• Wednesday, September 16, 2009 Latest Update: 7:00AM

Greentech Solar

Global Solar: BIPV Market or Bust

The thin-film solar cell maker says its products have a top efficiency of 15.45 percent, and it is branching out of the “dinosaur glass module” market to get a slice of the building materials market.

Global Solar Energy wants you to know two things today: Its copper-indium-gallium-diselenide (CIGS) cells could covert as much as 15.45 percent of the sunlight that falls on them into electricity; and, it's pursuing sales in the so-called building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) market, where solar cells are embedded into building components instead of encased in glass panels and parked on a rooftop.

The company's interest in the BIPV market isn't new. Global Solar said in April 2008 that it would join Dow Building Solutions, part of Dow Chemical, to develop solar roof shingles as part of a project funded by the U.S. Department of Energy.

The Tucson, Ariz.-based company still isn't willing to say much about any other customers or installations showcasing its technology. But Global Solar expects to see commercial products with its thin films launched for the BIPV market next year, said Tim Teich, VP of sales and marketing.

"We are going to do BIPV and put it into building products instead of putting it in the dinosaur glass modules. We are using solar films where no solar has gone before," Teich said.

BIPV is a new market with lots of promises. Plenty of other companies – including CIGS thin-film maker Ascent Solar Technologies in Thornton, Colo. – are looking at turning their solar technologies into roofing products or windows.

There aren't many truly integrated solar building materials on the market, and they are expensive. But exploring the BIPV market aggressively could be wise at a time with silicon solar cells getting incredibly cheap and dominates the global solar market.

Global Solar is one of the earlier developers of CIGS thin films. The company deposits the CIGS materials on a roll of flexible stainless steel to make the solar cells, which are then connected 18 of them together to form a strip (or string, as the company calls it).

The company sells the strings to companies that assemble them into panels. This model eliminates the need for the company to invest in factories to make the final products, and strings are a lighter and cheaper to ship than panels, which are typically encased in glass.

Global Solar started selling the strings last summer, but has remained largely mum about the customers that are making CIGS panels from its cells. Solon, a Germany-based solar panel maker, owns 19 percent of Global Solar.

Solon made the panels used for a 750-kilowatt system installed on the grounds of Global Solar's factory in Tucson. Global Solar announced the installation last December and called it the first commercial-scale deployment of its products.

The solar company has a 40-megawatt factory in Tucson and a 35-megawatt factory in Germany. Global Solar had planned add another 100 megawatts of production capacity by the end of 2009, but scratched the idea when the recession hit, Teich said. The company's is running its factories at 50 percent capacity, he added.

Last year, Global Solar said its cells could achieve 10 percent efficiency. The company has since made cells from its production line that could achieve 15.45 percent efficiency, a figure verified by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

Solar companies typically send their best cells to the lab for testing and verification. Those that roll out of factories could have lower efficiencies.

Global Solar is making strings that could get as high as 11.7 percent, Teich said. The average is between 10 percent and 11 percent, he added. When assembled into a panel, the efficiencies are likely to drop further since not all cells coming off a production line have exactly the same efficiency.

Raising efficiencies is crucial for the company to offer more attractive products and reduce manufacturing costs. Teich declined to disclose the production cost.

Other CIGS thin-film makers have been reporting higher efficiencies lately. Germany-based Solibro announced just Tuesday that it is producing panels at 12 percent efficiency.

Last week, Nanosolar in San Jose, Calif., said its CIGS cells could achieve 16.4 percent. But the medium efficiency of the cells rolling off its production lines falls between 11 percent and 12 percent (see Nanosolar Boosts Cell Efficiency, Starts Mass Production).

NuvoSun, a newer entrant based in Palo Alto, Calif., said last month it had produced a test cell that could reach 11.8 percent. Mass-producing cells is more complex than making a test cell, so the efficiency of market-ready cells would be lower.

Comments [10]

  • StevePluvia 09/16/09 12:13 PM

    Global Solar had better find that elusive “BIPV” product before they trash talk PV on glass.  There’s a reason none of the profitable PV mfgrs have a BIPV product. I wonder how many Global Solar execs it takes to figure this out (or screw in a light bulb) before they have to idle another 50% of their unprofitable factories…

    Reply
      • David Flaherty 09/17/09 1:29 PM

        Check out Lumeta, based out of Irvine, CA and San leandro, Ca.  390watts per panel, 4’x8’ sheet that is a peel and stick panel.  Hasnt hit the market yet, but will in the fiest quater 2010, it will be the only (Highoutput Built in PV on the market)  http://www.lumetasolar.com/

      • StevePluvia 09/17/09 3:25 PM

        David F:  Lumeta is not cost competitive, and its not BIPV.  Peel-n-stick advantage is reduced mounting—that amounts to about $.25/watt.  The downside is care must be taken to avoid pooling of water on the product, walking on the product, hi temps from mounting directly to roofs (which substantially reduce power output).  Priced at $2.25/watt or below I’d buy em; any more and I can install better, more durable product for much less.

  • semiconductor_rep 09/17/09 11:08 AM

    I’m tempted to see this as a defensive move, a sign that Global’s cost structure is not competitive for commercial and utility-scale on-grid applications.

    Reply
      • StevePluvia 09/17/09 3:17 PM

        Semi rep:  Agree 100%.  Their production costs are too high so the only market available is niche.  Certainly not what their original business plan projected.  We’re rapidly seeing a separation between the players who ~claimed~ they could produce for under $1/watt from those that can deliver on that promise.  The best indicator is the “going out of business” sign on their door…

  • Peggy 09/17/09 4:31 PM

    Flexible thin-film BIPV solutions are not “new”and not “expensive.” United Solar aka “UNI-SOLAR” has been making BIPV products since 1997 with ~240MW production capacity right now.  BIPV solutions offer a cost savings where there is a budget for roofing or re-roofing with zero possibility of roof leaking/voided roof warranty. 
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOxt_z4QkDQ

    Reply
      • Eric Wesoff 09/17/09 5:45 PM

        Dear Peggy,
        ECD Fan might have something to say about whether Unisolar is “expensive.”  If by expensive you mean “costs way too much” then Unisolar is expensive.  I guess it’s not “new.”  I don’t think it’s actually “BIPV.”  And thanks for the video link - does Bono of U2 endorse Uni-Solar?

      • StevePluvia 09/17/09 9:19 PM

        Peggy, UniSolar product is not cost competitive with other PV, its inefficient and the company has pretty much zero chance of surviving.  Others make more efficient and more cost competitive peel-n-stick pv.  In short, if you make the mistake of buying their overpriced product you don’t have to worry about the warranty because odds are they won’t be in business 24 months from now.  I suggest you do some homework on this subject.

  • Peggy 09/18/09 3:08 PM

    Wow, why so hostile guys? I bet you are a “shot seller” on the market? Right?
    For the rest of the readers information, ECD has been around since 1960 and has much stronger financials and history then the very promising new CIGS guys who have a long way to go between small 1.5MW fab plants to even small 30MW fully optimized production. Not all of them will make it… but some definitely will and I wish Global and all the others the greatest luck!

    Reply
  • Peggy 09/18/09 3:14 PM

    PS I meant “SHORT Sellers.”

    Reply
.