Energy Storage and the Demise of Gasoline

Think of gas as a form of time shifting. Like TiVo for geology.

Energy Storage and the Demise of Gasoline

Whether we like it or not, the most efficient energy storage technology available today is petroleum -- captured and "stored" millions of years ago, retrieved from under the ground or under the seafloor, heavily processed, always burned, occasionally spilled and frequently fought over.  But the societal costs of using energy stored in fossil fuels are staggering.  It is my view that when historians look back at the early 21st century energy revolution, the commentary will be about efficient and cost-effective energy storage breakthroughs that minimized reliance on gasoline.

Gasoline is fundamentally an energy storage technology.  In essence, the energy captured millions of years ago by the planet's plant and animal life is powering our vehicles today. Gasoline is the medium by which the energy of prehistoric Earth is "time shifted" to the present day.  Today's energy storage technologies are accomplishing the same basic feat; energy captured at one time (when there is an excess of energy) is shifted to another (when energy is scarce).

In short, energy storage eliminates waste.  For example, utilities try to match energy supply and demand without the benefit of energy storage. As a result, they continuously over-supply to guarantee that they can keep up with demand. Today it is cheaper for utilities to waste this over-generation, and generate more later, than it is to store excess energy for later use.  If utilities could cost-effectively time shift their energy through storage mechanisms, we could eliminate the waste of over-generation and significantly improve our efficiency.  The time shifting of energy through storage is an absolutely key concept in our efforts to solve the energy efficiency challenge.

Renewable energy generation plants often produce without regard for the timing of demand. Consider wind farms: they produce energy when the wind blows; demand has nothing to do with it.  Application of time shifting storage technologies would enable capturing energy whenever the wind blows and distributing it when demand requires.  However, to do so at an economically viable scale requires accelerated development of cost-effective energy storage technologies.

The transportation sector is another vast opportunity for efficiency through energy storage.  Every time we hit the brakes, for instance, enormous amounts of energy are wasted:  kinetic energy is lost -- usually forever -- in the form of heat.  While today's hybrid-drive vehicle technologies already partially time shift that kinetic energy to the next acceleration event, the ultimate automotive energy time shifter is the fully electric car.  Energy generated elsewhere, ideally from a renewable source at a time when demand is low, powers your trip to work, to soccer practice, or to the grocery store.

Yet a singularly critical question remains: can enhanced energy storage technology help make widespread adoption of fully electric cars a reality?  In my opinion, the fundamental key to widespread adoption of the electric car -- and the eventual demise of gasoline -- is energy storage.  As the technologies develop and mature, energy storage will become the foundation for this new vehicle industry.  Without energy storage advancements and a greater awareness about energy waste, the electric vehicle opportunity will not fulfill its ultimate potential.

But how do we accelerate innovation and adoption?  This is where the government has a key role to play.  While it is micro-economically rational to use fossil fuels until they run out, it is socially and environmentally detrimental to do so.  The societal impacts of gasoline are market externalities that demand government intervention and microeconomic incentives.  It has effectively become a requirement that governments collaborate with each other and with the private sector to mitigate the effectiveness of gasoline as an energy storage technology.

There are three areas where I believe the government can make a vital contribution:  using policy to encourage R&D innovation, both in the public and private sector; aiding in the development of a domestic energy storage industry; and ensuring the necessary utility infrastructure is available to support electric vehicles.

The very early stages of this type of successful public-private partnership are already visible in a city like Seoul, South Korea, which has begun aggressively experimenting with hybrid taxis and is introducing its first electric buses.  Within 10 years, the city will replace all 9,000 buses and 72,000 taxis with electric or hybrid vehicles. To reinforce the shift, Seoul is buying electric cars for public use and offering subsidies for transport companies that are switching to green vehicles. It has also promised motorists who drive electric cars discounts on parking fees and congestion charges.

Japan is another example. Over the last decade, the Japanese government has invested significant capital into lithium ion battery industry initiatives to establish a leading global manufacturing presence. This investment is paying off many times over as the Japanese dominate the global lithium-ion battery industry.The U.S. government can take both lessons and inspiration from these examples.  Progress is possible, even likely.  Nonetheless, adoption of new energy storage technologies has been slow, but only due in part to the need for better and more effective time shifting.  Energy users are equally culpable.  There is a real and deep lack of awareness and demand for solutions.  Simply put, the value of energy storage is not obvious to most people.  

