Ex-Microsoft Scientist Crafts Nuclear Reactor Startup

TerraPower is gearing up to enter the new nuclear market with a reactor that runs on natural or depleted uranium.

Intellectual Ventures, the high-level think tank created by ex-Microsoft chief scientist Nathan Myhrvold, is going nuclear.

The firm is getting prepared to spin out a company called TerraPower that will develop nuclear reactors that run primarily on natural or depleted uranium, rather than enriched uranium. With un-enriched fuel, the reactors could be loaded up with fuel and sealed for 30 to 60 years. 

Switching from enriched fuel would reduce risks associated with nuclear proliferation and transportation as well as reduce the amount of nuclear waste primarily because the stockpile of uranium would go farther. Depleted uranium is a waste product in the enrichment process. TerraPower's reactor needs some enriched uranium, but only at the beginning to initiate a reaction. 

The switch could also mean that the available supplies of uranium could be exploited to provide power for centuries or even thousands of years, according to the company, far longer than what can be done with enriched uranium.

The reactors will ideally vary in size from a few megawatts, big enough to power industrial sites or small cities, to large multi-gigawatt reactors that can power a major city. Terrapower is also looking at thorium reactors, which do not release plutonium as a byproduct. That would further reduce any risks associated with nuclear.

Like it or not, nuclear is making something of a comeback worldwide. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Agency expects to receive approximately 30 applications for new reactors over the next few years. Proponents say nuclear is clean and inexpensive and safer than it was in the past. Critics say it still isn't cost effective.

Threading that gap are new startups like TerraPower and Hyperion Power Generation, which is also developing a small nuclear reactor. Some companies such as General Fusion want to do fusion reactors.

TerraPower emerged from the invention sessions the company runs. Intellectual Ventures gathers scientists from universities like MIT, independent researchers and private enterprise to come up with ideas that can be turned into inventions and companies. Typically, the group shoots for ideas that might have a major impact on society several years from now. (Here's a feature on them).

Intellectual Ventures then applies for patents on these ideas and forms companies when possible. Intellectual Ventures is somewhat controversial in technology circles. Critics say that the company files for patents (and buys patents from ailing companies such as Transmeta) to sue corporations and/or extract royalties. The term "patent troll" is often applied to the company.

Myhrvold, however, tells a different story. The people involved in Intellectual Ventures are primarily scientists, and often well-regarded scientists who have won major awards. They aren't marketing and sales experts. Major corporations have gutted their research departments. Thus, the company really exists to fill a gap that has occurred in the market. The scientists gain freedom from having to build a full-fledged company and large corporations don't have to worry about recruiting high-priced talent.

The company will be run by John Gilleland, who is the manager of the nuclear program at Intellectual Ventures. Before Terrapower, he was the CEO of Archimedes Technology Group, where he focused on the development of new technologies for mitigating waste from nuclear weapons, reprocessing spent reactor fuel, and enriching uranium. Before that, he was at Bechtel and the managing director at the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor program.

Correction: An earlier version of this story misspelled TerraPower. 

Comments [8]

  • Andrew Lett 01/30/09 8:27 PM

    Heavy water nuclear reactors in Canada (CANDU) already use unenriched uranium as a fuel, and have been in commercial operation for decades. Light water nuclear reactors use enriched uranium; this distinction was not mentioned in your article.

    Reply
  • Dan Yurman 01/31/09 6:22 AM

    the url for my comments is

    djysrv.blogspot.com/2008/09/microsoft-veteran-boots-up-nuclear.html

    Reply
  • Neil Farbstein 01/31/09 7:43 AM

    a terrorists group that has shovels can build a tunnel to one of those reactors and steal the uranium. and the metal reactor parts will be radioactive waster that will be around for hundreds of years or longer. Not in my backyard!

    Reply
  • ravi bala 02/5/09 5:51 AM

    Inventor:
    “a terrorists group that has shovels can build a tunnel to one of those reactors and steal the uranium. and the metal reactor parts will be radioactive waster that will be around for hundreds of years or longer. Not in my backyard!”

    Wow. I can say that about a coal power plant (Co2, sludge waste, metals from runoff that could damage groundwater), an oil power plant (CO2, sulphurous emissions, oil tank leaks and potential explosive target), Natural Gas (Boom!). As long as you turn on the switch and expect power, you need to figure out what price ( economical and environmental) you want to pay for it. even solar and windpower are not environmentally benign. I am a former nuclear engineer (have not worked in nuclear for 20 years) and have no allegiance to the power industry. I think that educated folks have to look at the risk reward profile for any activity - including your inventions ( I can say that without even knowing what you invented)!

    Reply
  • ravi bala 02/5/09 5:51 AM

    Inventor:
    “a terrorists group that has shovels can build a tunnel to one of those reactors and steal the uranium. and the metal reactor parts will be radioactive waster that will be around for hundreds of years or longer. Not in my backyard!”

    Wow. I can say that about a coal power plant (Co2, sludge waste, metals from runoff that could damage groundwater), an oil power plant (CO2, sulphurous emissions, oil tank leaks and potential explosive target), Natural Gas (Boom!). As long as you turn on the switch and expect power, you need to figure out what price ( economical and environmental) you want to pay for it. even solar and windpower are not environmentally benign. I am a former nuclear engineer (have not worked in nuclear for 20 years) and have no allegiance to the power industry. I think that educated folks have to look at the risk reward profile for any activity - including your inventions ( I can say that without even knowing what you invented)!

    Reply
  • Mihai 07/15/09 9:28 AM

    I guess you know the difference between natural and depleted uranium (DU). CANDU uses indeed natural uranium, yet we still need to see a DU-fueled reactor.

    Reply
.