Chinese automotive equipment giant Wanxiang has already given up a lot in its $256.6 million winning bid to take over bankrupt U.S. battery maker A123. Not only has it said goodbye to A123’s U.S. government work, it has lost the remaining $120 million or so of a $249 million Department of Energy grant that’s helped build A123’s lithium-ion factories in Michigan -- plants that Wanxiang says it will keep open.

But political opponents of A123’s sale to a Chinese company are saying that may not be enough. Even A123’s commercial technology is inextricably linked back to its federally funded work with partners like DOE and the Department of Defense, they say. That could allow Wanxiang to develop military applications based on A123’s U.S.-funded technology, it is claimed -- and that’s enough reason to block the sale.

These are some of the issues facing the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. The committee chaired by Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner is in charge of deciding just what parts of a proposed sale of A123’s assets and intellectual property might constitute a national security risk. This week, the group began a 45-day review of the sale, with a deadline of January 15, 2013 to make a decision.

Let the lobbying begin. Johnson Controls, which had wanted to acquire A123’s automotive assets out of bankruptcy for $125 million, but bowed out of the auction after a final bid of $251 million jointly with Japan’s NEC, has made it clear that it stands ready to buy A123 if the sale to Wanxiang is blocked.

The Strategic Materials Advisory Council, an industry group, said this week that dozens of members of Congress have weighed in against Wanxiang’s takeover. U.S. Rep. Bill Huizenga (R.-Mich.), representing the state with the most to gain or lose from the future of A123’s U.S.-based manufacturing, took to Facebook to call it a threat to national security and economic competitiveness.

Members of Congress have already been demanding investigations into A123 and key business partner Fisker Automotive, along with other DOE-backed companies that have gone under (Abound Solar, Beacon Power) in the wake of Solyndra’s bankruptcy. Of course, DOE has also given money to foreign companies to create U.S. jobs, with mixed success -- LG Chem, which took a $151 million DOE award for its Michigan factory that builds batteries for the Chevy Volt, furloughed 200 workers in September.

As for A123’s military work, it was sold to Illinois-based Navitas Systems for $2.25 million, ensuring that Wanxiang would not take over federal contracts for projects like portable power systems and unmanned vehicles. Wanxiang gets the remainder of the Waltham, Mass-based company’s assets, including its automotive business with customers like Fisker, General Motors, BMW, Tata Motors and Smith Electric Vehicles, and its grid storage business, with partners including AES Energy Storage, Sempra Energy and NSTAR.

Just how many of those customers will remain with A123 through its transition remains to be seen. GM, which has tapped A123 to build batteries for its Spark EV, has remained mum on whether it will continue to work with the company as it goes through bankruptcy. Fisker, which accounted for 26 percent of A123’s revenues at the time of its bankruptcy, is facing its own challenges.

On the grid-scale energy storage front, AES, which accounted for 24 percent of A123’s revenues at the time of its bankruptcy, last week announced a new battery partner, Mitsubishi-GS Yuasa, for a 20-megawatt lithium-ion energy storage project in Chile. AES Energy Storage President Chris Shelton said in an interview this week that the choice of a new partner wasn’t related to A123’s bankruptcy, and that AES envisions working with a post-reorganization A123, as well as many other battery partners in the future. He wouldn’t say whether or not A123 had competed for the latest bid.

Tags: a123, abound, aes energy storage, bankrupt, batteries, beacon power, china, congress, doe, energy storage, federal, fisker, smart grid, solyndra, trade