• Tuesday, June 16, 2009 Latest Update: 2:15PM

Greentech Solar

Are Fuel Cells the Key to Solar Thermal Technology?

Why are photovoltaic panels more popular than solar thermal collectors on homes? One big reason is easy storage. New technology may change that. 

SAN FRANCISCO -- When it comes to energy storage, solar panels have it easy.

Homeowners with PV panels on their roofs effectively store power by shuttling electricity generated in the daytime onto the grid, said Jane Davidson, a professor at the University of Minnesota and the director of the Solar Energy Laboratory there, during a presentation at the Fifth Germany California Solar Day taking place at PG&E headquarters in San Francisco today.

It's not so easy in solar thermal. Concentrated solar thermal plants in the desert store heat from the sun in large tanks of molten salt. That can be used to create steam to run a generator for a few hours after the sun goes down.

But in homes it is not so easy. Although roughly 75 percent of the homes and commercial buildings in the U.S. could potentially derive some of their power from solar systems, most homes aren't located in the center of the desert and thus don't get the kind of solar radiation a CSP plant will.

To make solar thermal economical, many of these buildings will need seasonal storage. "There is a mismatch," she said. "They need systems so that we can store it in the summer for use in the winter."

Which brings us to the headline. For long-term storage, storing energy in chemical bonds – the secret sauce behind fuel cells – may be the answer. Theoretically, heat generated in the summer could be used to generate a reaction, which could then be unwound later in the year.

Researchers at the Paul Scherrer Institut, for instance are looking at ways to take heat from the sun, zinc, oxygen and a dash of carbon to create zinc oxide and carbon monoxide. Zinc oxide could then be unwound in further reactions to produce hydrogen for fuel cells and zinc, which can be used to release electrons in other reactions. Some researchers have proposed storing heat through a zinc-to-zinc oxide reaction.

For more near-term storage, phase change materials – materials like zeolites and desiccants that move relatively easily from solid to liquid or liquid to gas states – could be used.

And for really near-term storage, says Werner Koldehoff, a board member of the German Solar Industry Association, households could use the ultimate phase change material: water. Water could be turned into ice (through a solar-driven chiller) and changed into water. 

In Germany, energy storage for some residential thermal systems is accomplished through storing liquids heated by the sun in pipes in the earth. 


Join experts and influencers at Greentech Media's Growth Opportunities in the New PV Market: Projects, Finance and Policy in San Francisco on July 13.

Comments [4]

  • scott 06/16/09 3:59 PM

    I assumed the reason people didn’t want solar thermal on their roof was the expensive inefficient small turbine needed to turn the heat into electricity. Seriously though, i was under the impression that solar thermal for hot water already was quite very cost effective, and at those temperatures and pressures, short term storage was not a big issue… For longer term storage I’m guessing it would be much cheaper to just have a back up electrical or natural gas water heater for the time in winter when it is needed. I would guess the reason people feel the need for putting extra electricity on the grid is the high price of PV systems, and this serves to lower those costs somewhat. i think the reason people don’t get solar water heaters is that they don’t know about them, and it sounds more complicated.  Really its just bad marketing.

    Reply
  • russ 06/17/09 10:02 AM

    First we have to manage overnight storage - not too easy in itself if an air source to hydronic heat pump of 5kW rating is capable of roughly 2.5 m3 per hour. For 4 to 6 hours a day it is easy. How to store the 55 degree C water for use at 3 AM. For 12 hours of storage you would need an insulated tank of 30 m3 0 not cheap or easy.

    Reply
      • Steve Pluvia 06/22/09 9:22 PM

        Exactly Russ.  Solar hot water in a modern home means one thing.  Added cost.  You must have a redundant system to support sunless days.  Bottom line, solar thermal has its place in off grid or cabins, or very specific regions or very specific purposes.  For reliable hot domestic water it is not cost effective and should not be used.

  • Bill Brambelburton 07/7/09 4:04 PM

    Sorry Steve, you clearly don’t get it.  Of course adding solar hot water to a house equals an increased capital cost, but you are quite ignorant to equate that to not being cost effective and thus recommending against its use. First off, you seem to think a “redundant,” totally independent standard water heater is needed. This is almost never the case for new constructions, as an auxiliary heating element is integrated with the solar storage tanks turning your one tank into a combined solar and conventional hot water heater, no need for an entire secondary system as you wrongly imply. As for you “not cost effective” and “very specific regions” claims, realize that solar thermal systems in place ANYWHERE in the continental US payback their initial cost within 7-15 years, that includes all the way up in northern Minnesota!  Compare that to the usual 15-25 year payback on solar PV systems and realize that thermal is actually the MOST COST EFFECTIVE domestic solar option. Your ill researched opinions risk misinforming the masses. Keep out of the discussion if you aren’t well versed.

    Reply
.