Batteries for the Grid

With natural-gas prices on the rise and renewable-energy targets pushing for greener energy, utilities such as Xcel Energy are hoping that batteries can take the edges off bumpy wind-power production.

Most traditional battery chemicals aren’t suitable for wind power, Bradford said. "You need a battery that can buffer really high capacity demands," she said, adding that lead-acid batteries, for example, would require a "humungous" battery bank to handle that need.

But sodium-sulfur seems promising because the technology has achieved efficiencies of more than 89 percent and pulse power -- the ability of a battery to deliver energy at full power without reducing its reliability or its lifespan -- of six times the current ratings, she said.
 
Still, price remains an issue, she said. In September, AEP said its project would cost about $4,500 per kilowatt. Xcel said it hadn’t worked out the pricing yet, but had received a $1 million grant from Minnesota’s Renewable Development Fund, subject to approval from the state’s public utilities commission.

"It has potential," Bradford said, referring to sulfur-sodium technology. "There certainly are some big names looking at it -- there are certainly some benefits -- and I think this could be an option. But I think it’s so soon, in terms of commercializing it, that it’s hard to tell if the prices will come down [enough]."

Another issue? So far, only one manufacturer produces sodium-sulfur batteries, she said.

"That kind of puts a freeze [on the market] unless they start licensing it out," she said. "That would be a long-term challenge."

Meanwhile, other competitors -- both startups and traditional battery players -- are chomping at the bit to try to take a bite of the potential utility energy-storage market.

"I know the traditional battery guys would love to get to that market, but they haven’t been able to do it yet," Bradford said.  

Comments [5]

  • Chris Stern 03/3/08 4:36 AM

    VRB Power offers a safer option. Vandium Redox Batteries last 4 times as long as a NaS battery. They do not have to be stored at 300 degrees C and ar not potentially explosive.Apparently they have a better AC-AC round trip efficiency than NaS (can anyone confirm this?). Why has this electric company chosen NaS over VRB?

    Reply
  • Eric Wesoff 03/3/08 3:09 PM

    NaS batteries have been successfully deployed in the field in utility-scale storage and load-management applications VRB has won a few orders with their regenerative fuel cell.  There is still a long way to go for either of these technologies to provide cost-effective storage on the enormous scale required.

    Reply
  • Daniel Neumansky 03/4/08 2:37 PM

    What about Altairnano and The AES corp with their 2MW battery which I believe they are going to use for windfarm load leveling.

    Reply
  • Anna Oneil 03/7/08 10:23 AM

    Jennifer—do you know what the environmental impact of these sodium-sulfur batteries is over time?

    Reply
  • Deborah Maytubby 03/8/08 7:57 AM

    My comment is concerning the 80.000 pound batteries. They hold only 7 hours of energy for 500 average homes and my thoughts were that they should be on train tracks and mobile for moving from place to place to be refilled with wind energy from other spots ,if economically possible.

    Reply
.