Ultimately, it is everyday consumers that will drive the adoption rate for energy storage technologies.  If consumer demand for full electric vehicles is there, then capital, technologies and products will follow.  Government must play a key role here too by increasing the awareness of both the problem and the opportunity.  Remember the crying American Indian from the 1970s advertising campaign to end littering?  The impact of that campaign was deep and long-lasting -- and ultimately it changed our behavior.

When it comes to alleviating energy waste, energy storage advocates need a similarly focused and clear educational initiative.  A concerted and cohesive effort would help us take strides toward a meaningfully improved energy and environmental future.  The nation is now at a tipping point; unlike the failed solar boom of the 1970s, people are ready to change the way we generate and use energy.  I believe that they need to be equally ready to store and time-shift energy, and they should be asking for technologies that do it in fundamentally new ways.

Even with encouraging signs and indications of a tipping point, we can't lose sight of the fact that clean energy is harder than fossil fuels to use; the generation and use points are too often disconnected. To improve that connectivity, we must harness cutting-edge energy storage technologies to provide that currently elusive time shift of supply to meet demand.

The next generation of energy storage improvements is already helping move us in this direction. In the end, I believe that these up-and-coming innovations will almost certainly spell the demise of gasoline in our society. Yet the timing of gasoline's death sentence is really up to us.  It is about consumer motivation, business engagement and government participation.  The effort must be collective and collaborative to end the reliance on gasoline and to improve the efficiency of our energy consumption.

***

Rick Luebbe is  CEO of EnerG2, a seven-year-old company focused on introducing advanced nano-structured materials for next-generation energy storage breakthroughs.

9 Comments

  • Abhishek 06/7/10 1:24 PM

    New generation Energy Storage technologies are still some way away from mass usage due to high costs,low reliability etc.Grid Storage solutions unfortunately have not seen any major breakthroughs as of now.The old ways of energy storage like Pumped Hydro Storage (http://bit.ly/9Y2v4F) are still going to be the major growth area in the near future

    Reply
  • jbenni 06/7/10 2:02 PM

    Thanks for the insightful macro perspective.  Your point that petroleum, like hydrogen, is simply a storage and delivery medium—not a primary source of energy—is too often overlooked.

    Your comments on the importance of storing energy from wind and solar are also astute.  I’d like to know your thoughts on whether a large network of electric vehicles on a smart-charging grid could provide the needed elasticity.  If a myriad of car batteries, all networked together, could cost effectively absorb bursts of available electric power (e.g., when windy conditions prevail in a region) and also feed back power to that same grid to level out peaks in demand.

    It’s well known that reducing the peak demand for electric power has more economic impact than reducing the total demand for power.  And any “load leveling” approach can capitalize on those economic factors. 

    Ultracapacitors, better batteries, time-of-use billing, and smart grids are all part of the solution.  Do you think distributed production and distributed storage will prevail over centralized approaches?

    thanks!

    Reply
  • aamorino 06/7/10 2:03 PM

    There is no proof that petrolium is not an abiotic fluid. With that said, it is foolish to assume the cost of war and protecting America’s oil sources does not play a role economically as well as the fact that burning petroleum products contributes to CO2 in our atmosphere. Every other time the CO2 content was this high, Earth followed with a short global warming cycle into a full, blown-out ICE-AGE. Billions of USD is spent annually in medical fields to counter-act the effects of burning carbon based fuels. Isn’t petro better served as a plastic, soon it will be too expensive to burn anyway. Why not look now for a solution(s) lest we destroy the future of the human race whom holds a fraction of time on this planet compared to other species.

    Reply
  • Bob Tregilus 06/7/10 2:17 PM

    Actually, a number of viable technologies are coming online to facilitate energy storage. One of the more promising stems from the work of Dr. Willett Kemptom at the University of Delaware and his vehicle-to-grid (V2G) concept. Dr. Kemptom has moved V2G far beyond being only an academic exercise. He not only has gotten the state legislature to adopt a law that allows people to net-meter energy from their vehicles into the grid, but more importantly, he has partnered with PJM Interconnection who services one fifth of the US population and who is more than willing to pay people to plug-in their cars such that they may use small amounts on energy for ancillary grid services. Once a critical mass of EVs is achieved, however, and that number is actually quite small, the collective storage of those cars will be able to firm large amounts of intermittent renewables.

