's way and transports them in a half-hour tanker-truck ride downstream for release into the Skagit River (see photo).


 
Better turbine designs like the Alden turbine means much better fish survival and eliminate the need for weirs and busing fish to less dangerous neighborhoods.

Resources

 

3 Comments

  • mds 01/18/10 4:00 PM

    This is great and can help reduce detrimental effects of dams on salmon and steelhead.  Dams cause a couple of other problems for anadromous fish:
    1. The reservior can provide habitat for predatory fish, Dolly Varden or Sqawfish, that eat the salmon and steelhead smolts.
    2. Dams create choke points other predators (seals, sea lions, otters, and fish eating birds like mergansers and herrons) can use to feed more easily on adults and smolts.
    3. The reserviors trap sand and small gravel.  This reduces the amount washed downstream and reduces the quality and number of downstream spawning areas.
    4. Water temperature is adversely effected.

    I’m not apposed to dams.  Their value for power generation is noted in the article and they are even more valuable for human and agricultural water resources.  I do think power/water storage at elevated river banks and development of run-of-the-river power generation is better environmentally.

    Also, to put dams and salmon in perspective.  The top three problems with maintaining salmon and steelhead populations in the PNW are: over fishing, over fishing, and over fishing.  Over harvesting by White or Red commercial fisherman has been the primary problem since plastics and nylon was invented around World War 2 time.  The way to solve this is not better dams (that won’t hurt) but harvest near the mouth of the rivers, or at the dams, with careful counting of released adult salmon to ensure a managed escapement level of adults for spawning.  Open ocean estimates and open ocean harvest works no better than it did for the Atlantic cod.  You can’t find a submarine the size of an appartment building out there, so you can’t count them and we’re still figuring out massive ocean environment effects, natural and otherwise.

    Reply
  • Chuck 1 01/19/10 6:07 PM

    I may be mistaken but did not the state of Washington stop the hatchery production of salmon and steelheads in the late 70 or early 80 because of several court orders that allowed the first immigrants fisherman to take as many and in anyway they wanted.

    Reply
Need an avatar? Get one here: Gravatar
.