    While static storage will be needed, it would be very wasteful and inefficient to not utilize the emerging fleet of electric drive vehicles for grid storage as well.

    Bob Tregilus
    Co-host -
    This Week in Energy (TWiEpodcast)
    http://ThsiWeekinEnergy.tv

    Reply
  • Solar Don 06/7/10 3:50 PM

    Rick makes a lot of excellent points, yet if we explore further, we can see that while the Sun is the solution, it is also the problem, in that the Sun creates heat and to deal with this heat we deploy air conditioning,  one of the single largest energy consumption modes we have.  Most of the time shift problem of over sized capacity is dealing with mid day air conditioning needs.  A company Calmac Inc.,  has an Ice storage system that is simple and robust.  See http://www.calmac.com/  (full disclosure I have no economic interest here).

    Other innovative Ideas Rick did not mention include Solar to Hydrogen for Storage,  and Coal to electricity via fuel cells; not to push geologic coal but biochar via Hydrothermal Carbonization.

    Reply
  • Bill Reichert 06/7/10 7:52 PM

    I love the idea of electric vehicles as much as the next guy, but pushing for public policy and infrastructure development favoring all-electric vehicles is a very poor way to allocate the scarce time and resources we have to solve our energy problem.  Gasoline is a wonderful way to power vehicles, especially if it is used more efficiently than we do now.  We can dramatically reduce our gasoline consumption with Prius and Volt type designs, without going all the way to extraordinarily expensive all-electric designs and without requiring a substantial transformation of our utility infrastructure.  Indeed, supporting hybrid technology will almost certainly reduce gasoline use faster and cost society less than supporting all-electric designs—because hybrids are much more affordable and will cause the fleet of all-gas vehicles to turn over faster.  Let’s not force the issue to “all or nothing” positions.  We can stretch our gasoline resources indefinitely at reasonable prices if we can reduce our consumption with economical alternatives.

    Reply
  • Kenneth Adrian Ellis 06/8/10 12:02 AM

    Speaking of kinetic…there is an author with a book released about his own special, God-given power…“A Kinetic Person’s Power”! Goto: http://www.YouTube.com , search: Kenneth A. Ellis to view his professional author display video(put the display on autoplay please)! Next goto: http://www.prlog.org/10285981 to read his free press release! Finally, goto: http://www.BlogTalkRadio.com/Strategic-Book-Club , Click on his archived episode! It is a 15 minute:59 second “spot”!
    Enjoy these links! God Bless and Thank You!

    Reply
  • Jasmine 06/8/10 10:04 AM

    Storage is an integral part of our world. From the food in our cupboard to the water in our reservoirs, it’s how supply and demand is balanced. Imagine how inefficient life would be if we had to search for food or water each time we became hungry or thirsty. Yet this is the “on demand” system we currently use. In fact we have approx twice as many power plants as we really need—because electricity at night is barely utilized. Another name for the imbalance in the time we use energy is “load factor” (average power divided by the peak power). And since power consuming air-conditioners were introduced the load factor has gotten worse and worse. Storage is critical for the current grid system and critical for the new renewable system in which wind and solar by nature lack storage abilities.

    Reply
  • Nick 06/8/10 2:48 PM

    Jasmine makes an excellent point, but I would emphasize the need for smart grids as well.  Even with load sharing and storage abilities, we need to create an infrastructure that allows for back feeding into the power grid.  Home solar cells are the perfect example.  They work excellent for producing energy during sunlight hours, but most of the time we are at work during those times.  The energy harvested during these peak hours can be distributed over a wider energy usage base by the effective installation of smart grids.  Also, once the energy is harvested it can be stored, then subsequently redistributed during lower energy production times.  The installation of smart grids is, in my opinion, the greatest inhibiting factor in the implementation of sustainable energy production.  Although the initial costs of a full-scale transfer are enormous, the capital investment is extraordinary.  Just think of the maintenance cost reduction of switching to even 15% solar energy…

    Reply
Need an avatar? Get one here: Gravatar